Proportion and factors associated with intra-procedural pain among women undergoing manual vacuum aspiration for incomplete abortion at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda.

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Pan African Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.11604/pamj.2024.49.63.39955
Jimmyy Opee, Stephen Bawakanya Mayanja, Musa Kayondo, Leevan Tibaijuka, Felix Bongomin, Christopher Garimoi Orach, Joseph Ngonzi
{"title":"Proportion and factors associated with intra-procedural pain among women undergoing manual vacuum aspiration for incomplete abortion at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda.","authors":"Jimmyy Opee, Stephen Bawakanya Mayanja, Musa Kayondo, Leevan Tibaijuka, Felix Bongomin, Christopher Garimoi Orach, Joseph Ngonzi","doi":"10.11604/pamj.2024.49.63.39955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intra-Procedural Pain (IPP) is common among women undergoing Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) for incomplete abortion. Globally, the proportion varies between 60% to 90% while in sub-Saharan Africa including Uganda, the proportion varies between 80% to 98%. Intra-procedural pain management during MVA includes a para-cervical block (using 1% lidocaine) or an opioid (using 100 mg of intravenous pethidine). The study aimed to determine the proportion and factors associated with IPP among women undergoing MVA for incomplete abortion at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>we conducted a cross-sectional study among 207 women who underwent MVA for incomplete abortion between December 2020 and May 2021. An interviewer-administered structured questionnaire was used, and pain assessment was done using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) considering an IPP as a pain score of 6 or more. The participant characteristics were summarized. The proportion of women with IPP was calculated. We performed multivariable logistic regression to determine the factors associated with IPP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>we consecutively enrolled 207 women with a mean age of 25.8 ± 5.8 years. The proportion of women with IPP undergoing MVA at MRRH was 82.6%, 95% C.I 76.8 - 87.2. The factors significantly associated with IPP were age and cervical dilatation. The odds of IPP increased with decreasing age of the women; compared to older women aged >30 years, teenagers aged <20 years; aOR: 8, 95% CI 1.85-34.61; p=0.005, while women aged 20-24 years; aOR: 3.45, 95% CI 1.47-8.20; p=0.004 and those aged 25-30 years; aOR: 2.84, 95% CI 1.20-6.74; p=0.018. Women with cervical dilatation of 1-2 cm had the odds of IPP increased; aOR: 2.27, 95% CI 1.11-4.62; p=0.024 compared to a cervical dilation of 3-4 cm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>majority of women undergoing MVA at MRRH experienced IPP. Younger women and those with cervical dilatation 1-2 cm are more likely to experience IPP. We recommend optimised and personalised pain management strategies for women undergoing MVA.</p>","PeriodicalId":48190,"journal":{"name":"Pan African Medical Journal","volume":"49 ","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pan African Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2024.49.63.39955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intra-Procedural Pain (IPP) is common among women undergoing Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) for incomplete abortion. Globally, the proportion varies between 60% to 90% while in sub-Saharan Africa including Uganda, the proportion varies between 80% to 98%. Intra-procedural pain management during MVA includes a para-cervical block (using 1% lidocaine) or an opioid (using 100 mg of intravenous pethidine). The study aimed to determine the proportion and factors associated with IPP among women undergoing MVA for incomplete abortion at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH).

Methods: we conducted a cross-sectional study among 207 women who underwent MVA for incomplete abortion between December 2020 and May 2021. An interviewer-administered structured questionnaire was used, and pain assessment was done using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) considering an IPP as a pain score of 6 or more. The participant characteristics were summarized. The proportion of women with IPP was calculated. We performed multivariable logistic regression to determine the factors associated with IPP.

Results: we consecutively enrolled 207 women with a mean age of 25.8 ± 5.8 years. The proportion of women with IPP undergoing MVA at MRRH was 82.6%, 95% C.I 76.8 - 87.2. The factors significantly associated with IPP were age and cervical dilatation. The odds of IPP increased with decreasing age of the women; compared to older women aged >30 years, teenagers aged <20 years; aOR: 8, 95% CI 1.85-34.61; p=0.005, while women aged 20-24 years; aOR: 3.45, 95% CI 1.47-8.20; p=0.004 and those aged 25-30 years; aOR: 2.84, 95% CI 1.20-6.74; p=0.018. Women with cervical dilatation of 1-2 cm had the odds of IPP increased; aOR: 2.27, 95% CI 1.11-4.62; p=0.024 compared to a cervical dilation of 3-4 cm.

Conclusion: majority of women undergoing MVA at MRRH experienced IPP. Younger women and those with cervical dilatation 1-2 cm are more likely to experience IPP. We recommend optimised and personalised pain management strategies for women undergoing MVA.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pan African Medical Journal
Pan African Medical Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
691
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信