Effectiveness of Edge Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial for Muscle Tension Dysphonia.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Nassim Ahmadi, Katherine Verdolini Abbott, Fatemeh Rajati, Narges Moein, Seyyedeh Maryam Khoddami, Farhad Torabinezhad, Behnoosh Vasaghi-Gharamaleki, Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani
{"title":"Effectiveness of Edge Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial for Muscle Tension Dysphonia.","authors":"Nassim Ahmadi, Katherine Verdolini Abbott, Fatemeh Rajati, Narges Moein, Seyyedeh Maryam Khoddami, Farhad Torabinezhad, Behnoosh Vasaghi-Gharamaleki, Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the effectiveness of \"Edge Therapy\" (ET) for improving glottal closure in singers with primary muscle tension dysphonia (MTD-1).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Double-blind randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty adult male singers with MTD-1 were recruited using convenience sampling method from a university otolaryngology clinic. The participants were randomly assigned to either laryngeal manual therapy (LMT) plus sham therapy (control group, CG), or LMT plus ET (Edge Therapy Group, ETG). All participants received eight treatment sessions and were evaluated before, immediately after, and at 2-week follow-up using videolaryngostroboscopy, acoustic voice analysis, auditory-perceptual ratings, and the Persian Singing Voice Handicap Index (SVHI). Data from 31 participants (14 CG and 17 ETG) were available for analysis using repeated measures analysis of variance and the Friedman test, respectively, based on data normality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although no significant differences were found between the groups for acoustic measures (F0, jitter, shimmer, and harmonics-to-noise ratio), auditory-perceptual ratings improved more in the ETG, with 94% of participants scoring 6 or higher compared with 72% in the CG (P < 0.001). Glottal closure also improved significantly in both groups, with greater improvements in the ETG. MTD type shifted toward reduced supraglottic involvement in both groups. SVHI scores decreased significantly post treatment and at follow-up, with more prominent improvements in the ETG (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both LMT and ET were effective in improving vocal quality, laryngeal function, and reducing self-perceived vocal handicap in singers with MTD-1. The addition of ET to LMT provided superior benefits, particularly in perceptual measures and glottal closure.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the effectiveness of "Edge Therapy" (ET) for improving glottal closure in singers with primary muscle tension dysphonia (MTD-1).

Study design: Double-blind randomized clinical trial.

Methods: Forty adult male singers with MTD-1 were recruited using convenience sampling method from a university otolaryngology clinic. The participants were randomly assigned to either laryngeal manual therapy (LMT) plus sham therapy (control group, CG), or LMT plus ET (Edge Therapy Group, ETG). All participants received eight treatment sessions and were evaluated before, immediately after, and at 2-week follow-up using videolaryngostroboscopy, acoustic voice analysis, auditory-perceptual ratings, and the Persian Singing Voice Handicap Index (SVHI). Data from 31 participants (14 CG and 17 ETG) were available for analysis using repeated measures analysis of variance and the Friedman test, respectively, based on data normality.

Results: Although no significant differences were found between the groups for acoustic measures (F0, jitter, shimmer, and harmonics-to-noise ratio), auditory-perceptual ratings improved more in the ETG, with 94% of participants scoring 6 or higher compared with 72% in the CG (P < 0.001). Glottal closure also improved significantly in both groups, with greater improvements in the ETG. MTD type shifted toward reduced supraglottic involvement in both groups. SVHI scores decreased significantly post treatment and at follow-up, with more prominent improvements in the ETG (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Both LMT and ET were effective in improving vocal quality, laryngeal function, and reducing self-perceived vocal handicap in singers with MTD-1. The addition of ET to LMT provided superior benefits, particularly in perceptual measures and glottal closure.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信