The Value of Non-Instrumental Information in Anxiety: Insights from a Resource-Rational Model of Planning.

Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) Pub Date : 2025-02-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5334/cpsy.124
Bilal A Bari, Samuel J Gershman
{"title":"The Value of Non-Instrumental Information in Anxiety: Insights from a Resource-Rational Model of Planning.","authors":"Bilal A Bari, Samuel J Gershman","doi":"10.5334/cpsy.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anxiety is intimately related to the desire for information and, under some accounts, thought to arise from the intolerance of uncertainty. Here, we seek to test this hypothesis by studying the relationship between trait anxiety and the willingness to pay for non-instrumental information (i.e., information that reveals whether an event will happen but cannot be used to change the outcome). We model behavior with a resource-rational model of planning, according to which non-instrumental information is useful for planning ahead, but paying for this information only makes sense if the anticipated benefits of planning outweigh the cognitive and financial costs. We find a bidirectional effect of trait anxiety factors on information seeking behavior: those with high trait somatic anxiety exhibit a stronger preference for non-instrumental information, whereas those with high trait negative affect exhibit a weaker preference. By fitting the resource-rational model, we find that this divergent desire for information arises from the utility of obtaining information for future planning (increased in somatic anxiety, decreased in negative affect). Our findings lend support to the intolerance of uncertainty hypothesis in somatic anxiety and highlight the importance of studying anxiety as a multifactorial construct.</p>","PeriodicalId":72664,"journal":{"name":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","volume":"9 1","pages":"63-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cpsy.124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anxiety is intimately related to the desire for information and, under some accounts, thought to arise from the intolerance of uncertainty. Here, we seek to test this hypothesis by studying the relationship between trait anxiety and the willingness to pay for non-instrumental information (i.e., information that reveals whether an event will happen but cannot be used to change the outcome). We model behavior with a resource-rational model of planning, according to which non-instrumental information is useful for planning ahead, but paying for this information only makes sense if the anticipated benefits of planning outweigh the cognitive and financial costs. We find a bidirectional effect of trait anxiety factors on information seeking behavior: those with high trait somatic anxiety exhibit a stronger preference for non-instrumental information, whereas those with high trait negative affect exhibit a weaker preference. By fitting the resource-rational model, we find that this divergent desire for information arises from the utility of obtaining information for future planning (increased in somatic anxiety, decreased in negative affect). Our findings lend support to the intolerance of uncertainty hypothesis in somatic anxiety and highlight the importance of studying anxiety as a multifactorial construct.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信