Peak Fat Oxidation During Submaximal Exercise Remains Consistent across Menstrual Cycle and Combined Oral Contraceptive Phases.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Ida E Löfberg, Jari E Karppinen, Iida Laatikainen-Raussi, Johanna K Ihalainen, Maarit Lehti, Anthony C Hackney, Ritva S Mikkonen
{"title":"Peak Fat Oxidation During Submaximal Exercise Remains Consistent across Menstrual Cycle and Combined Oral Contraceptive Phases.","authors":"Ida E Löfberg, Jari E Karppinen, Iida Laatikainen-Raussi, Johanna K Ihalainen, Maarit Lehti, Anthony C Hackney, Ritva S Mikkonen","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Substrate metabolism during exercise may vary across the menstrual cycle (MC) phases, likely due to estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4). This study examined substrate metabolism during exercise in naturally menstruating (NoOC, n = 34) and women using combined oral contraceptives (COC, n = 19).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were measured in a fasted state in the follicular (FOL) and luteal (LUT) phases, or the inactive (INACT) and active (ACT) phases of COC use. Serum E2 and P4 were assessed using immunoassays and body composition via bioimpedance. Peak fat oxidation (PFO) and FATMAX, the intensity eliciting PFO, were evaluated using indirect calorimetry. FATMAX was calculated using peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2PEAK), measured on the following day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PFO did not differ between FOL and LUT (0.40 ± 0.09 g·min-1 vs. 0.41 ± 0.10 g·min-1, p = 0.482) or INACT and ACT (0.48 ± 0.12 g·min-1 vs. 0.44 ± 0.11 g·min-1, p = 0.099). FATMAX showed no phase-related variation (NoOC: FOL 47.3 ± 15.7 % vs. LUT 47.7 ± 13.6 %, p = 0.727; COC: INACT 57.1 ± 12.3 % vs. ACT 52.5 ± 12.2 % p = 0.172). PFO was 0.08 g·min-1 (95 % confidence interval: 0.02 g·min-1-0.14 g·min-1, p = 0.010) and FATMAX 9.8 % (95 % CI: 1.0-8.7 %, p = 0.031) higher in the INACT vs. FOL. The difference in PFO persisted after adjusting for fat-free mass and V̇O2PEAK (p = 0.033) but was not significant after excluding an outlier from the COC group (p = 0.108).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PFO and FATMAX remained stable between MC and COC phases, suggesting no need to standardize measurements by cycle phase. However, higher PFO and FATMAX in the COC group during INACT compared to FOL suggests distinct effects of exogenous hormones on metabolism compared to endogenous hormones. Practitioners should consider these differences when assessing factors influencing substrate metabolism.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003676","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Substrate metabolism during exercise may vary across the menstrual cycle (MC) phases, likely due to estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4). This study examined substrate metabolism during exercise in naturally menstruating (NoOC, n = 34) and women using combined oral contraceptives (COC, n = 19).

Methods: Participants were measured in a fasted state in the follicular (FOL) and luteal (LUT) phases, or the inactive (INACT) and active (ACT) phases of COC use. Serum E2 and P4 were assessed using immunoassays and body composition via bioimpedance. Peak fat oxidation (PFO) and FATMAX, the intensity eliciting PFO, were evaluated using indirect calorimetry. FATMAX was calculated using peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2PEAK), measured on the following day.

Results: PFO did not differ between FOL and LUT (0.40 ± 0.09 g·min-1 vs. 0.41 ± 0.10 g·min-1, p = 0.482) or INACT and ACT (0.48 ± 0.12 g·min-1 vs. 0.44 ± 0.11 g·min-1, p = 0.099). FATMAX showed no phase-related variation (NoOC: FOL 47.3 ± 15.7 % vs. LUT 47.7 ± 13.6 %, p = 0.727; COC: INACT 57.1 ± 12.3 % vs. ACT 52.5 ± 12.2 % p = 0.172). PFO was 0.08 g·min-1 (95 % confidence interval: 0.02 g·min-1-0.14 g·min-1, p = 0.010) and FATMAX 9.8 % (95 % CI: 1.0-8.7 %, p = 0.031) higher in the INACT vs. FOL. The difference in PFO persisted after adjusting for fat-free mass and V̇O2PEAK (p = 0.033) but was not significant after excluding an outlier from the COC group (p = 0.108).

Conclusions: PFO and FATMAX remained stable between MC and COC phases, suggesting no need to standardize measurements by cycle phase. However, higher PFO and FATMAX in the COC group during INACT compared to FOL suggests distinct effects of exogenous hormones on metabolism compared to endogenous hormones. Practitioners should consider these differences when assessing factors influencing substrate metabolism.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信