Peak Fat Oxidation during Submaximal Exercise Remains Consistent across Menstrual Cycle and Combined Oral Contraceptive Phases.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Ida E Löfberg, Jari E Karppinen, Iida Laatikainen-Raussi, Johanna K Ihalainen, Maarit Lehti, Anthony C Hackney, Ritva S Mikkonen
{"title":"Peak Fat Oxidation during Submaximal Exercise Remains Consistent across Menstrual Cycle and Combined Oral Contraceptive Phases.","authors":"Ida E Löfberg, Jari E Karppinen, Iida Laatikainen-Raussi, Johanna K Ihalainen, Maarit Lehti, Anthony C Hackney, Ritva S Mikkonen","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Substrate metabolism during exercise may vary across the menstrual cycle (MC) phases, likely due to estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4). This study examined substrate metabolism during exercise in naturally menstruating (NoOC, n = 34) and women using combined oral contraceptives (COC, n = 19).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were measured in a fasted state in the follicular (FOL) and luteal (LUT) phases, or the inactive (INACT) and active (ACT) phases of COC use. Serum E2 and P4 were assessed using immunoassays and body composition via bioimpedance. Peak fat oxidation (PFO) and FAT MAX , the intensity eliciting PFO, were evaluated using indirect calorimetry. FAT MAX was calculated using peak oxygen uptake (V̇O 2peak ), measured on the following day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PFO did not differ between FOL and LUT (0.40 ± 0.09 vs 0.41 ± 0.10 g·min -1 , P = 0.482) or INACT and ACT (0.48 ± 0.12 vs 0.44 ± 0.11 g·min -1 , P = 0.099). FAT MAX showed no phase-related variation (NoOC: FOL 47.3% ± 15.7% vs LUT 47.7% ± 13.6%, P = 0.727; COC: INACT 57.1% ± 12.3% vs ACT 52.5% ± 12.2% P = 0.172). PFO was 0.08 g·min -1 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.02-0.14 g·min -1 , P = 0.010) and FAT MAX 9.8% (95% CI = 1.0%-8.7%, P = 0.031) higher in the INACT versus FOL. The difference in PFO persisted after adjusting for fat-free mass and V̇O 2peak ( P = 0.033) but was not significant after excluding an outlier from the COC group ( P = 0.108).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PFO and FAT MAX remained stable between MC and COC phases, suggesting no need to standardize measurements by cycle phase. However, higher PFO and FAT MAX in the COC group during INACT compared with FOL suggests distinct effects of exogenous hormones on metabolism compared with endogenous hormones. Practitioners should consider these differences when assessing factors influencing substrate metabolism.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":"1383-1394"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003676","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Substrate metabolism during exercise may vary across the menstrual cycle (MC) phases, likely due to estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4). This study examined substrate metabolism during exercise in naturally menstruating (NoOC, n = 34) and women using combined oral contraceptives (COC, n = 19).

Methods: Participants were measured in a fasted state in the follicular (FOL) and luteal (LUT) phases, or the inactive (INACT) and active (ACT) phases of COC use. Serum E2 and P4 were assessed using immunoassays and body composition via bioimpedance. Peak fat oxidation (PFO) and FAT MAX , the intensity eliciting PFO, were evaluated using indirect calorimetry. FAT MAX was calculated using peak oxygen uptake (V̇O 2peak ), measured on the following day.

Results: PFO did not differ between FOL and LUT (0.40 ± 0.09 vs 0.41 ± 0.10 g·min -1 , P = 0.482) or INACT and ACT (0.48 ± 0.12 vs 0.44 ± 0.11 g·min -1 , P = 0.099). FAT MAX showed no phase-related variation (NoOC: FOL 47.3% ± 15.7% vs LUT 47.7% ± 13.6%, P = 0.727; COC: INACT 57.1% ± 12.3% vs ACT 52.5% ± 12.2% P = 0.172). PFO was 0.08 g·min -1 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.02-0.14 g·min -1 , P = 0.010) and FAT MAX 9.8% (95% CI = 1.0%-8.7%, P = 0.031) higher in the INACT versus FOL. The difference in PFO persisted after adjusting for fat-free mass and V̇O 2peak ( P = 0.033) but was not significant after excluding an outlier from the COC group ( P = 0.108).

Conclusions: PFO and FAT MAX remained stable between MC and COC phases, suggesting no need to standardize measurements by cycle phase. However, higher PFO and FAT MAX in the COC group during INACT compared with FOL suggests distinct effects of exogenous hormones on metabolism compared with endogenous hormones. Practitioners should consider these differences when assessing factors influencing substrate metabolism.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

亚极限运动期间的脂肪氧化峰值在月经周期和联合口服避孕药期间保持一致。
目的:运动期间的底物代谢可能在月经周期(MC)的各个阶段有所不同,可能是由于雌二醇(E2)和黄体酮(P4)。本研究检测了自然月经(NoOC, n = 34)和使用联合口服避孕药(COC, n = 19)的女性在运动期间的底物代谢。方法:参与者在卵泡期(FOL)和黄体期(LUT)或COC使用的非活性期(INACT)和活性期(ACT)禁食状态下进行测量。采用免疫法测定血清E2和P4,采用生物阻抗法测定体成分。采用间接量热法测定脂肪氧化峰(PFO)和引起PFO的强度FATMAX。次日测定峰值摄氧量(V O2PEAK)计算FATMAX。结果:FOL组与LUT组PFO差异无统计学意义(0.40±0.09 g·min-1比0.41±0.10 g·min-1, p = 0.482), INACT组与ACT组PFO差异无统计学意义(0.48±0.12 g·min-1比0.44±0.11 g·min-1, p = 0.099)。FATMAX无相位相关变化(NoOC: FOL 47.3±15.7% vs. LUT 47.7±13.6%,p = 0.727;COC: INACT 57.1±12.3% vs. ACT 52.5±12.2% p = 0.172)。INACT组PFO比FOL组高0.08 g·min-1(95%可信区间:0.02 g·min-1-0.14 g·min-1, p = 0.010), FATMAX比FOL组高9.8% (95% CI: 1.0- 8.7%, p = 0.031)。排除COC组的异常值后,PFO的差异不显著(p = 0.108),但在调整无脂质量和vo2peak后,PFO的差异仍然存在(p = 0.033)。结论:PFO和FATMAX在MC期和COC期之间保持稳定,不需要按周期进行标准化测量。然而,在INACT期间,与FOL相比,COC组的PFO和FATMAX更高,这表明与内源性激素相比,外源性激素对代谢的影响不同。从业者在评估影响底物代谢的因素时应考虑这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信