Continuous Peak Oxygen Uptake Monitoring in High-Intensity Interval Training Minimizes False Responder Rates Compared with Pre- to Posttesting.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Manuel Matzka, Lukas Lauber, Mascha Lenk, Florian Engel, Billy Sperlich
{"title":"Continuous Peak Oxygen Uptake Monitoring in High-Intensity Interval Training Minimizes False Responder Rates Compared with Pre- to Posttesting.","authors":"Manuel Matzka, Lukas Lauber, Mascha Lenk, Florian Engel, Billy Sperlich","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigates the intra- and interindividual time courses of physiological adaptation to high-intensity interval training, comparing single and duplicate pre- to posttesting with session-by-session analysis to more accurately identify \"genuine\" adaptations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen participants (nine men) engaged in repeated 4 × 4 min high-intensity interval training sessions (2 times per week) until a meaningful change in the primary outcome, i.e., relative peak oxygen uptake (V̇O 2peak ), was observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mixed-effects model analysis revealed a significant improvement for V̇O 2peak for both session-by-session (estimate: 0.18, P < 0.01, d = 0.11) analysis and duplicate pre- to postanalysis (estimate: 3.97, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.36). Session-by-session analysis revealed significant variability in physiological responses, with a low coefficient of variation (CV) for V̇O 2peak (3.49% + 1.96%) and estimated maximum stroke volume (SV max ) (3.07% ± 1.92%), and indicating their reliability for detecting small changes. With a CV of 22.14% ± 13.80%, submaximal blood lactate ([BLa] submax ) was the least reliable parameter. With session-by-session analysis, V̇O 2peak was the only parameter displaying 100% positive responders after 9.5 ± 3.8 sessions. Additionally, session-by-session analysis revealed lower proportions of participants with positive adaptations for submaximal V̇O 2 and SV max but higher proportions for submaximal respiratory exchange ratio and rating of perceived exertion compared with pre- to postanalysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the value of longitudinal assessments for understanding the variability and dynamics of training adaptations. By addressing the limitations of pre- to postevaluations, the findings emphasize the importance of frequent monitoring to accurately capture individual responses, thereby advancing strategies for optimizing exercise interventions across diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":"1354-1365"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the intra- and interindividual time courses of physiological adaptation to high-intensity interval training, comparing single and duplicate pre- to posttesting with session-by-session analysis to more accurately identify "genuine" adaptations.

Methods: Seventeen participants (nine men) engaged in repeated 4 × 4 min high-intensity interval training sessions (2 times per week) until a meaningful change in the primary outcome, i.e., relative peak oxygen uptake (V̇O 2peak ), was observed.

Results: Mixed-effects model analysis revealed a significant improvement for V̇O 2peak for both session-by-session (estimate: 0.18, P < 0.01, d = 0.11) analysis and duplicate pre- to postanalysis (estimate: 3.97, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.36). Session-by-session analysis revealed significant variability in physiological responses, with a low coefficient of variation (CV) for V̇O 2peak (3.49% + 1.96%) and estimated maximum stroke volume (SV max ) (3.07% ± 1.92%), and indicating their reliability for detecting small changes. With a CV of 22.14% ± 13.80%, submaximal blood lactate ([BLa] submax ) was the least reliable parameter. With session-by-session analysis, V̇O 2peak was the only parameter displaying 100% positive responders after 9.5 ± 3.8 sessions. Additionally, session-by-session analysis revealed lower proportions of participants with positive adaptations for submaximal V̇O 2 and SV max but higher proportions for submaximal respiratory exchange ratio and rating of perceived exertion compared with pre- to postanalysis.

Conclusions: This study highlights the value of longitudinal assessments for understanding the variability and dynamics of training adaptations. By addressing the limitations of pre- to postevaluations, the findings emphasize the importance of frequent monitoring to accurately capture individual responses, thereby advancing strategies for optimizing exercise interventions across diverse populations.

与前后测试相比,在高强度间歇训练中进行连续峰值摄氧量监测可以最大限度地减少错误反应率。
目的:本研究调查了个体内部和个体间对高强度间歇训练(HIIT)的生理适应时间过程,将单次和重复的前后测试与逐次分析进行比较,以更准确地识别“真正的”适应。方法:17名参与者(9名男性)重复进行4x4分钟的HIIT训练(2次/周),直到观察到主要结果(即相对峰值摄氧量(vo2峰值))发生有意义的变化。结果:混合效应模型分析显示,每次会话的vo2峰值(估计值:0.18,p < 0.01, d = 0.11)和重复的前后分析(估计值:3.97,p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.36)均有显著改善。逐节分析显示,生理反应具有显著的可变性,VO2peak的变异系数(CV)(3.49% + 1.96)和估计最大卒中容量(SVmax)(3.07%±1.92)较低,表明它们在检测微小变化方面的可靠性。CV为22.14%±13.80,亚最大值血乳酸([BLa]submax)是最不可靠的参数。通过逐会话分析,VO2peak是在9.5±3.8次会话后显示100%阳性反应的唯一参数。此外,逐场分析显示,与前后分析相比,参与者对次最大VO2和SVmax的积极适应比例较低,但对次最大呼吸交换率和感知运动等级的积极适应比例较高。结论:本研究强调了纵向评估对理解训练适应的可变性和动态的价值。通过解决前后评估的局限性,研究结果强调了频繁监测以准确捕捉个体反应的重要性,从而推进了在不同人群中优化运动干预的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信