Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model to Identify Women With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease for Proactive Palliative Care.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respirology Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1111/resp.70005
Begashaw Melaku Gebresillassie, John Attia, Dominic Cavenagh, Melissa L Harris
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model to Identify Women With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease for Proactive Palliative Care.","authors":"Begashaw Melaku Gebresillassie, John Attia, Dominic Cavenagh, Melissa L Harris","doi":"10.1111/resp.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Proactive palliative interventions can improve symptom control and quality of life in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, they are often underutilised. This study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model to identify women with COPD in their last year of life to facilitate timely palliative care referrals and interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 1236 women diagnosed with COPD from the 1921-1926 Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health cohort, linked to administrative health records, were analysed. We employed Lasso regression and multivariable logistic regression to select predictors. To assess the predictive performance of the model, we used the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, calibration plot, and calibration metrics. The Youden index was used to establish the optimal cutoff point for risk classification. The clinical utility of the model was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final model to predict 1-year all-cause mortality included six predictors: smoking status, body mass index, needing regular assistance with daily activities, number of supplied medications, duration of illness, and number of hospital admissions. The model performed well, with AUROC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.80-0.85) and showed excellent calibration. Using a cutoff of 56.6% predicted risk, the model achieved a sensitivity of 72.3%, specificity of 77.7%, and accuracy of 75.0%. The DCA indicated that the model provided a greater net benefit for clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our prediction model for identifying women with COPD who may benefit from palliative care has shown robust predictive performance and can be easily applied, but requires external validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21129,"journal":{"name":"Respirology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respirology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.70005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Proactive palliative interventions can improve symptom control and quality of life in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, they are often underutilised. This study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model to identify women with COPD in their last year of life to facilitate timely palliative care referrals and interventions.

Methods: Data from 1236 women diagnosed with COPD from the 1921-1926 Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health cohort, linked to administrative health records, were analysed. We employed Lasso regression and multivariable logistic regression to select predictors. To assess the predictive performance of the model, we used the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, calibration plot, and calibration metrics. The Youden index was used to establish the optimal cutoff point for risk classification. The clinical utility of the model was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: The final model to predict 1-year all-cause mortality included six predictors: smoking status, body mass index, needing regular assistance with daily activities, number of supplied medications, duration of illness, and number of hospital admissions. The model performed well, with AUROC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.80-0.85) and showed excellent calibration. Using a cutoff of 56.6% predicted risk, the model achieved a sensitivity of 72.3%, specificity of 77.7%, and accuracy of 75.0%. The DCA indicated that the model provided a greater net benefit for clinical decision-making.

Conclusion: Our prediction model for identifying women with COPD who may benefit from palliative care has shown robust predictive performance and can be easily applied, but requires external validation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respirology
Respirology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Respirology is a journal of international standing, publishing peer-reviewed articles of scientific excellence in clinical and clinically-relevant experimental respiratory biology and disease. Fields of research include immunology, intensive and critical care, epidemiology, cell and molecular biology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, paediatric respiratory medicine, clinical trials, interventional pulmonology and thoracic surgery. The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and publishes papers in the following categories: Original Articles, Editorials, Reviews, and Correspondences. Respirology is the preferred journal of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, has been adopted as the preferred English journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society and the Taiwan Society of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and is an official journal of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信