Methane emission reduction by adding sulfate to liquid dairy manure.

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Filipe Matos Pereira Lima, Mélodie Laniel, Hambaliou Balde, Robert Gordon, Andrew VanderZaag
{"title":"Methane emission reduction by adding sulfate to liquid dairy manure.","authors":"Filipe Matos Pereira Lima, Mélodie Laniel, Hambaliou Balde, Robert Gordon, Andrew VanderZaag","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dairy farmers are interested in reducing the carbon footprint of milk. Reducing methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions is a key part of this goal, and manure is a significant CH<sub>4</sub> source. Technologies like anaerobic digesters for biogas production are effective; however, adoption rates are slowed by upfront costs and infrastructure needs. Achieving near-term emission reductions needs low-cost alternatives that can be quickly and widely adopted. Previous studies have shown that \"acidification\" of manure by adding sulfuric acid (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) suppressed CH<sub>4</sub> emissions; however, widespread adoption may be hindered by the challenge of handling acid on farms. This laboratory study was performed for 157 days at 24°C, and compared the efficacy of a sulfate-based non-acidic fertilizer (CaSO<sub>4</sub>), and two rates of acidification, one at pH > 7 and one at pH < 7, for a sulfate-based acid (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) and a sulfate-free acid (H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>). Methane suppression by CaSO<sub>4</sub> at multiple rates was also analyzed. Two mechanisms of suppression were observed: acidification had a demonstrable early effect, lowering cumulative CH<sub>4</sub> emission within 40 days by up to 65% for H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and 54% for H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, while sulfate-containing compounds showed increasing suppression after 50 days. Final cumulative CH<sub>4</sub> suppression was up to 63% for CaSO<sub>4</sub> and 91% for H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, while H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> was least effective. These results suggest H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> is highly effective due to the combination of acidity and sulfate. Adding sulfate alone (CaSO<sub>4</sub>) was more effective than adding acid alone (H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>). Hence, sulfate-based additives-like gypsum-may hold promise as an alternative near-term solution for dairy farms to make large CH<sub>4</sub> reductions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dairy farmers are interested in reducing the carbon footprint of milk. Reducing methane (CH4) emissions is a key part of this goal, and manure is a significant CH4 source. Technologies like anaerobic digesters for biogas production are effective; however, adoption rates are slowed by upfront costs and infrastructure needs. Achieving near-term emission reductions needs low-cost alternatives that can be quickly and widely adopted. Previous studies have shown that "acidification" of manure by adding sulfuric acid (H2SO4) suppressed CH4 emissions; however, widespread adoption may be hindered by the challenge of handling acid on farms. This laboratory study was performed for 157 days at 24°C, and compared the efficacy of a sulfate-based non-acidic fertilizer (CaSO4), and two rates of acidification, one at pH > 7 and one at pH < 7, for a sulfate-based acid (H2SO4) and a sulfate-free acid (H3PO4). Methane suppression by CaSO4 at multiple rates was also analyzed. Two mechanisms of suppression were observed: acidification had a demonstrable early effect, lowering cumulative CH4 emission within 40 days by up to 65% for H2SO4 and 54% for H3PO4, while sulfate-containing compounds showed increasing suppression after 50 days. Final cumulative CH4 suppression was up to 63% for CaSO4 and 91% for H2SO4, while H3PO4 was least effective. These results suggest H2SO4 is highly effective due to the combination of acidity and sulfate. Adding sulfate alone (CaSO4) was more effective than adding acid alone (H3PO4). Hence, sulfate-based additives-like gypsum-may hold promise as an alternative near-term solution for dairy farms to make large CH4 reductions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental quality
Journal of environmental quality 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring. Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信