Challenges and opportunities for a new era of neuropsychology training: a trainee survey study.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Joshua T Fox-Fuller, Amanda M Wisinger, Jacob W Koudys, Libby A DesRuisseaux, Brian Cerny, Taylor Rose Schmitt, Annalise Rahman-Filipiak, Kristen L Votruba
{"title":"Challenges and opportunities for a new era of neuropsychology training: a trainee survey study.","authors":"Joshua T Fox-Fuller, Amanda M Wisinger, Jacob W Koudys, Libby A DesRuisseaux, Brian Cerny, Taylor Rose Schmitt, Annalise Rahman-Filipiak, Kristen L Votruba","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2464654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The field of neuropsychology is undergoing notable changes, especially in the context of the Minnesota Update Conference (MNC) guidelines draft development. In late 2023, a group of neuropsychology trainee-leaders, united through the Clinical Neuropsychology Trainee Forum (CNTF), surveyed neuropsychology trainees in the United States and Canada to better understand their needs and their perception of the current training climate.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Survey items were drafted by a CNTF task force consisting of trainee-leaders from major neuropsychology organizations before being refined by four independent neuropsychologists. The survey was distributed via listservs and social media. Survey results were analyzed using frequency descriptives and analyses of variance to compare differences in responses based on demographic and training-related factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents who completed a majority of the survey (<i>n</i> = 220) were primarily female (86%), White (71%), and training in the United States (92%). More than 75% of respondents reported satisfaction with their doctoral program, internship, and/or fellowship. Similarly, 90% and 73% of the respondents, respectively, felt their opinions on the future of the field listened to and/or valued in discussions with peers and supervisors/mentors. However, only 57% of the respondents felt their opinions were valued by neuropsychology organizational leadership, and approximately 30% of the respondents agreed that trainees' opinions were valued during the MNC draft development review period. Another 40% of the respondents were uncertain about trainee perspectives being valued during the MNC process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most neuropsychology trainees are satisfied with their training, yet they expressed concerns about their opinions on the future of the field being heard by neuropsychology leadership. Trainee stakeholder engagement will be important to the vitality of neuropsychology in light of anticipated MNC Guidelines. Recommendations for the field of neuropsychology to support trainees will be discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2464654","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The field of neuropsychology is undergoing notable changes, especially in the context of the Minnesota Update Conference (MNC) guidelines draft development. In late 2023, a group of neuropsychology trainee-leaders, united through the Clinical Neuropsychology Trainee Forum (CNTF), surveyed neuropsychology trainees in the United States and Canada to better understand their needs and their perception of the current training climate.

Method: Survey items were drafted by a CNTF task force consisting of trainee-leaders from major neuropsychology organizations before being refined by four independent neuropsychologists. The survey was distributed via listservs and social media. Survey results were analyzed using frequency descriptives and analyses of variance to compare differences in responses based on demographic and training-related factors.

Results: Respondents who completed a majority of the survey (n = 220) were primarily female (86%), White (71%), and training in the United States (92%). More than 75% of respondents reported satisfaction with their doctoral program, internship, and/or fellowship. Similarly, 90% and 73% of the respondents, respectively, felt their opinions on the future of the field listened to and/or valued in discussions with peers and supervisors/mentors. However, only 57% of the respondents felt their opinions were valued by neuropsychology organizational leadership, and approximately 30% of the respondents agreed that trainees' opinions were valued during the MNC draft development review period. Another 40% of the respondents were uncertain about trainee perspectives being valued during the MNC process.

Conclusions: Most neuropsychology trainees are satisfied with their training, yet they expressed concerns about their opinions on the future of the field being heard by neuropsychology leadership. Trainee stakeholder engagement will be important to the vitality of neuropsychology in light of anticipated MNC Guidelines. Recommendations for the field of neuropsychology to support trainees will be discussed.

神经心理学训练新时代的挑战与机遇:一项实习生调查研究。
神经心理学领域正经历着显著的变化,特别是在明尼苏达州更新会议(MNC)指南草案发展的背景下。2023年末,一群神经心理学培训生领导通过临床神经心理学培训生论坛(CNTF)联合起来,对美国和加拿大的神经心理学培训生进行了调查,以更好地了解他们的需求以及他们对当前培训环境的看法。方法:调查项目由来自主要神经心理学组织的实习领导组成的CNTF工作组起草,然后由四位独立的神经心理学家进行完善。该调查是通过listservs和社交媒体发布的。使用频率描述和方差分析对调查结果进行分析,以比较基于人口统计学和培训相关因素的反应差异。结果:完成大部分调查的受访者(n = 220)主要是女性(86%),白人(71%)和在美国接受培训(92%)。超过75%的受访者表示对他们的博士课程、实习和/或奖学金感到满意。同样,分别有90%和73%的受访者认为,在与同行和主管/导师的讨论中,他们对该领域未来的看法得到了倾听和/或重视。然而,只有57%的受访者认为他们的意见受到神经心理学组织领导的重视,大约30%的受访者同意受训人员的意见在跨国公司草案发展审查期间受到重视。另有40%的受访者不确定在跨国公司过程中实习生的观点是否受到重视。结论:大多数神经心理学学员对他们的培训感到满意,但他们对自己对该领域未来的看法是否被神经心理学领导所听取表示担忧。鉴于预期的跨国公司准则,受训利益相关者的参与对神经心理学的活力至关重要。对神经心理学领域的建议,以支持学员将讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信