Unifying terminology, reporting, and bowel preparation standards in colon capsule endoscopy: Nyborg Consensus.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2495-5427
Ian Io Lei, Anastasios Koulaouzidis, Benedicte Schelde-Olesen, James Turvill, Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia, Emanuele Rondonotti, John N Plevris, Martin Keuchel, Jean-Christophe Saurin, Xavier Dray, Jacob Broder Brodersen, Mark McAlindon, Ervin Toth, Alexander Robertson, Ramesh Arasaradnam
{"title":"Unifying terminology, reporting, and bowel preparation standards in colon capsule endoscopy: Nyborg Consensus.","authors":"Ian Io Lei, Anastasios Koulaouzidis, Benedicte Schelde-Olesen, James Turvill, Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia, Emanuele Rondonotti, John N Plevris, Martin Keuchel, Jean-Christophe Saurin, Xavier Dray, Jacob Broder Brodersen, Mark McAlindon, Ervin Toth, Alexander Robertson, Ramesh Arasaradnam","doi":"10.1055/a-2495-5427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is becoming increasingly popular in Europe. However, development of quality assurance and standardized terminology has not kept pace with clinical integration of this technology. As a result, there are significant variations in reporting standards, highlighting the need for a standardized terminology and framework. We used the RAND process to achieve a consensus of experts to determine the terminology in CCE, bowel cleansing assessment, and quality assurance reporting and future research priorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A panel comprising 14 European CCE experts evaluated 45 statements during the international REFLECT symposium (Nyborg, Denmark) through three survey rounds and face-to-face and virtual discussions in the initial two rounds. Participants anonymously rated statement appropriateness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight consensus statements were developed. Eight statements focus on consistent terminology for confirming CCE-detected polypoid and inflammatory colonic lesions with colonoscopy. To ensure standardization and quality assurance, 13 mandatory fields were recommended for inclusion in a CCE report. Three endorsed reporting methodologies were suggested, emphasizing prompt notification for suspected malignant findings, recommending a generic disclaimer regarding stomach and small bowel visualization intentions, and establishing reporting timelines at an interdepartmental level based on urgency. Four bowel preparation scale-related statements led to the recommendation to adoptithe Colon Capsule CLEansing Assessment and Reporting (CC-CLEAR) scale as the preferred scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study established a framework for terminology, reporting, and assessment of bowel cleansing for CCE. Future research should focus on optimizing bowel preparation regimens and exploring artificial intelligence applications in CCE.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a24955427"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2495-5427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is becoming increasingly popular in Europe. However, development of quality assurance and standardized terminology has not kept pace with clinical integration of this technology. As a result, there are significant variations in reporting standards, highlighting the need for a standardized terminology and framework. We used the RAND process to achieve a consensus of experts to determine the terminology in CCE, bowel cleansing assessment, and quality assurance reporting and future research priorities.

Methods: A panel comprising 14 European CCE experts evaluated 45 statements during the international REFLECT symposium (Nyborg, Denmark) through three survey rounds and face-to-face and virtual discussions in the initial two rounds. Participants anonymously rated statement appropriateness.

Results: Twenty-eight consensus statements were developed. Eight statements focus on consistent terminology for confirming CCE-detected polypoid and inflammatory colonic lesions with colonoscopy. To ensure standardization and quality assurance, 13 mandatory fields were recommended for inclusion in a CCE report. Three endorsed reporting methodologies were suggested, emphasizing prompt notification for suspected malignant findings, recommending a generic disclaimer regarding stomach and small bowel visualization intentions, and establishing reporting timelines at an interdepartmental level based on urgency. Four bowel preparation scale-related statements led to the recommendation to adoptithe Colon Capsule CLEansing Assessment and Reporting (CC-CLEAR) scale as the preferred scale.

Conclusions: This study established a framework for terminology, reporting, and assessment of bowel cleansing for CCE. Future research should focus on optimizing bowel preparation regimens and exploring artificial intelligence applications in CCE.

统一结肠胶囊内窥镜的术语、报告和肠准备标准:尼伯格共识。
背景和研究目的:结肠胶囊内窥镜检查(CCE)在欧洲越来越流行。然而,质量保证和标准化术语的发展并没有跟上该技术的临床整合。因此,报告标准有很大差异,突出表明需要一个标准化的术语和框架。我们使用RAND流程来达成专家共识,以确定CCE的术语、肠道清洁评估、质量保证报告和未来的研究重点。方法:一个由14名欧洲CCE专家组成的小组通过三轮调查和前两轮的面对面和虚拟讨论,评估了国际REFLECT研讨会(丹麦尼堡)期间的45份声明。参与者匿名评价陈述的适当性。结果:制定了28项共识声明。八项声明集中于结肠镜检查确认cce检测到的息肉和炎性结肠病变的一致术语。为确保标准化和质量保证,建议将13个必填项列入CCE报告。建议了三种认可的报告方法,强调对疑似恶性发现的及时通知,建议对胃和小肠可视化意图的通用免责声明,并根据紧急情况建立跨部门一级的报告时间表。四项与肠道准备量表相关的陈述导致建议采用结肠胶囊清洁评估和报告(CC-CLEAR)量表作为首选量表。结论:本研究建立了CCE的术语、报告和评估肠道清洁的框架。未来的研究应侧重于优化肠道准备方案和探索人工智能在CCE中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信