Safety of intrabiliary radiofrequency ablation in cases of residual and recurrent neoplasia after endoscopic papillectomy.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2487-2598
Yanis Dahel, Fabrice Caillol, Jean-Philippe Ratone, Christophe Zemmour, Anais Palen, Jonathan Garnier, Jacques Ewald, Olivier Turrini, Solene Hoibian, Marc Giovannini
{"title":"Safety of intrabiliary radiofrequency ablation in cases of residual and recurrent neoplasia after endoscopic papillectomy.","authors":"Yanis Dahel, Fabrice Caillol, Jean-Philippe Ratone, Christophe Zemmour, Anais Palen, Jonathan Garnier, Jacques Ewald, Olivier Turrini, Solene Hoibian, Marc Giovannini","doi":"10.1055/a-2487-2598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Intrabiliary radiofrequency ablation (IB-RFA) is a therapeutic option for cases of positive margin or recurrence after endoscopic papillectomy (EP) for superficial neoplasia. We report our experience concerning safety and efficiency of IB-RFA.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a single tertiary center retrospective study. All patients who underwent IB-RFA indicated for residual or recurrent neoplasia after EP were included. We assessed morbidity (<30 days) and late complications (>30 days). Secondary outcomes were clinical success and late recurrence (absence of recurrence at the papillectomy site 12 months after IB-RFA and recurrence beyond 12 months, respectively).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five patients were included and underwent IB-RFA for deep positive margins (20/25, 80%) or relapse (5/25, 20%) and 40 sessions were delivered. The morbidity rate was 8% (2/24) (1 pancreatitis, 1 bleeding). Acute pancreatitis was significantly more common in the absence of pancreatic stenting (0% vs. 22%, <i>P</i> =0.046). One patient for whom pancreatic stenting failed died from acute severe pancreatitis in the first month (mortality rate=4%). Late complications occurred in 12 of 24 patients (50%) concerning only biliary stricture, all of which were managed endoscopically without sequelae. The clinical success rate was 92% (22/24), and late recurrence occurred in two of 24 patients (8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IB-RFA is relatively safe and efficient in cases of residual or recurrent neoplasia after EP and is an alternative to surgery in well-selected cases. Biliary stricture occurred frequently (50%) but could be managed endoscopically without sequelae in all cases. In cases of pancreatic stenting failure and because of the risk of severe and potentially lethal acute pancreatitis, IB-RFA should be postponed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a24872598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2487-2598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: Intrabiliary radiofrequency ablation (IB-RFA) is a therapeutic option for cases of positive margin or recurrence after endoscopic papillectomy (EP) for superficial neoplasia. We report our experience concerning safety and efficiency of IB-RFA.

Patients and methods: This was a single tertiary center retrospective study. All patients who underwent IB-RFA indicated for residual or recurrent neoplasia after EP were included. We assessed morbidity (<30 days) and late complications (>30 days). Secondary outcomes were clinical success and late recurrence (absence of recurrence at the papillectomy site 12 months after IB-RFA and recurrence beyond 12 months, respectively).

Results: Twenty-five patients were included and underwent IB-RFA for deep positive margins (20/25, 80%) or relapse (5/25, 20%) and 40 sessions were delivered. The morbidity rate was 8% (2/24) (1 pancreatitis, 1 bleeding). Acute pancreatitis was significantly more common in the absence of pancreatic stenting (0% vs. 22%, P =0.046). One patient for whom pancreatic stenting failed died from acute severe pancreatitis in the first month (mortality rate=4%). Late complications occurred in 12 of 24 patients (50%) concerning only biliary stricture, all of which were managed endoscopically without sequelae. The clinical success rate was 92% (22/24), and late recurrence occurred in two of 24 patients (8%).

Conclusions: IB-RFA is relatively safe and efficient in cases of residual or recurrent neoplasia after EP and is an alternative to surgery in well-selected cases. Biliary stricture occurred frequently (50%) but could be managed endoscopically without sequelae in all cases. In cases of pancreatic stenting failure and because of the risk of severe and potentially lethal acute pancreatitis, IB-RFA should be postponed.

胆道内射频消融治疗内镜乳头切除术后肿瘤残留及复发的安全性。
背景和研究目的:胆道内射频消融(IB-RFA)是内镜下乳头切除术(EP)后边缘阳性或复发的浅表肿瘤患者的治疗选择。我们报告我们在IB-RFA的安全性和有效性方面的经验。患者和方法:这是一项单三级中心回顾性研究。所有在EP后因肿瘤残留或复发而行IB-RFA的患者均被纳入研究。我们评估发病率(30天)。次要结果是临床成功和晚期复发(分别为IB-RFA术后12个月乳头切除术部位无复发和12个月以上复发)。结果:25例患者因深阳性切缘(20/ 25,80%)或复发(5/ 25,20%)接受IB-RFA治疗,共进行了40次治疗。发病率为8%(2/24)(1例胰腺炎,1例出血)。急性胰腺炎在没有胰支架置入的情况下更为常见(0%比22%,P =0.046)。1例胰腺支架置入失败的患者在第一个月内死于急性重症胰腺炎(死亡率=4%)。24例患者中有12例(50%)发生晚期并发症,仅涉及胆道狭窄,所有患者均经内镜处理,无后遗症。临床成功率92%(22/24),24例患者中有2例(8%)出现晚期复发。结论:IB-RFA对于EP后肿瘤残留或复发的病例是相对安全有效的,并且在精心挑选的病例中可以替代手术。胆道狭窄经常发生(50%),但所有病例均可在内镜下处理,无后遗症。在胰腺支架植入失败的情况下,由于严重和潜在致命的急性胰腺炎的风险,IB-RFA应该推迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信