Endoscopic closure using a dedicated device following gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: Multicenter, prospective, observational pilot study.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2503-1684
Kazuo Shiotsuki, Kohei Takizawa, Yohei Nose, Yuki Kondo, Hitoshi Homma, Taisuke Inada, Mao Daikaku, Kosuke Maehara, Shin-Ichiro Fukuda, Hironori Aoki, Yorinobu Sumida, Hirotada Akiho, Jiro Watari, Kiyokazu Nakajima
{"title":"Endoscopic closure using a dedicated device following gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: Multicenter, prospective, observational pilot study.","authors":"Kazuo Shiotsuki, Kohei Takizawa, Yohei Nose, Yuki Kondo, Hitoshi Homma, Taisuke Inada, Mao Daikaku, Kosuke Maehara, Shin-Ichiro Fukuda, Hironori Aoki, Yorinobu Sumida, Hirotada Akiho, Jiro Watari, Kiyokazu Nakajima","doi":"10.1055/a-2503-1684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Development of a simple, optimized closure method for mucosal defects left by gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is warranted. Herein, we developed a novel and dedicated closure device called FLEXLOOP and aimed to assess feasibility and safety of the closure using FLEXLOOP following gastric ESD.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolled patients clinically diagnosed with gastric neoplasms < 30 mm in size. Following gastric ESD, closure of the mucosal defect was performed using a FLEXLOOP with standard clips. The primary outcome was the complete closure rate. The secondary outcomes were procedure time, number of clips, sustained closure rate on second-look endoscopy on postoperative days (PODs) 5 to 7, and rate of post-ESD bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 35 patients were included in this study. The median specimen size was 32 mm. The mucosal defect was completely closed in 31 patients (89%; 95% confidence interval, 73%-99%) and incompletely closed in four patients (11%). Median closure time was 11 minutes and median number of clips was 10. Second-look endoscopy performed on PODs 5 to 7 demonstrated sustained, partially sustained, and unsustained closures in seven (20%), 22 (63%), and six patients (17%), respectively. Post-ESD bleeding and complications related to FLEXLOOP were not observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Closure using FLEXLOOP is feasible and safe. Our technique using this new device can be an attractive option for more easily closing mucosal defects. However, further clinical research is warranted to confirm that this technique can prevent delayed complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a25031684"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2503-1684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: Development of a simple, optimized closure method for mucosal defects left by gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is warranted. Herein, we developed a novel and dedicated closure device called FLEXLOOP and aimed to assess feasibility and safety of the closure using FLEXLOOP following gastric ESD.

Patients and methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolled patients clinically diagnosed with gastric neoplasms < 30 mm in size. Following gastric ESD, closure of the mucosal defect was performed using a FLEXLOOP with standard clips. The primary outcome was the complete closure rate. The secondary outcomes were procedure time, number of clips, sustained closure rate on second-look endoscopy on postoperative days (PODs) 5 to 7, and rate of post-ESD bleeding.

Results: Overall, 35 patients were included in this study. The median specimen size was 32 mm. The mucosal defect was completely closed in 31 patients (89%; 95% confidence interval, 73%-99%) and incompletely closed in four patients (11%). Median closure time was 11 minutes and median number of clips was 10. Second-look endoscopy performed on PODs 5 to 7 demonstrated sustained, partially sustained, and unsustained closures in seven (20%), 22 (63%), and six patients (17%), respectively. Post-ESD bleeding and complications related to FLEXLOOP were not observed.

Conclusions: Closure using FLEXLOOP is feasible and safe. Our technique using this new device can be an attractive option for more easily closing mucosal defects. However, further clinical research is warranted to confirm that this technique can prevent delayed complications.

胃内镜下粘膜剥离后使用专用装置进行内镜闭合:多中心、前瞻性、观察性先导研究。
背景与研究目的:开发一种简单、优化的胃内镜下粘膜剥离(ESD)术后粘膜缺损闭合方法是必要的。在此,我们开发了一种名为FLEXLOOP的新型专用闭合装置,旨在评估胃ESD后使用FLEXLOOP闭合的可行性和安全性。患者和方法:这项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究纳入了临床诊断为胃肿瘤< 30mm的患者。在胃ESD后,使用带标准夹子的FLEXLOOP闭合粘膜缺损。主要观察指标为完全闭合率。次要结果为手术时间、夹片数量、术后5 ~ 7天二次内镜持续闭合率和esd后出血率。结果:本研究共纳入35例患者。中位试样尺寸为32毫米。31例患者粘膜缺损完全闭合(89%;95%可信区间,73%-99%),4例(11%)不完全闭合。中位闭合时间为11分钟,中位夹数为10个。在PODs 5至7上进行的二次内窥镜检查分别显示7例(20%)、22例(63%)和6例(17%)患者持续、部分持续和非持续闭合。未观察到esd后出血和FLEXLOOP相关并发症。结论:采用FLEXLOOP缝合是可行且安全的。我们使用这种新装置的技术可以更容易地关闭粘膜缺陷。然而,需要进一步的临床研究来证实该技术可以预防延迟性并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信