Digestive endoscopic removal of cocaine pellets: Safety evaluation.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-01-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2507-7812
Alolia Aboikoni, Marion Wallyn, Timothée Bonifay, Piseth Chhorn, Balandougou Sylla, Marthe Alogo A Nwatsok, Alix Becar, Paul Ngock Dime, Thi Thu Nga Nguyen, Alexis Fremery, Lorenzo Garzelli, Houari Aissaoui, Magaly Zappa, Dominique Louvel
{"title":"Digestive endoscopic removal of cocaine pellets: Safety evaluation.","authors":"Alolia Aboikoni, Marion Wallyn, Timothée Bonifay, Piseth Chhorn, Balandougou Sylla, Marthe Alogo A Nwatsok, Alix Becar, Paul Ngock Dime, Thi Thu Nga Nguyen, Alexis Fremery, Lorenzo Garzelli, Houari Aissaoui, Magaly Zappa, Dominique Louvel","doi":"10.1055/a-2507-7812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Removal of cocaine pellets by endoscopy is the subject of much debate, due to the supposed risk of rupture. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of digestive endoscopic removal of cocaine pellets.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a single-center, observational, retrospective study conducted at the Cayenne Hospital in French Guiana from July 2015 to May 2023. We included patients in whom digestive endoscopy was performed for delayed evacuation despite conservative treatment defined by persistence of pellets on imaging from the third day of hospitalization. Endoscopy was performed only if the pellets present were at low risk of rupture (type 4 according to the classification by Pidoto in 2002). We collected demographic, imaging, endoscopic and follow-up data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 111 patients, 75% of whom were male. Median age was 25 years (range, 20-33). Imaging was performed in 99% of cases. On imaging prior to endoscopy, pellets were found mainly in the stomach (28%), right colon (28%), left colon (30%), and sigmoid (31%). Median time to endoscopy was 3 days (range, 2.5-4). Median number of pellets extracted endoscopically was one (range, 1-4). The material used was mainly endoscopic baskets (60%). No patient presented any per or post-endoscopic complications. No pellets ruptured during extraction. There was no sign of cocaine intoxication during or after endoscopy. The success rate for pellet removal was 92% during the first endoscopy and 100% during the second endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic removal of micro-industrially-produced cocaine pellets seems to be a safe and effective method. Therefore, endoscopy has a place in management of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a25077812"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827539/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2507-7812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: Removal of cocaine pellets by endoscopy is the subject of much debate, due to the supposed risk of rupture. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of digestive endoscopic removal of cocaine pellets.

Patients and methods: This was a single-center, observational, retrospective study conducted at the Cayenne Hospital in French Guiana from July 2015 to May 2023. We included patients in whom digestive endoscopy was performed for delayed evacuation despite conservative treatment defined by persistence of pellets on imaging from the third day of hospitalization. Endoscopy was performed only if the pellets present were at low risk of rupture (type 4 according to the classification by Pidoto in 2002). We collected demographic, imaging, endoscopic and follow-up data.

Results: We included 111 patients, 75% of whom were male. Median age was 25 years (range, 20-33). Imaging was performed in 99% of cases. On imaging prior to endoscopy, pellets were found mainly in the stomach (28%), right colon (28%), left colon (30%), and sigmoid (31%). Median time to endoscopy was 3 days (range, 2.5-4). Median number of pellets extracted endoscopically was one (range, 1-4). The material used was mainly endoscopic baskets (60%). No patient presented any per or post-endoscopic complications. No pellets ruptured during extraction. There was no sign of cocaine intoxication during or after endoscopy. The success rate for pellet removal was 92% during the first endoscopy and 100% during the second endoscopy.

Conclusions: Endoscopic removal of micro-industrially-produced cocaine pellets seems to be a safe and effective method. Therefore, endoscopy has a place in management of these patients.

消化内镜移除可卡因颗粒:安全性评价。
背景和研究目的:由于假定的破裂风险,通过内窥镜去除可卡因颗粒是许多争论的主题。本研究旨在评价消化内镜下取出可卡因颗粒的安全性。患者和方法:这是一项单中心、观察性、回顾性研究,于2015年7月至2023年5月在法属圭亚那卡宴医院进行。我们纳入了那些接受了保守治疗的患者,这些患者从住院第三天开始就接受了消化内窥镜检查,以延迟排空。只有在小球破裂风险较低的情况下才进行内窥镜检查(根据2002年Pidoto的分类为4型)。我们收集了人口统计、影像、内窥镜和随访数据。结果:纳入111例患者,75%为男性。中位年龄为25岁(范围20-33岁)。99%的病例行影像学检查。在内镜检查前的影像学检查中,颗粒主要出现在胃(28%)、右结肠(28%)、左结肠(30%)和乙状结肠(31%)。到内窥镜检查的中位时间为3天(范围2.5-4天)。内镜下取出的颗粒中位数为1个(范围1-4)。所用材料主要为内镜筐(60%)。无患者出现任何内镜下或内镜后并发症。在提取过程中无颗粒破裂。在内窥镜检查期间或之后没有可卡因中毒的迹象。第一次内镜下颗粒去除成功率为92%,第二次内镜下为100%。结论:内镜下取出微工业生产的可卡因颗粒似乎是一种安全有效的方法。因此,内窥镜检查在这些患者的治疗中占有一席之地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信