The effect of resistance training on blood pressure and resting heart rate in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 6.1 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ruihao Lin , Kairan Yang , Hengtao Guo, Xiang Zhang
{"title":"The effect of resistance training on blood pressure and resting heart rate in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Ruihao Lin ,&nbsp;Kairan Yang ,&nbsp;Hengtao Guo,&nbsp;Xiang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This <em>meta</em>-analysis assessed the impacts of resistance training on hemodynamic outcomes, including blood pressure and heart rate, in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Four databases were searched following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing resistance training to usual care were included if they evaluated systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), heart rate, and maximum oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2max</sub>) in adults with T2D. Random-effects models were used to calculate mean differences, with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Twenty-six RCTs were included. Resistance training significantly reduced SBP by −4.13 mmHg (95 % CI: −6.40, −1.85; p = 0.0004) and DBP by −2.03 mmHg (95 % CI: −3.69, −0.38; p = 0.02), with greater reductions in interventions lasting over 12 weeks. Resting heart rate decreased by −3.17 bpm (95 % CI: −6.33, −0.01; p = 0.05) and VO<sub>2max</sub> improved by 0.27 ml/kg/min (95 % CI: 0.02, 0.53; p = 0.04). Meta-regression revealed that intervention duration, session frequency, and study quality did not significantly explain the observed heterogeneity. Resistance training effectively improves hemodynamic outcomes T2D patients, but high heterogeneity in blood pressure outcomes and limited subgroup data on specific subgroups (e.g., women) restrict generalizability. Further research should explore heterogeneity sources and optimize resistance training protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 112016"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822725000300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This meta-analysis assessed the impacts of resistance training on hemodynamic outcomes, including blood pressure and heart rate, in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Four databases were searched following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing resistance training to usual care were included if they evaluated systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), heart rate, and maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) in adults with T2D. Random-effects models were used to calculate mean differences, with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Twenty-six RCTs were included. Resistance training significantly reduced SBP by −4.13 mmHg (95 % CI: −6.40, −1.85; p = 0.0004) and DBP by −2.03 mmHg (95 % CI: −3.69, −0.38; p = 0.02), with greater reductions in interventions lasting over 12 weeks. Resting heart rate decreased by −3.17 bpm (95 % CI: −6.33, −0.01; p = 0.05) and VO2max improved by 0.27 ml/kg/min (95 % CI: 0.02, 0.53; p = 0.04). Meta-regression revealed that intervention duration, session frequency, and study quality did not significantly explain the observed heterogeneity. Resistance training effectively improves hemodynamic outcomes T2D patients, but high heterogeneity in blood pressure outcomes and limited subgroup data on specific subgroups (e.g., women) restrict generalizability. Further research should explore heterogeneity sources and optimize resistance training protocols.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信