Comparison of Autologous Flap-Supported vs. Stent-Supported Preventive Ileostomy in Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Low Rectal Cancer.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Xing Liu, Weilin Wang, Meng Li, Lei Gao
{"title":"Comparison of Autologous Flap-Supported vs. Stent-Supported Preventive Ileostomy in Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Low Rectal Cancer.","authors":"Xing Liu, Weilin Wang, Meng Li, Lei Gao","doi":"10.62713/aic.3703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study compared the clinical efficacy of preventive ileostomy supported by autologous flaps versus stents in laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-four patients diagnosed with low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical resection in Fuyang Women's and Children's Hospital between April 2020 and December 2023 were included in this study. Based on the intraoperative support method, the patients were divided into a control group (n = 30) receiving stent support and a flap support group (n = 34) undergoing autologous flap support. Surgical outcomes, perioperative indicators, and postoperative complications were analyzed and compared between the groups. Patients were followed up for six months to evaluate recovery outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in operative time, total duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization costs between the two groups (p < 0.05). Postoperative levels of inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT), were elevated at 2, 4, and 6 days after surgery in both groups, while erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and prealbumin (PA) levels decreased in both groups compared to preoperative levels (p < 0.05). Notably, the flap support group demonstrated significantly lower CRP, IL-6, PCT, and ESR levels and higher PA levels at the same time points compared to the control group at 2, 4, and 6 days after surgery (p < 0.05). The complication rate in the flap support group (2.94%) was significantly lower than in the control group (20.00%) (p < 0.05). During the follow-up period, no cases of permanent fistula were observed in the flap support group, while the control group reported a 13.33% incidence of permanent fistula, indicating a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preventive ileostomy supported by autologous skin flaps offers advantages in laparoscopic radical resection for low rectal cancer. This approach simplifies the procedure, eliminates the need for secondary stent removal, reduces postoperative complications, and improves overall safety and recovery outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"96 2","pages":"188-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study compared the clinical efficacy of preventive ileostomy supported by autologous flaps versus stents in laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer.

Methods: Sixty-four patients diagnosed with low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical resection in Fuyang Women's and Children's Hospital between April 2020 and December 2023 were included in this study. Based on the intraoperative support method, the patients were divided into a control group (n = 30) receiving stent support and a flap support group (n = 34) undergoing autologous flap support. Surgical outcomes, perioperative indicators, and postoperative complications were analyzed and compared between the groups. Patients were followed up for six months to evaluate recovery outcomes.

Results: Significant differences were observed in operative time, total duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization costs between the two groups (p < 0.05). Postoperative levels of inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT), were elevated at 2, 4, and 6 days after surgery in both groups, while erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and prealbumin (PA) levels decreased in both groups compared to preoperative levels (p < 0.05). Notably, the flap support group demonstrated significantly lower CRP, IL-6, PCT, and ESR levels and higher PA levels at the same time points compared to the control group at 2, 4, and 6 days after surgery (p < 0.05). The complication rate in the flap support group (2.94%) was significantly lower than in the control group (20.00%) (p < 0.05). During the follow-up period, no cases of permanent fistula were observed in the flap support group, while the control group reported a 13.33% incidence of permanent fistula, indicating a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Preventive ileostomy supported by autologous skin flaps offers advantages in laparoscopic radical resection for low rectal cancer. This approach simplifies the procedure, eliminates the need for secondary stent removal, reduces postoperative complications, and improves overall safety and recovery outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信