Clinical Outcomes of DAMIS Traction Table-Assisted Anterior Approach versus Posterolateral Approach on Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Femoral Head Necrosis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Mao-Sen Lu, Yan-Ping Zhang, Yong-Jie Jiao, Long Wang, Xin Meng, Jie Zhang, Min Du, Han-Zhen Hu, Jian-Wei Du, Chang-Feng Liu
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of DAMIS Traction Table-Assisted Anterior Approach versus Posterolateral Approach on Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Femoral Head Necrosis.","authors":"Mao-Sen Lu, Yan-Ping Zhang, Yong-Jie Jiao, Long Wang, Xin Meng, Jie Zhang, Min Du, Han-Zhen Hu, Jian-Wei Du, Chang-Feng Liu","doi":"10.62713/aic.3829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Femoral head necrosis often leads to hip joint dysfunction, which can be effectively treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study compares the clinical outcomes of direct anterior minimally invasive surgery (DAMIS) traction table-assisted anterior approach and the traditional posterolateral approach (PLA) on THA for femoral head necrosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 150 patients with femoral head necrosis, admitted between September 2019 and May 2022, were included in this study. In this sample, 68 patients underwent THA via the PLA (control group), while the remaining 82 patients were treated with THA using the DAMIS traction table-assisted anterior approach (observation group). The surgical-related indicators, postoperative pain scores, Harris hip scores (HHS), and rates of complication incidence between the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in surgery time between the two groups (p = 0.054). The observation group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.018), shorter incision length (p = 0.001), and significantly shorter time elapsed to first out-of-bed activity (p = 0.016) and shorter hospital stay compared to the control group (p = 0.001). The postoperative pain scores in the observation group were significantly lower than in the control group (p = 0.001), and the HHS at 2 weeks and 4 weeks after surgery were significantly higher in the observation group (p < 0.05). The overall complication rate in the observation group was significantly lower than in the control group (p = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DAMIS traction table-assisted anterior approach for THA demonstrates clinical advantages in the treatment of femoral head necrosis, effectively accelerating postoperative recovery and reducing the occurrence of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"96 2","pages":"160-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3829","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Femoral head necrosis often leads to hip joint dysfunction, which can be effectively treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study compares the clinical outcomes of direct anterior minimally invasive surgery (DAMIS) traction table-assisted anterior approach and the traditional posterolateral approach (PLA) on THA for femoral head necrosis.

Methods: A total of 150 patients with femoral head necrosis, admitted between September 2019 and May 2022, were included in this study. In this sample, 68 patients underwent THA via the PLA (control group), while the remaining 82 patients were treated with THA using the DAMIS traction table-assisted anterior approach (observation group). The surgical-related indicators, postoperative pain scores, Harris hip scores (HHS), and rates of complication incidence between the two groups were compared.

Results: There were no significant differences in surgery time between the two groups (p = 0.054). The observation group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.018), shorter incision length (p = 0.001), and significantly shorter time elapsed to first out-of-bed activity (p = 0.016) and shorter hospital stay compared to the control group (p = 0.001). The postoperative pain scores in the observation group were significantly lower than in the control group (p = 0.001), and the HHS at 2 weeks and 4 weeks after surgery were significantly higher in the observation group (p < 0.05). The overall complication rate in the observation group was significantly lower than in the control group (p = 0.011).

Conclusions: DAMIS traction table-assisted anterior approach for THA demonstrates clinical advantages in the treatment of femoral head necrosis, effectively accelerating postoperative recovery and reducing the occurrence of complications.

DAMIS牵引台辅助前路与后外侧入路治疗股骨头坏死全髋关节置换术的临床效果。
目的:股骨头坏死常导致髋关节功能障碍,全髋关节置换术可有效治疗股骨头坏死。本研究比较了直接前路微创手术(DAMIS)牵引台辅助前路入路与传统后外侧入路(PLA)治疗股骨头坏死的临床效果。方法:本研究纳入2019年9月至2022年5月收治的150例股骨头坏死患者。本例中,68例患者经PLA行THA(对照组),其余82例患者采用DAMIS牵引台辅助前路行THA(观察组)。比较两组手术相关指标、术后疼痛评分、Harris髋关节评分(HHS)及并发症发生率。结果:两组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.054)。与对照组相比,观察组术中出血量显著减少(p = 0.018),切口长度显著缩短(p = 0.001),首次下床活动时间显著缩短(p = 0.016),住院时间显著缩短(p = 0.001)。观察组患者术后疼痛评分显著低于对照组(p = 0.001),术后2周、4周HHS评分显著高于对照组(p < 0.05)。观察组总并发症发生率显著低于对照组(p = 0.011)。结论:DAMIS牵引台辅助前路入路治疗股骨头坏死具有临床优势,可有效加速术后恢复,减少并发症的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信