The impact of combination chemotherapy administration on prognostic outcomes in stage II and III gastric cancer: a comprehensive analysis utilizing propensity score matching.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-01-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/WVYP2688
Yifan Li, Haoliang Zhao
{"title":"The impact of combination chemotherapy administration on prognostic outcomes in stage II and III gastric cancer: a comprehensive analysis utilizing propensity score matching.","authors":"Yifan Li, Haoliang Zhao","doi":"10.62347/WVYP2688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Limited data are available on the effects of combined and intravenous or oral chemotherapy on the survival of patients who have undergone D2 gastrectomy for cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved 1314 patients who participated in a trial that followed D2 gastrectomy with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following propensity score matching (PSM), the results indicated that contrary to expectations, combined chemotherapy administration was associated with poorer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at the 5-year mark for stage II gastric cancer, with log-rank <i>P</i> values of 0.005 for OS (83.6% vs. 68.8%) and 0.005 for PFS (71.6% vs. 61.5%). Significant differences were observed in the recurrence rate (P < 0.001) and local-regional recurrence (P = 0.009), although no significant difference was found for distant metastasis (P = 0.146). For stage III gastric cancer, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the combination of oral and intravenous chemotherapy was inferior to single-modality chemotherapy for PFS (P = 0.006). However, it did not differ significantly from single therapy in OS (P = 0.257). Notable discrepancies were evident in the recurrence rate (P < 0.001), distant metastasis (P < 0.001), and local-regional recurrence (P = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that the concurrent use of oral and intravenous chemotherapy after D2 gastrectomy does not enhance the prognosis for gastric cancer patients compared to using either modality alone. Instead, it appears to increase the risk of disease progression for stage III patients and the likelihood of recurrence for both stages II and III of gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 1","pages":"377-395"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/WVYP2688","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Limited data are available on the effects of combined and intravenous or oral chemotherapy on the survival of patients who have undergone D2 gastrectomy for cancer.

Methods: This study involved 1314 patients who participated in a trial that followed D2 gastrectomy with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Results: Following propensity score matching (PSM), the results indicated that contrary to expectations, combined chemotherapy administration was associated with poorer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at the 5-year mark for stage II gastric cancer, with log-rank P values of 0.005 for OS (83.6% vs. 68.8%) and 0.005 for PFS (71.6% vs. 61.5%). Significant differences were observed in the recurrence rate (P < 0.001) and local-regional recurrence (P = 0.009), although no significant difference was found for distant metastasis (P = 0.146). For stage III gastric cancer, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the combination of oral and intravenous chemotherapy was inferior to single-modality chemotherapy for PFS (P = 0.006). However, it did not differ significantly from single therapy in OS (P = 0.257). Notable discrepancies were evident in the recurrence rate (P < 0.001), distant metastasis (P < 0.001), and local-regional recurrence (P = 0.003).

Conclusions: The findings suggest that the concurrent use of oral and intravenous chemotherapy after D2 gastrectomy does not enhance the prognosis for gastric cancer patients compared to using either modality alone. Instead, it appears to increase the risk of disease progression for stage III patients and the likelihood of recurrence for both stages II and III of gastric cancer.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信