COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BREAST MILK, DRY-KEEPING, AND USE OF CHLORHEXIDINE IN UMBILICAL CORD CARE.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Emine Ela Küçük, Dilek Küçük Alemdar, Kürşad Yapar, Şahin Direkel, Nejla Ömerbeyoğlu, Ülker Başak
{"title":"COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BREAST MILK, DRY-KEEPING, AND USE OF CHLORHEXIDINE IN UMBILICAL CORD CARE.","authors":"Emine Ela Küçük, Dilek Küçük Alemdar, Kürşad Yapar, Şahin Direkel, Nejla Ömerbeyoğlu, Ülker Başak","doi":"10.20471/acc.2024.63.01.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research was conducted as a randomized study with the objective of determining the effects of breast milk, dry-keeping, and chlorhexidine methods used in umbilical cord care on the time of umbilical cord separation and on omphalitis and bacterial flora development. The study was carried out in 97 newborns divided into three groups, as follows: breast milk was used for umbilical cord care in group 1 of 32 newborns, dry-keeping was applied in group 2 of 35 newborns, and chlorhexidine was applied in group 3 of 30 newborns. Infants were assigned to three subgroups through randomization performed using a computer program. Swabs for culture were obtained from umbilical cord on postnatal day 2 and day 5. While difference in the results of the care methods applied was not significant on day 2, significant difference in the results was found on day 5. It was determined that there was no bacterial growth in 46.7% of the chlorhexidine group, while maximum bacterial growth was recorded in the dry-keeping group. In the chlorhexidine group, timing of umbilical cord separation was significantly shorter than in other groups. Study results indicated that the most effective method was the use of chlorhexidine. Dry-keeping can be risky since it was inefficient in preventing umbilical colonization, and in cases where the cost of chlorhexidine is an issue, the use of breast milk can be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":7072,"journal":{"name":"Acta clinica Croatica","volume":"63 1","pages":"11-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta clinica Croatica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2024.63.01.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research was conducted as a randomized study with the objective of determining the effects of breast milk, dry-keeping, and chlorhexidine methods used in umbilical cord care on the time of umbilical cord separation and on omphalitis and bacterial flora development. The study was carried out in 97 newborns divided into three groups, as follows: breast milk was used for umbilical cord care in group 1 of 32 newborns, dry-keeping was applied in group 2 of 35 newborns, and chlorhexidine was applied in group 3 of 30 newborns. Infants were assigned to three subgroups through randomization performed using a computer program. Swabs for culture were obtained from umbilical cord on postnatal day 2 and day 5. While difference in the results of the care methods applied was not significant on day 2, significant difference in the results was found on day 5. It was determined that there was no bacterial growth in 46.7% of the chlorhexidine group, while maximum bacterial growth was recorded in the dry-keeping group. In the chlorhexidine group, timing of umbilical cord separation was significantly shorter than in other groups. Study results indicated that the most effective method was the use of chlorhexidine. Dry-keeping can be risky since it was inefficient in preventing umbilical colonization, and in cases where the cost of chlorhexidine is an issue, the use of breast milk can be recommended.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta clinica Croatica
Acta clinica Croatica 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Clinica Croatica is a peer reviewed general medical journal that publishes original articles that advance and improve medical science and practice and that serve the purpose of transfer of original and valuable information to journal readers. Acta Clinica Croatica is published in English four times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信