{"title":"The diagnosis of DIC: a current overview.","authors":"Hongyu Yang, Xiaochun Ma, Xu Li","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1502628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The name of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and its diagnostic criteria remain controversial. DIC is a clinical syndrome caused by a variety of etiologies, which determines its high heterogeneity. It is inappropriate to adopt the same diagnostic criteria. DIC has its common characteristics. First, in most DIC, thrombosis and bleeding coexist. Second, DIC is a dynamic process. Third, endothelial cell injury and systemic coagulation activation are the core of DIC. Fourth, DIC is an initiating factor of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). There are still controversies about the diagnostic criteria of DIC. First, it relies on clinical manifestations and laboratory tests, which cannot reflect pathophysiology. Second, the clinical manifestations were not sensitive or specific. Third, there is a lack of sensitive biomarkers. Fourth, the parameters in the current diagnostic criteria cannot fully reflect the actual coagulation function. Fifth, it is obviously inappropriate to use the same scoring system for diagnosis of clinical syndromes with different etiologies and pathophysiology. Therefore, it is urgent to re-establish the diagnostic criteria for DIC. In recent years, the understanding of DIC has been continuously improved, including the in-depth understanding of the pathogenesis, the classification of coagulation phenotypes, and the development of the \"two-step\" diagnosis of DIC, etc. All of these contribute to the establishment of new diagnostic criteria for DIC. In conclusion, it is necessary to develop personalized diagnostic criteria based on etiology, reflecting pathophysiological mechanisms, establishing clear cut-off values for parameters, being clinical applicable, being globally unified, and most importantly, being able to identify therapeutic targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1502628"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1502628","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The name of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and its diagnostic criteria remain controversial. DIC is a clinical syndrome caused by a variety of etiologies, which determines its high heterogeneity. It is inappropriate to adopt the same diagnostic criteria. DIC has its common characteristics. First, in most DIC, thrombosis and bleeding coexist. Second, DIC is a dynamic process. Third, endothelial cell injury and systemic coagulation activation are the core of DIC. Fourth, DIC is an initiating factor of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). There are still controversies about the diagnostic criteria of DIC. First, it relies on clinical manifestations and laboratory tests, which cannot reflect pathophysiology. Second, the clinical manifestations were not sensitive or specific. Third, there is a lack of sensitive biomarkers. Fourth, the parameters in the current diagnostic criteria cannot fully reflect the actual coagulation function. Fifth, it is obviously inappropriate to use the same scoring system for diagnosis of clinical syndromes with different etiologies and pathophysiology. Therefore, it is urgent to re-establish the diagnostic criteria for DIC. In recent years, the understanding of DIC has been continuously improved, including the in-depth understanding of the pathogenesis, the classification of coagulation phenotypes, and the development of the "two-step" diagnosis of DIC, etc. All of these contribute to the establishment of new diagnostic criteria for DIC. In conclusion, it is necessary to develop personalized diagnostic criteria based on etiology, reflecting pathophysiological mechanisms, establishing clear cut-off values for parameters, being clinical applicable, being globally unified, and most importantly, being able to identify therapeutic targets.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate
- the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions
- the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines
- the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities
- access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide
- addressing the grand health challenges around the world