Ultrasound-On-Chip With Semiconductor Silicon Chip Array for Transcutaneous Salivary Gland Injections: A Pilot Cadaver Study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
David Y. Goldrich, Shivam Patel, Bao Y. Sciscent, Hanel W. Eberly, Neerav Goyal
{"title":"Ultrasound-On-Chip With Semiconductor Silicon Chip Array for Transcutaneous Salivary Gland Injections: A Pilot Cadaver Study","authors":"David Y. Goldrich,&nbsp;Shivam Patel,&nbsp;Bao Y. Sciscent,&nbsp;Hanel W. Eberly,&nbsp;Neerav Goyal","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Ultrasound (US) is a well-established imaging modality for the evaluation of head and neck anatomy. The Butterfly iQ is a handheld ultrasound device that uses a semiconductor silicon chip array (capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducers, CMUT) instead of piezoelectric crystals used by traditional ultrasounds (TUS), but its accuracy has not been investigated with respect to salivary gland imaging and associated transcutaneous procedures. We aimed to perform a pilot cadaver study to determine the utility and fidelity of the CMUT-US for parotid and submandibular gland imaging and guiding transcutaneous gland injection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>One otolaryngologist injected 0.5 mL of dye into three distinct salivary gland sites (two intraparotid sites and one submandibular gland site) bilaterally on 20 cadavers (<i>n</i> = 120 glands), using either CMUT-US or TUS to guide injection. The cadavers were dissected to identify whether the dye was accurately injected into each site.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The accuracies of CMUT-US and TUS-guided injections in the parotid gland were 95.0% (<i>n</i> = 40) and 90.0% (<i>n</i> = 40), respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.69). In the submandibular gland, the accuracies for the CMUT-US (<i>n</i> = 20) and TUS (<i>n</i> = 20) were both 75.0% (<i>p</i> = 0.72). Across all salivary gland sites, injection accuracy was 88.3% (<i>n</i> = 60) using TUS versus 85.0% (<i>n</i> = 60) using CMUT-US (<i>p</i> = 0.79). No significant differences between modalities were seen in the accuracy of injection based on injection subsite, laterality, cadaver sex, or age.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This pilot study demonstrates that CMUT-US-guided salivary gland injection offers similar high accuracy and reproducibility to TUS-guided injection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>V.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70102","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Ultrasound (US) is a well-established imaging modality for the evaluation of head and neck anatomy. The Butterfly iQ is a handheld ultrasound device that uses a semiconductor silicon chip array (capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducers, CMUT) instead of piezoelectric crystals used by traditional ultrasounds (TUS), but its accuracy has not been investigated with respect to salivary gland imaging and associated transcutaneous procedures. We aimed to perform a pilot cadaver study to determine the utility and fidelity of the CMUT-US for parotid and submandibular gland imaging and guiding transcutaneous gland injection.

Methods

One otolaryngologist injected 0.5 mL of dye into three distinct salivary gland sites (two intraparotid sites and one submandibular gland site) bilaterally on 20 cadavers (n = 120 glands), using either CMUT-US or TUS to guide injection. The cadavers were dissected to identify whether the dye was accurately injected into each site.

Results

The accuracies of CMUT-US and TUS-guided injections in the parotid gland were 95.0% (n = 40) and 90.0% (n = 40), respectively (p = 0.69). In the submandibular gland, the accuracies for the CMUT-US (n = 20) and TUS (n = 20) were both 75.0% (p = 0.72). Across all salivary gland sites, injection accuracy was 88.3% (n = 60) using TUS versus 85.0% (n = 60) using CMUT-US (p = 0.79). No significant differences between modalities were seen in the accuracy of injection based on injection subsite, laterality, cadaver sex, or age.

Conclusion

This pilot study demonstrates that CMUT-US-guided salivary gland injection offers similar high accuracy and reproducibility to TUS-guided injection.

Level of Evidence

V.

Abstract Image

利用半导体硅片阵列进行经皮唾液腺注射的超声波芯片:一项试点尸体研究
目的超声(US)是一种完善的头颈部解剖评估成像方式。Butterfly iQ是一种手持式超声设备,使用半导体硅芯片阵列(电容式微机械超声换能器,CMUT)代替传统超声波(TUS)使用的压电晶体,但其在唾液腺成像和相关经皮手术方面的准确性尚未得到研究。我们的目的是进行一项试点尸体研究,以确定cmutus在腮腺和下颌骨腺成像和引导经皮腺体注射方面的实用性和保真度。方法1名耳鼻喉科医师在20具尸体(n = 120个腺体)的3个不同的唾液腺部位(2个腮腺内和1个颌下腺)双侧注射0.5 mL染料,采用cmu - us或TUS引导注射。解剖尸体以确定染料是否被准确地注射到每个部位。结果cmu - us和tus引导下腮腺注射的准确率分别为95.0% (n = 40)和90.0% (n = 40) (p = 0.69)。在颌下腺中,cmu - us (n = 20)和TUS (n = 20)的准确率均为75.0% (p = 0.72)。在所有唾液腺部位,使用TUS的注射准确率为88.3% (n = 60),而使用CMUT-US的注射准确率为85.0% (n = 60) (p = 0.79)。不同的注射方式在注射部位、侧边、尸体性别或年龄的注射准确性上没有显著差异。结论cmu - us引导下的唾液腺注射与tus引导下的唾液腺注射具有相似的高准确性和重复性。证据水平
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信