Clinical Assessment of Common Medications for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rui Shi, Keyan Chai, Haojia Wang, Jiying Zhou, Siyun Yang, Jiaqi Li, Chuanqi Qiao, Xiaoguang Sheng, Xiaomeng Zhang, Jiarui Wu
{"title":"Clinical Assessment of Common Medications for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis","authors":"Rui Shi,&nbsp;Keyan Chai,&nbsp;Haojia Wang,&nbsp;Jiying Zhou,&nbsp;Siyun Yang,&nbsp;Jiaqi Li,&nbsp;Chuanqi Qiao,&nbsp;Xiaoguang Sheng,&nbsp;Xiaomeng Zhang,&nbsp;Jiarui Wu","doi":"10.1111/jebm.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>With a steadily rising prevalence, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was a leading global cause of liver-related health problems. In the clinical management of NAFLD, various western pharmaceuticals were widely utilized. This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of common western medications for NAFLD patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We systematically reviewed and screened articles based on predesigned criterion about western medications for NAFLD, which were from Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CNKI, WanFang, and China Science and Technology Journal Database until August 1, 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials of patients aged 18 or older with NAFLD, comparing Western medicines to placebos or other Western medicine treatments. The risk of bias assessment tool 2.0 from the Cochrane system was used to assess the quality of the included articles. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using WinBUGS 1.4.3 with a random-effects model and Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. Treatment rankings were based on Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) values, and heterogeneity was assessed with <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> and <i>Q</i> statistics. The outcomes were analyzed in WinBUGS and visualized using Stata 14.0, generating network plots and cumulative probability rankings to compare treatment effects. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024509176).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Based on 37 included articles involving 7673 patients, pioglitazone demonstrated the most significant effects in resolving nonalcoholic steatohepatitis without worsening fibrosis, increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and achieving a ≥ 2-point reduction in NAFLD activity scores (odds ratio [OR] = 0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01 to 0.81), with a SUCRA probability of 91.4%. Aldafermin showed remarkable effects in improving liver function markers, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, with cumulative probabilities of 90% for ALT and 69.8% for AST. Cluster analysis revealed that Resmetirom and Aldafermin were superior options for enhancing liver function, while pioglitazone emerged as the best treatment for the comprehensive improvement of NAFLD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Pioglitazone outperformed other western medicines in terms of overall efficacy when treating NAFLD, but Aldafermin and Resmetirom showed superior improvement in liver function. This study provided a certain level of support for the use of specific clinical medications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jebm.70002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jebm.70002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

With a steadily rising prevalence, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was a leading global cause of liver-related health problems. In the clinical management of NAFLD, various western pharmaceuticals were widely utilized. This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of common western medications for NAFLD patients.

Methods

We systematically reviewed and screened articles based on predesigned criterion about western medications for NAFLD, which were from Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CNKI, WanFang, and China Science and Technology Journal Database until August 1, 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials of patients aged 18 or older with NAFLD, comparing Western medicines to placebos or other Western medicine treatments. The risk of bias assessment tool 2.0 from the Cochrane system was used to assess the quality of the included articles. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using WinBUGS 1.4.3 with a random-effects model and Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. Treatment rankings were based on Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) values, and heterogeneity was assessed with I2 and Q statistics. The outcomes were analyzed in WinBUGS and visualized using Stata 14.0, generating network plots and cumulative probability rankings to compare treatment effects. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024509176).

Results

Based on 37 included articles involving 7673 patients, pioglitazone demonstrated the most significant effects in resolving nonalcoholic steatohepatitis without worsening fibrosis, increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and achieving a ≥ 2-point reduction in NAFLD activity scores (odds ratio [OR] = 0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01 to 0.81), with a SUCRA probability of 91.4%. Aldafermin showed remarkable effects in improving liver function markers, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, with cumulative probabilities of 90% for ALT and 69.8% for AST. Cluster analysis revealed that Resmetirom and Aldafermin were superior options for enhancing liver function, while pioglitazone emerged as the best treatment for the comprehensive improvement of NAFLD.

Conclusions

Pioglitazone outperformed other western medicines in terms of overall efficacy when treating NAFLD, but Aldafermin and Resmetirom showed superior improvement in liver function. This study provided a certain level of support for the use of specific clinical medications.

Abstract Image

非酒精性脂肪性肝病常用药物的临床评价:系统评价和贝叶斯网络meta分析
随着患病率的稳步上升,非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)是全球肝脏相关健康问题的主要原因。在NAFLD的临床治疗中,各种西药被广泛应用。本网络荟萃分析旨在评估常用西药治疗NAFLD患者的有效性。方法系统筛选Embase、Cochrane Library、PubMed、CNKI、万方、中国科技期刊数据库截止到2024年8月1日的NAFLD西药相关文献,并按照预先设计的标准对相关文献进行梳理和筛选。符合条件的研究包括18岁及以上NAFLD患者的随机对照试验,将西药与安慰剂或其他西药治疗进行比较。使用Cochrane系统的偏倚风险评估工具2.0来评估纳入文章的质量。采用WinBUGS 1.4.3软件,采用随机效应模型和马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法进行贝叶斯网络元分析。根据累积排名曲线(SUCRA)值对处理进行排名,并采用I2和Q统计量评估异质性。结果在WinBUGS中进行分析,并使用Stata 14.0进行可视化,生成网络图和累积概率排名来比较治疗效果。该系统评价已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024509176)。结果基于37篇纳入的文章,涉及7673例患者,吡格列酮在解决非酒精性脂肪性肝炎方面表现出最显著的效果,没有恶化纤维化,增加高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平,并实现NAFLD活性评分降低≥2点(优势比[OR] = 0.09, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.01至0.81),SUCRA概率为91.4%。alafermin对谷丙转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)和γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(γ-谷氨酰转肽酶)的改善效果显著,ALT的累积概率为90%,AST的累积概率为69.8%。聚类分析显示,瑞司替龙和alafermin是改善肝功能的较佳选择。而吡格列酮是NAFLD综合改善的最佳治疗方案。结论吡格列酮治疗NAFLD的综合疗效优于其他西药,而阿尔非明和雷司替龙对肝功能的改善效果优于其他西药。本研究为临床特定药物的使用提供了一定程度的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (EMB) is an esteemed international healthcare and medical decision-making journal, dedicated to publishing groundbreaking research outcomes in evidence-based decision-making, research, practice, and education. Serving as the official English-language journal of the Cochrane China Centre and West China Hospital of Sichuan University, we eagerly welcome editorials, commentaries, and systematic reviews encompassing various topics such as clinical trials, policy, drug and patient safety, education, and knowledge translation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信