A Conceptual Framework for Measuring Ecological Novelty

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Timothy L. Staples, Jessica Blois, Katie L. Cramer, Emer T. Cunningham, Maria Dornelas, Simon G. Haberle, Tina Heger, Wolfgang Kiessling, Anne E. Magurran, Aaron O'Dea, Amelia M. Penny, Volker C. Radeloff, Jansen A. Smith, Wilfried Thuiller, John W. Williams, John M. Pandolfi
{"title":"A Conceptual Framework for Measuring Ecological Novelty","authors":"Timothy L. Staples,&nbsp;Jessica Blois,&nbsp;Katie L. Cramer,&nbsp;Emer T. Cunningham,&nbsp;Maria Dornelas,&nbsp;Simon G. Haberle,&nbsp;Tina Heger,&nbsp;Wolfgang Kiessling,&nbsp;Anne E. Magurran,&nbsp;Aaron O'Dea,&nbsp;Amelia M. Penny,&nbsp;Volker C. Radeloff,&nbsp;Jansen A. Smith,&nbsp;Wilfried Thuiller,&nbsp;John W. Williams,&nbsp;John M. Pandolfi","doi":"10.1111/geb.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Human pressures are driving the emergence of unprecedented, ‘novel’, ecological and environmental systems. The concept of novel (eco)systems is well accepted by the scientific community, but the use and measurement of novelty has outgrown initial definitions and critiques. There are still unresolved methodological and conceptual differences in quantifying novelty that prevent a unified research approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Framework</h3>\n \n <p>Here we present a conceptual framework and guidelines to unify past and future measurement of ecological novelty. Under this framework, novelty is a property of an ecological or environmental entity of interest. Novelty is quantified as the comparison between the target entity and a reference set, measured as the summary of degrees of difference across one or more dimensions. Choices in these components, particularly the reference set, can change resulting novelty measurements and inferences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Showcase</h3>\n \n <p>We provide a case-study to showcase our framework, measuring pre- and post-European novelty in 99 pollen assemblages in Midwest USA forests. We paired this quantitative exploration with a five-step process designed to improve the utility and outcomes of novelty analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Quantitative novelty has immense value in studies of abrupt ecological change, linking climatic and ecological change, biotic interactions and invasions, species range shifts and fundamental theories. Our framework offers a unified overview and is also primed for integration into management and restoration workflows, providing consistent and robust measurements of novelty to support decision making, priority setting and resource allocation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Human pressures are driving the emergence of unprecedented, ‘novel’, ecological and environmental systems. The concept of novel (eco)systems is well accepted by the scientific community, but the use and measurement of novelty has outgrown initial definitions and critiques. There are still unresolved methodological and conceptual differences in quantifying novelty that prevent a unified research approach.

Framework

Here we present a conceptual framework and guidelines to unify past and future measurement of ecological novelty. Under this framework, novelty is a property of an ecological or environmental entity of interest. Novelty is quantified as the comparison between the target entity and a reference set, measured as the summary of degrees of difference across one or more dimensions. Choices in these components, particularly the reference set, can change resulting novelty measurements and inferences.

Showcase

We provide a case-study to showcase our framework, measuring pre- and post-European novelty in 99 pollen assemblages in Midwest USA forests. We paired this quantitative exploration with a five-step process designed to improve the utility and outcomes of novelty analyses.

Conclusions

Quantitative novelty has immense value in studies of abrupt ecological change, linking climatic and ecological change, biotic interactions and invasions, species range shifts and fundamental theories. Our framework offers a unified overview and is also primed for integration into management and restoration workflows, providing consistent and robust measurements of novelty to support decision making, priority setting and resource allocation.

Abstract Image

生态新颖性测量的概念框架
人类的压力正在推动前所未有的“新颖”生态和环境系统的出现。新颖性(生态)系统的概念已被科学界广泛接受,但新颖性的使用和测量已经超出了最初的定义和批评。在量化新颖性方面仍然存在未解决的方法和概念差异,这阻碍了统一的研究方法。在这里,我们提出了一个概念框架和指导方针,以统一过去和未来的生态新颖性测量。在这个框架下,新颖性是生态或环境实体的一种属性。新颖性被量化为目标实体和参考集之间的比较,作为跨一个或多个维度的差异程度的总结来衡量。在这些组件中的选择,特别是参考集,可以改变产生的新颖性测量和推断。我们提供了一个案例研究来展示我们的框架,在美国中西部森林的99种花粉组合中测量欧洲前和欧洲后的新颖性。我们将这种定量探索与五步过程配对,旨在提高新颖性分析的效用和结果。结论定量新颖性在研究生态突变、联系气候与生态变化、生物相互作用与入侵、物种范围转移和基础理论等方面具有重要价值。我们的框架提供了一个统一的概述,也为整合到管理和恢复工作流程做好了准备,为支持决策制定、优先设置和资源分配提供了一致和可靠的新颖性测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信