Influence of borate chemical treatment on adhesive bond performance of Douglas fir and grand fir laminates

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
A. T. Adeniran, K. Englund, H. Li, J-W Kim
{"title":"Influence of borate chemical treatment on adhesive bond performance of Douglas fir and grand fir laminates","authors":"A. T. Adeniran,&nbsp;K. Englund,&nbsp;H. Li,&nbsp;J-W Kim","doi":"10.1007/s00107-025-02218-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates borate treatments of Douglas fir (<i>Pseudotsuga menziesii</i>) and grand fir (<i>Abies grandis</i>) lamstock and their impact on adhesive bonding performance. Lamstock were treated using three different methods (dip, double vacuum, and vacuum/pressure) with the aim to achieve a target retention of 0.1% (w/w) B₂O₃. The degree to which B₂O₃ was sorbed by the lamstocks was evaluated using image analysis technique. Treated lamstocks were bonded with one component polyurethane adhesive, and bond performance was evaluated by a cyclic delamination and block shear test. Results revealed that the uptake of treating solution differs by treatment methods and species. Uptake by vacuum/pressure-treated lamstocks is highest while uptake in dip treated lamstocks is the lowest. Grand fir had higher uptake values than Douglas fir throughout all treatments. The level of retention of B₂O₃ was influenced by treating solution concentration and wood properties. Dip treated lamstock showed limited spread of retained B₂O₃ with bulk of the B₂O₃ retained close to the surface. All conditions of grand fir, planed or unplaned, were able to meet the requirement of ANSI A190.1-2022 for block shear wood failure and total delamination, while unplaned specimens of Douglas-fir did not meet the requirement of ANSI A190.1-2022. Borate treatments increased the hydrophilicity of the lamstocks, causing the potential formation of superficial bonds between the adhesive and the accumulated chemicals on the surface of the unplaned dip treated lamina. This study presents insightful information about maximizing the chemical treatment of B₂O₃ to have the least possible impact on adhesive bond performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":550,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products","volume":"83 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00107-025-02218-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates borate treatments of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and grand fir (Abies grandis) lamstock and their impact on adhesive bonding performance. Lamstock were treated using three different methods (dip, double vacuum, and vacuum/pressure) with the aim to achieve a target retention of 0.1% (w/w) B₂O₃. The degree to which B₂O₃ was sorbed by the lamstocks was evaluated using image analysis technique. Treated lamstocks were bonded with one component polyurethane adhesive, and bond performance was evaluated by a cyclic delamination and block shear test. Results revealed that the uptake of treating solution differs by treatment methods and species. Uptake by vacuum/pressure-treated lamstocks is highest while uptake in dip treated lamstocks is the lowest. Grand fir had higher uptake values than Douglas fir throughout all treatments. The level of retention of B₂O₃ was influenced by treating solution concentration and wood properties. Dip treated lamstock showed limited spread of retained B₂O₃ with bulk of the B₂O₃ retained close to the surface. All conditions of grand fir, planed or unplaned, were able to meet the requirement of ANSI A190.1-2022 for block shear wood failure and total delamination, while unplaned specimens of Douglas-fir did not meet the requirement of ANSI A190.1-2022. Borate treatments increased the hydrophilicity of the lamstocks, causing the potential formation of superficial bonds between the adhesive and the accumulated chemicals on the surface of the unplaned dip treated lamina. This study presents insightful information about maximizing the chemical treatment of B₂O₃ to have the least possible impact on adhesive bond performance.

Abstract Image

硼酸盐化学处理对花旗松和杉木层压板粘结性能的影响
研究了硼酸盐处理对花旗松(Pseudotsuga menziesii)和冷杉(Abies grandis)主材粘接性能的影响。用三种不同的方法(浸渍法、双真空法和真空/压力法)处理Lamstock,目的是达到0.1% (w/w)的B₂O₃的目标保留率。利用影像分析技术评价了B₂O₃被灯管吸收的程度。用单组分聚氨酯胶粘剂粘接处理后的板材,通过循环分层和块剪试验评价粘接性能。结果表明,不同的处理方法和不同的物种对处理液的吸收量不同。真空/压力处理板的吸收率最高,而浸渍处理板的吸收率最低。在所有处理中,杉木的吸收值均高于花旗松。B₂O₃的滞留率受处理液浓度和木材性质的影响。浸渍处理的油料显示出保留的B₂O₃的扩散有限,大部分B₂O₃保留在靠近表面的地方。大杉木经过刨削和未刨削的各工况均能满足ANSI A190.1-2022对木块剪切破坏和总分层的要求,而道格拉斯杉木未经刨削的试件不符合ANSI A190.1-2022的要求。硼酸盐处理增加了层压板的亲水性,导致粘合剂与未刨面浸渍处理的层压板表面积累的化学物质之间形成潜在的表面键。这项研究提供了关于最大化B₂O₃的化学处理以对粘合剂粘合性能产生最小影响的有见地的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Wood and Wood Products reports on original research and new developments in the field of wood and wood products and their biological, chemical, physical as well as mechanical and technological properties, processes and uses. Subjects range from roundwood to wood based products, composite materials and structural applications, with related jointing techniques. Moreover, it deals with wood as a chemical raw material, source of energy as well as with inter-disciplinary aspects of environmental assessment and international markets. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products aims at promoting international scientific communication and transfer of new technologies from research into practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信