Energy flexibility and management software in building clusters: A comprehensive review

Behnam Mohseni-Gharyehsafa , Adamantios Bampoulas , Donal Finn , Fabiano Pallonetto
{"title":"Energy flexibility and management software in building clusters: A comprehensive review","authors":"Behnam Mohseni-Gharyehsafa ,&nbsp;Adamantios Bampoulas ,&nbsp;Donal Finn ,&nbsp;Fabiano Pallonetto","doi":"10.1016/j.nxener.2025.100250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electrification of energy use in buildings is a promising strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and facilitating the transition to a carbon-neutral society. Increasing the electrification of building energy demand creates opportunities to leverage energy flexibility for optimizing energy consumption within buildings. However, existing research on energy flexibility in buildings lacks a comprehensive evaluation of software solutions capable of effectively harnessing this potential. This study addresses this gap by conducting a detailed review of 203 commercial and 40 free open-source software tools designed for energy management in buildings and districts. These tools were evaluated based on their ability to manage key aspects of energy flexibility, including demand response, integration with renewable energy systems, scalability, and real-time control. Our analysis reveals that only 20% of commercial software supports robust energy flexibility, compared to 73% of free open-source tools. To guide future software development, this study proposes the following recommendations: (1) enhance scalability to enable deployment in large-scale community buildings, (2) incorporate benchmarking metrics to offer a Pareto front of optimal end-use solutions, (3) include key performance indicators (KPIs), (4) integrate fault detection, tolerance, and diagnostic methods, (5) implement cloud, fog, and edge computing services to improve reliability and operability, (6) ensure greater flexibility in communication, interoperability, and seamless data exchange, and (7) adopt Internet of Things (IoT) and blockchain technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100957,"journal":{"name":"Next Energy","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Next Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949821X25000134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electrification of energy use in buildings is a promising strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and facilitating the transition to a carbon-neutral society. Increasing the electrification of building energy demand creates opportunities to leverage energy flexibility for optimizing energy consumption within buildings. However, existing research on energy flexibility in buildings lacks a comprehensive evaluation of software solutions capable of effectively harnessing this potential. This study addresses this gap by conducting a detailed review of 203 commercial and 40 free open-source software tools designed for energy management in buildings and districts. These tools were evaluated based on their ability to manage key aspects of energy flexibility, including demand response, integration with renewable energy systems, scalability, and real-time control. Our analysis reveals that only 20% of commercial software supports robust energy flexibility, compared to 73% of free open-source tools. To guide future software development, this study proposes the following recommendations: (1) enhance scalability to enable deployment in large-scale community buildings, (2) incorporate benchmarking metrics to offer a Pareto front of optimal end-use solutions, (3) include key performance indicators (KPIs), (4) integrate fault detection, tolerance, and diagnostic methods, (5) implement cloud, fog, and edge computing services to improve reliability and operability, (6) ensure greater flexibility in communication, interoperability, and seamless data exchange, and (7) adopt Internet of Things (IoT) and blockchain technologies.

Abstract Image

建筑集群的能源灵活性和管理软件:综合评价
建筑物能源使用电气化是减少温室气体排放和促进向碳中和社会过渡的一项有前途的战略。增加建筑能源需求的电气化为利用能源灵活性优化建筑内的能源消耗创造了机会。然而,现有的关于建筑能源灵活性的研究缺乏对能够有效利用这一潜力的软件解决方案的全面评估。本研究通过对203个商业和40个免费开源软件工具进行详细审查,解决了这一差距,这些软件工具专为建筑物和地区的能源管理而设计。这些工具是根据其管理能源灵活性关键方面的能力进行评估的,包括需求响应、与可再生能源系统的集成、可扩展性和实时控制。我们的分析显示,只有20%的商业软件支持强大的能源灵活性,而73%的免费开源工具支持。为了指导未来的软件开发,本研究提出以下建议:(1)增强可扩展性,使其能够在大型社区建筑中部署;(2)纳入基准指标,以提供最优最终用户解决方案的帕累托前沿;(3)包括关键绩效指标(kpi);(4)集成故障检测、容错和诊断方法;(5)实施云、雾和边缘计算服务,以提高可靠性和可操作性;(6)确保通信、互操作性和无缝数据交换方面的更大灵活性。(7)采用物联网(IoT)和区块链技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信