Mechanism that links perceived racism and discrimination and youth cannabis use, a structural equation modeling approach

IF 2.8 Q1 Psychology

Addictive Behaviors Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100590

Hongying Daisy Dai , Brian Young , Cheryl Beseler

{"title":"Mechanism that links perceived racism and discrimination and youth cannabis use, a structural equation modeling approach","authors":"Hongying Daisy Dai , Brian Young , Cheryl Beseler","doi":"10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objectives</h3><div>Exposure to discrimination stands as a prevalent social stressor and social determinant of health. This study sought to examine mechanisms linking perceived racism and discrimination (PRD) with youth cannabis use.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were drawn from the 2021 Adolescent Behaviors and Experiences Survey (n = 7,705). Latent variables were constructed to assess stress and mental health, sleep disorder and lack of physical activity, lack of family and peer support, and financial adversity. Separate mediation analyses were conducted to examine the pathways from PRD to current (past 30-day), and frequent (≥20 days in the past 30-day) cannabis use, adjusted by sociodemographic factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Adolescents with PRD (vs. no PRD) reported a higher prevalence of current use (16.2 % vs. 10.9 %, p < 0.0001) and frequent use (4.6 % vs. 2.7 %, p = 0.008). Stress and mental health mediated the pathways from PRD to current (β<sub>indirect effect</sub> [SE] = 0.02 [0.01], p = 0.02) and frequent cannabis use (β<sub>indirect effect</sub> [SE] = 0.03 [0.01], p < 0.001). Financial adversity was associated with current (β [SE] = 0.15 [0.06], p = 0.01) and frequent cannabis use (β [SE] = 0.26 [0.08], p = 0.002). Sleep disorder and physical activity did not significantly mediate the relationship between PRD and current or frequent cannabis use. Lack of family and peer support showed no association with cannabis use.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This national study identified important latent factors that are associated with youth cannabis use. Targeted interventions that reduce stress might mitigate the impacts of PRD on adolescent’s cannabis use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38040,"journal":{"name":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100590"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853225000082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Exposure to discrimination stands as a prevalent social stressor and social determinant of health. This study sought to examine mechanisms linking perceived racism and discrimination (PRD) with youth cannabis use.

Methods

Data were drawn from the 2021 Adolescent Behaviors and Experiences Survey (n = 7,705). Latent variables were constructed to assess stress and mental health, sleep disorder and lack of physical activity, lack of family and peer support, and financial adversity. Separate mediation analyses were conducted to examine the pathways from PRD to current (past 30-day), and frequent (≥20 days in the past 30-day) cannabis use, adjusted by sociodemographic factors.

Results

Adolescents with PRD (vs. no PRD) reported a higher prevalence of current use (16.2 % vs. 10.9 %, p < 0.0001) and frequent use (4.6 % vs. 2.7 %, p = 0.008). Stress and mental health mediated the pathways from PRD to current (β_{indirect effect} [SE] = 0.02 [0.01], p = 0.02) and frequent cannabis use (β_{indirect effect} [SE] = 0.03 [0.01], p < 0.001). Financial adversity was associated with current (β [SE] = 0.15 [0.06], p = 0.01) and frequent cannabis use (β [SE] = 0.26 [0.08], p = 0.002). Sleep disorder and physical activity did not significantly mediate the relationship between PRD and current or frequent cannabis use. Lack of family and peer support showed no association with cannabis use.

Conclusions

This national study identified important latent factors that are associated with youth cannabis use. Targeted interventions that reduce stress might mitigate the impacts of PRD on adolescent’s cannabis use.

查看原文本刊更多论文

将感知到的种族主义和歧视与青少年大麻使用联系起来的机制，一种结构方程建模方法

背景和目的暴露于歧视是一个普遍的社会压力源和健康的社会决定因素。本研究旨在探讨将种族主义和歧视（PRD）与青少年大麻使用联系起来的机制。方法数据来源于《2021年青少年行为与经历调查》（n = 7705）。构建潜在变量来评估压力和心理健康、睡眠障碍和缺乏体育活动、缺乏家庭和同伴支持以及经济困难。进行了单独的中介分析，以检查PRD到当前（过去30天）和频繁（过去30天≥20天）大麻使用的途径，并根据社会人口因素进行调整。结果有PRD的青少年（与没有PRD的青少年相比）报告了更高的使用率(16.2%比10.9%,p <；0.0001)和频繁使用(4.6%比2.7%,p = 0.008)。应激和心理健康介导了PRD到电流的通路（β间接效应[SE] = 0.02 [0.01], p = 0.02）和频繁使用大麻(β间接效应[SE] = 0.03 [0.01], p <；0.001)。财务逆境与吸食大麻（β [SE] = 0.15 [0.06], p = 0.01）和频繁吸食大麻（β [SE] = 0.26 [0.08], p = 0.002）相关。睡眠障碍和身体活动并没有显著调节PRD与当前或频繁使用大麻之间的关系。缺乏家庭和同伴支持与大麻使用没有关联。结论：这项全国性研究确定了与青少年大麻使用相关的重要潜在因素。减轻压力的有针对性的干预措施可能减轻PRD对青少年大麻使用的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Addictive Behaviors Reports Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health

CiteScore

6.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

71 days

期刊介绍： Addictive Behaviors Reports is an open-access and peer reviewed online-only journal offering an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research in addictive behaviors. The journal accepts submissions that are scientifically sound on all forms of addictive behavior (alcohol, drugs, gambling, Internet, nicotine and technology) with a primary focus on behavioral and psychosocial research. The emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. We are particularly interested in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research. Studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry as well as scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are also very much encouraged. We also welcome multimedia submissions that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.