Brandon T. Ritchison , C. Zoe Doubles , Maureen S. Meyers
{"title":"Mind the gap: Modeling Mississippian migration and frontier settlement in southwest Virginia, USA","authors":"Brandon T. Ritchison , C. Zoe Doubles , Maureen S. Meyers","doi":"10.1016/j.jaa.2025.101664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Archaeological narratives of migrations in pre-Colonial North America rely on cultural materials, which often only convey relative temporalities and tempos of these dynamic events. Here, we employ Bayesian chronological modeling to examine a pattern of immigration into a cultural frontier during the 14<sup>th</sup> through the 16<sup>th</sup> centuries AD in what is today southwest Virginia, USA. Incorporation of prior archaeological knowledge and a compilation of new and old radiocarbon dates reverses the chronological relationship of two Mississippian cultural sites that would have been expected based on the presently accepted regional ceramic chronology. This reversal necessitates a recontextualization of migrant motivations and experiences. Additionally, our new chronology demonstrates that when examined at finer spatial and temporal scales, regional population movements in the Mississippian (ca. 10<sup>th</sup> – 17<sup>th</sup> centuries AD) period were likely bi-directional and contingent upon historical circumstance as much as macro-regional push and pull factors. Our revised chronology for these two Mississippian cultural sites offers new avenues for investigating and understanding migrant experiences in the past.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 101664"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278416525000091","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Archaeological narratives of migrations in pre-Colonial North America rely on cultural materials, which often only convey relative temporalities and tempos of these dynamic events. Here, we employ Bayesian chronological modeling to examine a pattern of immigration into a cultural frontier during the 14th through the 16th centuries AD in what is today southwest Virginia, USA. Incorporation of prior archaeological knowledge and a compilation of new and old radiocarbon dates reverses the chronological relationship of two Mississippian cultural sites that would have been expected based on the presently accepted regional ceramic chronology. This reversal necessitates a recontextualization of migrant motivations and experiences. Additionally, our new chronology demonstrates that when examined at finer spatial and temporal scales, regional population movements in the Mississippian (ca. 10th – 17th centuries AD) period were likely bi-directional and contingent upon historical circumstance as much as macro-regional push and pull factors. Our revised chronology for these two Mississippian cultural sites offers new avenues for investigating and understanding migrant experiences in the past.
期刊介绍:
An innovative, international publication, the Journal of Anthropological Archaeology is devoted to the development of theory and, in a broad sense, methodology for the systematic and rigorous understanding of the organization, operation, and evolution of human societies. The discipline served by the journal is characterized by its goals and approach, not by geographical or temporal bounds. The data utilized or treated range from the earliest archaeological evidence for the emergence of human culture to historically documented societies and the contemporary observations of the ethnographer, ethnoarchaeologist, sociologist, or geographer. These subjects appear in the journal as examples of cultural organization, operation, and evolution, not as specific historical phenomena.