From self-interest to group interest: Machiavellianism fuels intergroup bias depending on ingroup identification

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Zhen Liu , Li Liu , Jianning Dang , Cong Wei , Chao Li , Xiaoyan Miao , Xinying Jiang
{"title":"From self-interest to group interest: Machiavellianism fuels intergroup bias depending on ingroup identification","authors":"Zhen Liu ,&nbsp;Li Liu ,&nbsp;Jianning Dang ,&nbsp;Cong Wei ,&nbsp;Chao Li ,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Miao ,&nbsp;Xinying Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The fact that Machiavellianism entails a preference for oneself over others has been well documented. However, whether this self-centeredness extends to a tendency to favor one's ingroup over outgroups remains unanswered. By integrating social identity theory with the Machiavellianism literature, we propose and test the hypothesis that Machiavellianism leads individuals to favor their ingroup over outgroups (a phenomenon known as intergroup bias) among individuals who identify strongly with their ingroups. Study 1 (<em>N</em> <sub>country =</sub> 43), which relied on data drawn from the World Values Survey and the Open Psychometrics Project, provided both national-level and cross-level evidence supporting our hypothesis. Study 2, which surveyed 400 Chinese university students, supported the hypothesis at the individual level in inter-university contexts. Study 3, which involved a preregistered survey of 374 Americans, confirmed our findings in both interracial and interparty contexts. Study 3 also revealed that among high (vs. low) identifiers, Machiavellianism positively predicted intergroup bias by reducing negativity toward the ingroup. Our findings extend Machiavellianism research by linking it to intergroup bias, offering theoretical and practical implications from an intergroup perspective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 113107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000698","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fact that Machiavellianism entails a preference for oneself over others has been well documented. However, whether this self-centeredness extends to a tendency to favor one's ingroup over outgroups remains unanswered. By integrating social identity theory with the Machiavellianism literature, we propose and test the hypothesis that Machiavellianism leads individuals to favor their ingroup over outgroups (a phenomenon known as intergroup bias) among individuals who identify strongly with their ingroups. Study 1 (N country = 43), which relied on data drawn from the World Values Survey and the Open Psychometrics Project, provided both national-level and cross-level evidence supporting our hypothesis. Study 2, which surveyed 400 Chinese university students, supported the hypothesis at the individual level in inter-university contexts. Study 3, which involved a preregistered survey of 374 Americans, confirmed our findings in both interracial and interparty contexts. Study 3 also revealed that among high (vs. low) identifiers, Machiavellianism positively predicted intergroup bias by reducing negativity toward the ingroup. Our findings extend Machiavellianism research by linking it to intergroup bias, offering theoretical and practical implications from an intergroup perspective.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信