Understanding the effects of natural hazards on chemical emission incidents using machine learning techniques

IF 6.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Haoyu Yang , Chi-Yang Li , Lei Zou , Qingsheng Wang
{"title":"Understanding the effects of natural hazards on chemical emission incidents using machine learning techniques","authors":"Haoyu Yang ,&nbsp;Chi-Yang Li ,&nbsp;Lei Zou ,&nbsp;Qingsheng Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.106900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Natural hazard-triggered technological accidents (Natechs) pose significant risks to industrial safety, particularly in regions vulnerable to extreme weather conditions. This study explores the impact of various climate variables on the frequency of chemical emission incidents in Houston, TX, aiming to understand the major contributors of Natechs from a data-driven perspective and enhance predictive capabilities for process safety management. Machine learning models, including XGBoost, Random Forest, k-nearest neighbor (kNN), and support vector machine (SVM), were developed to predict high-risk days for chemical emission incidents, using local climate data as inputs. Conformal prediction techniques were employed to control error rates and optimize the balance between sensitivity and specificity. The results demonstrate that XGBoost and Random Forest models outperformed the others, achieving ROC AUC scores exceeding 0.8. Furthermore, the conformal wrapper indicated XGBoost as the more promising model, particularly under higher specificity requirements: at controlled specificity values of 0.75 and 0.80, its guaranteed sensitivity values were 0.765 and 0.750, compared to Random Forest’s 0.649 and 0.610, respectively. Notably, precipitation and lightning were identified as the most significant contributors to chemical emission incidents. Overall, this study provides a framework for using climate data in predictive models for Natechs with novel conformal error control strategies, offering valuable insights for proactive risk assessment and facilitating process safety protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 106900"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025001673","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural hazard-triggered technological accidents (Natechs) pose significant risks to industrial safety, particularly in regions vulnerable to extreme weather conditions. This study explores the impact of various climate variables on the frequency of chemical emission incidents in Houston, TX, aiming to understand the major contributors of Natechs from a data-driven perspective and enhance predictive capabilities for process safety management. Machine learning models, including XGBoost, Random Forest, k-nearest neighbor (kNN), and support vector machine (SVM), were developed to predict high-risk days for chemical emission incidents, using local climate data as inputs. Conformal prediction techniques were employed to control error rates and optimize the balance between sensitivity and specificity. The results demonstrate that XGBoost and Random Forest models outperformed the others, achieving ROC AUC scores exceeding 0.8. Furthermore, the conformal wrapper indicated XGBoost as the more promising model, particularly under higher specificity requirements: at controlled specificity values of 0.75 and 0.80, its guaranteed sensitivity values were 0.765 and 0.750, compared to Random Forest’s 0.649 and 0.610, respectively. Notably, precipitation and lightning were identified as the most significant contributors to chemical emission incidents. Overall, this study provides a framework for using climate data in predictive models for Natechs with novel conformal error control strategies, offering valuable insights for proactive risk assessment and facilitating process safety protocols.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信