Point-of-Care Ultrasound for the Detection of Vascular Access Site Complications—The ULTRASITCOM Study

Pietro Di Santo MD , Omar Abdel-Razek MD, MSc , Graeme Prosperi-Porta MD , Pouya Motazedian MD , Pascal Thériault-Lauzier MD , Saad Alhassani MD , Lee H. Sterling MDCM , Simon Parlow MD , Marie-Eve Mathieu MD , Richard G. Jung MD, PhD , Baylie Morgan BScN , Doug Coyle PhD , Dean A. Fergusson PhD , Kwadwo Kyeremanteng MD , Rebecca Mathew MD , Marino Labinaz MD , Michael Froeschl MD , Rebecca Hibbert MD , Trevor Simard MD, PhD , Jared G. Bird MD , Benjamin Hibbert MD, PhD
{"title":"Point-of-Care Ultrasound for the Detection of Vascular Access Site Complications—The ULTRASITCOM Study","authors":"Pietro Di Santo MD ,&nbsp;Omar Abdel-Razek MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Graeme Prosperi-Porta MD ,&nbsp;Pouya Motazedian MD ,&nbsp;Pascal Thériault-Lauzier MD ,&nbsp;Saad Alhassani MD ,&nbsp;Lee H. Sterling MDCM ,&nbsp;Simon Parlow MD ,&nbsp;Marie-Eve Mathieu MD ,&nbsp;Richard G. Jung MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Baylie Morgan BScN ,&nbsp;Doug Coyle PhD ,&nbsp;Dean A. Fergusson PhD ,&nbsp;Kwadwo Kyeremanteng MD ,&nbsp;Rebecca Mathew MD ,&nbsp;Marino Labinaz MD ,&nbsp;Michael Froeschl MD ,&nbsp;Rebecca Hibbert MD ,&nbsp;Trevor Simard MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jared G. Bird MD ,&nbsp;Benjamin Hibbert MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Recent technological advancements have expanded access to ultrasound technology. Invasive cardiac procedures come with risks of vascular access complications, necessitating efficient detection methods for dangerous complications such as pseudoaneurysms. Current clinical practice has relied on physical examination, and often requires formal diagnostic imaging to diagnose these complications. The ULTRAsound Assessment of Access SITe COMplications study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) as an adjunct to physical examination for the detection of pseudoaneurysms following invasive cardiac procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a single-center study that enrolled patients who underwent invasive cardiovascular procedures with suspected access site complications. Cardiology fellows were trained on the use of POCUS by a radiologist with expertise in vascular imaging. The primary outcome focused on the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of combined clinical and POCUS assessments compared to Doppler ultrasound or computed tomography.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 111 participants, most were female (59.5%), with a mean age of 72.2 years, and with transfemoral access being most prevalent (67.6%). A total of 15 participants were found to have a pseudoaneurysm on formal diagnostic imaging. The combined clinical and POCUS assessments were highly sensitive and demonstrated superior DOR for detecting pseudoaneurysms compared to the physical examination alone (DOR 42.6 [95% CI, 34.6-50.6] vs 15.6 [95% CI, 11.7-19.5]; <em>P</em> &lt; .01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Point-of-care ultrasound is a highly sensitive tool for detecting pseudoaneurysms following invasive cardiovascular procedures. These findings suggest the potential integration of POCUS into routine practice, which could result in timely complication identification and management, thereby improving patient outcomes and reducing health care costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 102516"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930324022051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Recent technological advancements have expanded access to ultrasound technology. Invasive cardiac procedures come with risks of vascular access complications, necessitating efficient detection methods for dangerous complications such as pseudoaneurysms. Current clinical practice has relied on physical examination, and often requires formal diagnostic imaging to diagnose these complications. The ULTRAsound Assessment of Access SITe COMplications study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) as an adjunct to physical examination for the detection of pseudoaneurysms following invasive cardiac procedures.

Methods

We conducted a single-center study that enrolled patients who underwent invasive cardiovascular procedures with suspected access site complications. Cardiology fellows were trained on the use of POCUS by a radiologist with expertise in vascular imaging. The primary outcome focused on the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of combined clinical and POCUS assessments compared to Doppler ultrasound or computed tomography.

Results

Among 111 participants, most were female (59.5%), with a mean age of 72.2 years, and with transfemoral access being most prevalent (67.6%). A total of 15 participants were found to have a pseudoaneurysm on formal diagnostic imaging. The combined clinical and POCUS assessments were highly sensitive and demonstrated superior DOR for detecting pseudoaneurysms compared to the physical examination alone (DOR 42.6 [95% CI, 34.6-50.6] vs 15.6 [95% CI, 11.7-19.5]; P < .01).

Conclusions

Point-of-care ultrasound is a highly sensitive tool for detecting pseudoaneurysms following invasive cardiovascular procedures. These findings suggest the potential integration of POCUS into routine practice, which could result in timely complication identification and management, thereby improving patient outcomes and reducing health care costs.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信