Which tariff to choose? How individual attitudes and preferences explain demand for flexible electricity tariffs in Germany

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Vincent Weidenbörner , Marvin Gleue , Christoph Feldhaus , Madeline Werthschulte
{"title":"Which tariff to choose? How individual attitudes and preferences explain demand for flexible electricity tariffs in Germany","authors":"Vincent Weidenbörner ,&nbsp;Marvin Gleue ,&nbsp;Christoph Feldhaus ,&nbsp;Madeline Werthschulte","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Time-variant pricing and voluntary flexibility in private energy consumption have the potential to enhance demand sensitivity in electricity markets, playing crucial roles in the transition towards a greener energy system. This paper uses survey methods to examine the determinants of the stated willingness to adopt time-variant electricity tariffs. Based on a large population sample (N = 1200) from the most populous German federal state, North Rhine-Westphalia, we differentiate between the general willingness to adopt such tariffs and specific types, including time-of-use (TOU), critical-peak-pricing (CPP), and real-time-pricing (RTP) tariffs. Additionally, participants provide information on their willingness to adjust their electricity consumption in a timely manner. Our findings reveal that the stated willingness to adopt time-variant tariffs decreases as the potential price volatility increases. Moreover, there is a strong positive correlation between the willingness to adopt time-variant tariffs and the willingness to provide energy demand flexibility. The results of our analysis further indicate that early adopters of energy-efficient technologies and supporters of climate policies are more inclined towards time-variant pricing and providing flexibility in their electricity consumption. Economic preferences, such as loss aversion and present bias, appear to be particularly relevant for adopting the RTP tariff. These insights offer valuable guidance for promoting time-variant tariffs and flexible energy consumption, facilitating the adoption of efficient and sustainable energy systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103978"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000593","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Time-variant pricing and voluntary flexibility in private energy consumption have the potential to enhance demand sensitivity in electricity markets, playing crucial roles in the transition towards a greener energy system. This paper uses survey methods to examine the determinants of the stated willingness to adopt time-variant electricity tariffs. Based on a large population sample (N = 1200) from the most populous German federal state, North Rhine-Westphalia, we differentiate between the general willingness to adopt such tariffs and specific types, including time-of-use (TOU), critical-peak-pricing (CPP), and real-time-pricing (RTP) tariffs. Additionally, participants provide information on their willingness to adjust their electricity consumption in a timely manner. Our findings reveal that the stated willingness to adopt time-variant tariffs decreases as the potential price volatility increases. Moreover, there is a strong positive correlation between the willingness to adopt time-variant tariffs and the willingness to provide energy demand flexibility. The results of our analysis further indicate that early adopters of energy-efficient technologies and supporters of climate policies are more inclined towards time-variant pricing and providing flexibility in their electricity consumption. Economic preferences, such as loss aversion and present bias, appear to be particularly relevant for adopting the RTP tariff. These insights offer valuable guidance for promoting time-variant tariffs and flexible energy consumption, facilitating the adoption of efficient and sustainable energy systems.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信