Consolidative and salvage thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) with first-line chemoimmunotherapy: a retrospective study from a single cancer center
{"title":"Consolidative and salvage thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) with first-line chemoimmunotherapy: a retrospective study from a single cancer center","authors":"Aihua Lan , Huiling Dong , Zhiqin Zheng , Xiao Chu , Zhengfei Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) continues to have poor outcome despite the survival improvements achieved by chemoimmunotherapy. Controversy exists regarding the survival effectiveness of consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cTRT), and the role of salvage thoracic radiotherapy (sTRT) remains unexplored in the immunotherapy era. To address these issues, we conducted this retrospective study to investigate the impacts of cTRT and sTRT in ES-SCLC, and to compare the survival benefits of the two treatment regimes. ES-SCLC patients without baseline brain metastases receiving standard first-line chemoimmunotherapy were included in our study, cohorts were divided by treatment with cTRT, sTRT and no TRT. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test were performed for comparison of survival between different groups. Univariable and multivariate analyses were carried out for further estimating the survival effectiveness of TRT. A total of 100 ES-SCLC patients without baseline brain metastases were included in our study, with 24 (24.0%) were allocated to the cTRT group, 18 (18.0%) were allocated to the sTRT group, and 58 (58.0%) to the No TRT group. cTRT dramatically decreased the rate of intrathoracic failure compared to sTRT and No TRT (29.4% vs. 60.0%). Moreover, patients who received cTRT had better overall survival (OS) compared to those who did not receive cTRT (median OS, not reached vs. 14.1 months; HR=0.40, 95% CI: 0.22-0.70, P=0.01). However, cTRT did not show significantly superior OS compared to sTRT alone (median OS, not reached vs. 21.0 months; HR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.27-1.66, P=0.39). In contrast, patients with only thoracic oligo-progression receiving sTRT (N=13) harbored better OS compared to patients with the same progression pattern in No TRT group (N=20) (median OS, 28.6 vs. 13.8 months; HR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.20-0.98, P=0.04). In conclusion, our study demonstrated in the chemoimmunotherapy era that cTRT greatly reduced the rate of initial intrathoracic failure and significantly improved the OS of ES-SCLC. Additionally, sTRT showed similar OS benefits with cTRT, and exhibits better OS compared to No TRT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101373"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524003675","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) continues to have poor outcome despite the survival improvements achieved by chemoimmunotherapy. Controversy exists regarding the survival effectiveness of consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cTRT), and the role of salvage thoracic radiotherapy (sTRT) remains unexplored in the immunotherapy era. To address these issues, we conducted this retrospective study to investigate the impacts of cTRT and sTRT in ES-SCLC, and to compare the survival benefits of the two treatment regimes. ES-SCLC patients without baseline brain metastases receiving standard first-line chemoimmunotherapy were included in our study, cohorts were divided by treatment with cTRT, sTRT and no TRT. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test were performed for comparison of survival between different groups. Univariable and multivariate analyses were carried out for further estimating the survival effectiveness of TRT. A total of 100 ES-SCLC patients without baseline brain metastases were included in our study, with 24 (24.0%) were allocated to the cTRT group, 18 (18.0%) were allocated to the sTRT group, and 58 (58.0%) to the No TRT group. cTRT dramatically decreased the rate of intrathoracic failure compared to sTRT and No TRT (29.4% vs. 60.0%). Moreover, patients who received cTRT had better overall survival (OS) compared to those who did not receive cTRT (median OS, not reached vs. 14.1 months; HR=0.40, 95% CI: 0.22-0.70, P=0.01). However, cTRT did not show significantly superior OS compared to sTRT alone (median OS, not reached vs. 21.0 months; HR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.27-1.66, P=0.39). In contrast, patients with only thoracic oligo-progression receiving sTRT (N=13) harbored better OS compared to patients with the same progression pattern in No TRT group (N=20) (median OS, 28.6 vs. 13.8 months; HR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.20-0.98, P=0.04). In conclusion, our study demonstrated in the chemoimmunotherapy era that cTRT greatly reduced the rate of initial intrathoracic failure and significantly improved the OS of ES-SCLC. Additionally, sTRT showed similar OS benefits with cTRT, and exhibits better OS compared to No TRT.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.