Clinical and molecular characteristics, therapeutic strategy, and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring primary and acquired BRAF mutations

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Xiangran Feng, Yi Xiang
{"title":"Clinical and molecular characteristics, therapeutic strategy, and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring primary and acquired BRAF mutations","authors":"Xiangran Feng,&nbsp;Yi Xiang","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>BRAF oncogene is a rare genetic alteration in NSCLC. Acquired BRAF mutations are an emerging resistance mechanism to EGFR TKIs. The differences in clinical and genetic characteristics, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes in NSCLC patients harboring primary and acquired BRAF mutations are still poorly understood.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From Oct 2017 to Dec 2023, 10, 211 lung cancer patients at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital were reviewed. 88 primary BRAF-mutated and 15 acquired BRAF-mutated NSCLC patients resistant to EGFR TKIs were included in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Primary BRAF-mutated patients preferentially occurred in the elderly (median age: 67 versus 61, p=0.015), males (53.4% vs 26.7%, p=0.056), former/current smokers (36.5% vs 6.7%, p=0.033), non-adenocarcinoma (11.4% vs 0%, P=0.351) compared to acquired BRAF-mutated patient. There were significant differences between the primary BRAF/EGFR co-mutated group and the non-EGFR co-mutated group in terms of gender (males: 33.3% vs 62.3%, p=0.012), smoking history (22.2% vs 43.1%, p=0.063), and histological types (adenocarcinomas: 100% vs 83.6%, p=0.028). The clinical characteristics between primary and acquired BRAF/EGFR co-mutated patients were similar. The most frequently coexisting oncogenes of primary and acquired BRAF-mutated NSCLC patients were EGFR mutations (30.7% and 93.3%). And the genotype of concomitant EGFR mutation differed. In the acquired BRAF-mutated cohorts, the genotype of EGFR mutations was more complex than primary and contained more dual EGFR mutations (35.7%). For primary BRAF/EGFR co-mutated patients, no matter what kinds of therapies, the EGFR 19del patients had a better prognosis than non-19del patients, and the first line mPFS was NR and 9.0 months (95% CI: 7.7-10.3 months) (p=0.0062), respectively. Dabrafenib and trametinib plus 3<sup>rd</sup> EGFR TKIs improved the prognosis of primary BRAF/EGFR non-19del co-mutated patients, achieving ORR and mPFS of 100% (3/3) and 12 months. For acquired co-mutated patients, the mPFS for 5 patients was 8.6 months (95% CI: 5.4-11.8 months). No new safety concerns and &gt; grade 3 AEs were noted.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The most frequently coexisting oncogenes of primary and acquired BRAF-mutated NSCLC patients were EGFR mutations. There were significant differences between the primary BRAF/EGFR co-mutated group and the non-EGFR co-mutated group in gender, smoking history, and histological types. The primary and acquired BRAF/EGFR co-mutated patients showed similar clinical characteristics but different co-mutated EGFR genotypes. Triple-target therapy (dabrafenib, trametinib plus 3<sup>rd</sup> EGFR TKIs) could be considered the preferential regimen for acquired BRAF/EGFR co-mutated and primary BRAF/EGFR non-19del co-mutated NSCLC patients. As for the primary BRAF/EGFR 19del co-mutated patients, the preferred first-line treatments still are EGFR TKIs -based targeted therapies in real-world clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101393"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524003870","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

BRAF oncogene is a rare genetic alteration in NSCLC. Acquired BRAF mutations are an emerging resistance mechanism to EGFR TKIs. The differences in clinical and genetic characteristics, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes in NSCLC patients harboring primary and acquired BRAF mutations are still poorly understood.

Methods

From Oct 2017 to Dec 2023, 10, 211 lung cancer patients at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital were reviewed. 88 primary BRAF-mutated and 15 acquired BRAF-mutated NSCLC patients resistant to EGFR TKIs were included in the study.

Findings

Primary BRAF-mutated patients preferentially occurred in the elderly (median age: 67 versus 61, p=0.015), males (53.4% vs 26.7%, p=0.056), former/current smokers (36.5% vs 6.7%, p=0.033), non-adenocarcinoma (11.4% vs 0%, P=0.351) compared to acquired BRAF-mutated patient. There were significant differences between the primary BRAF/EGFR co-mutated group and the non-EGFR co-mutated group in terms of gender (males: 33.3% vs 62.3%, p=0.012), smoking history (22.2% vs 43.1%, p=0.063), and histological types (adenocarcinomas: 100% vs 83.6%, p=0.028). The clinical characteristics between primary and acquired BRAF/EGFR co-mutated patients were similar. The most frequently coexisting oncogenes of primary and acquired BRAF-mutated NSCLC patients were EGFR mutations (30.7% and 93.3%). And the genotype of concomitant EGFR mutation differed. In the acquired BRAF-mutated cohorts, the genotype of EGFR mutations was more complex than primary and contained more dual EGFR mutations (35.7%). For primary BRAF/EGFR co-mutated patients, no matter what kinds of therapies, the EGFR 19del patients had a better prognosis than non-19del patients, and the first line mPFS was NR and 9.0 months (95% CI: 7.7-10.3 months) (p=0.0062), respectively. Dabrafenib and trametinib plus 3rd EGFR TKIs improved the prognosis of primary BRAF/EGFR non-19del co-mutated patients, achieving ORR and mPFS of 100% (3/3) and 12 months. For acquired co-mutated patients, the mPFS for 5 patients was 8.6 months (95% CI: 5.4-11.8 months). No new safety concerns and > grade 3 AEs were noted.

Interpretation

The most frequently coexisting oncogenes of primary and acquired BRAF-mutated NSCLC patients were EGFR mutations. There were significant differences between the primary BRAF/EGFR co-mutated group and the non-EGFR co-mutated group in gender, smoking history, and histological types. The primary and acquired BRAF/EGFR co-mutated patients showed similar clinical characteristics but different co-mutated EGFR genotypes. Triple-target therapy (dabrafenib, trametinib plus 3rd EGFR TKIs) could be considered the preferential regimen for acquired BRAF/EGFR co-mutated and primary BRAF/EGFR non-19del co-mutated NSCLC patients. As for the primary BRAF/EGFR 19del co-mutated patients, the preferred first-line treatments still are EGFR TKIs -based targeted therapies in real-world clinical practice.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信