Plasma metabolite biomarker identification study for the early detection of gastric cancer

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Juan Zhu , Yida Huang , Bin Liu , Xue Li , Li Yuan , Le Wang , Kun Qian , Yingying Mao , Lingbin Du , Xiangdong Cheng
{"title":"Plasma metabolite biomarker identification study for the early detection of gastric cancer","authors":"Juan Zhu ,&nbsp;Yida Huang ,&nbsp;Bin Liu ,&nbsp;Xue Li ,&nbsp;Li Yuan ,&nbsp;Le Wang ,&nbsp;Kun Qian ,&nbsp;Yingying Mao ,&nbsp;Lingbin Du ,&nbsp;Xiangdong Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most prevalent and the fifth deadliest cancer worldwide, and timely diagnosis of GC contributes to an increased survival rate. However, current detection methods for GC mainly rely on gastroscopy examination, limited by relatively low compliance. We attempted to identify plasma metabolite biomarkers and develop a diagnostic model for GC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 597 subjects, including healthy controls and GC patients were recruited from multiple centers in China. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry–based metabolomics methods were used to characterize the subjects’ plasma metabolic profiles and to screen and validate the GC biomarkers. Five machine learning algorithms (neural network, support vector machine, ridge regression, lasso regression and Naïve Bayes) were used to build a diagnostic model. We compared the performance of the metabolic panel with risk factors and clinical protein biomarkers (CA724, CA199, CA242, CA125, CEA and AFP), involving sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC and clinical net benefit.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A plasma metabolite biomarker panel consisting of 6 metabolites was constructed and identified for GC diagnosis. Among the five machine learning algorithms, the neural network algorithm demonstrated the best diagnostic performance, achieving AUC of 0.982 (95% CI: 0.965–0.998) and 0.951 (95% CI: 0.931–0.970) in the discovery and validation dataset, respectively. The panel's sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (95% CI) were 0.940 (0.825–0.984), 0.936 (0.861–0.974), and 0.938 (0.881–0.969) in the discovery set, and 0.925 (0.881–0.954), 0.867 (0.814–0.907), and 0.896 (0.864–0.922) in the validation set, respectively. The panel also exhibited superior diagnostic performance in detecting early-stage GC, with the ridge regression algorithm achieving the best performance (AUC: 0.982, 95% CI: 0.965–0.998 and 0.951, 0.931–0.970 in the discovery and validation dataset). This panel significantly outperforms clinical protein biomarkers in sensitivity. For instance, CA724, the most sensitive clinical biomarker for GC, showed sensitivities of only 0.240 (95% CI: 0.131–0.382) in the discovery dataset and 0.148 (95% CI: 0.103–0.203) in the validation dataset.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The discovered and validated serum metabolite biomarker panel exhibits good diagnostic performance for the early detection of GC, highlighting the potential in clinical practice for GC diagnosis and offering insights into the metabolic characterization of diseases including but not limited to GC.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>This study was supported by grants from the <span>Medical and Health Research Project of Zhejiang Province</span> (2024KY050), <span>Zhejiang Cancer Hospital's National Natural Science Foundation</span> Cultivation Fund (PY2022042) and <span>Zhejiang Cancer Hospital Youth Research Fund</span> (QN202201).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101322"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660652400316X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most prevalent and the fifth deadliest cancer worldwide, and timely diagnosis of GC contributes to an increased survival rate. However, current detection methods for GC mainly rely on gastroscopy examination, limited by relatively low compliance. We attempted to identify plasma metabolite biomarkers and develop a diagnostic model for GC.

Methods

A total of 597 subjects, including healthy controls and GC patients were recruited from multiple centers in China. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry–based metabolomics methods were used to characterize the subjects’ plasma metabolic profiles and to screen and validate the GC biomarkers. Five machine learning algorithms (neural network, support vector machine, ridge regression, lasso regression and Naïve Bayes) were used to build a diagnostic model. We compared the performance of the metabolic panel with risk factors and clinical protein biomarkers (CA724, CA199, CA242, CA125, CEA and AFP), involving sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC and clinical net benefit.

Findings

A plasma metabolite biomarker panel consisting of 6 metabolites was constructed and identified for GC diagnosis. Among the five machine learning algorithms, the neural network algorithm demonstrated the best diagnostic performance, achieving AUC of 0.982 (95% CI: 0.965–0.998) and 0.951 (95% CI: 0.931–0.970) in the discovery and validation dataset, respectively. The panel's sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (95% CI) were 0.940 (0.825–0.984), 0.936 (0.861–0.974), and 0.938 (0.881–0.969) in the discovery set, and 0.925 (0.881–0.954), 0.867 (0.814–0.907), and 0.896 (0.864–0.922) in the validation set, respectively. The panel also exhibited superior diagnostic performance in detecting early-stage GC, with the ridge regression algorithm achieving the best performance (AUC: 0.982, 95% CI: 0.965–0.998 and 0.951, 0.931–0.970 in the discovery and validation dataset). This panel significantly outperforms clinical protein biomarkers in sensitivity. For instance, CA724, the most sensitive clinical biomarker for GC, showed sensitivities of only 0.240 (95% CI: 0.131–0.382) in the discovery dataset and 0.148 (95% CI: 0.103–0.203) in the validation dataset.

Interpretation

The discovered and validated serum metabolite biomarker panel exhibits good diagnostic performance for the early detection of GC, highlighting the potential in clinical practice for GC diagnosis and offering insights into the metabolic characterization of diseases including but not limited to GC.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Medical and Health Research Project of Zhejiang Province (2024KY050), Zhejiang Cancer Hospital's National Natural Science Foundation Cultivation Fund (PY2022042) and Zhejiang Cancer Hospital Youth Research Fund (QN202201).
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信