Sentinel lymph node biopsy using dye alone in patients with initially cN1 breast cancer and ycN0 status after neoadjuvant therapy: a multicenter diagnostic trial

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ang Zheng , Lei Zhang , Yu Cao , Dian-Long Zhang , Fei Ma , Jian-Yi Li , Fan Yao , Li Ma , Pei-Fen Fu , Jia Wang , Jian-Yun Nie , Ying-Ying Xu , Bao-Liang Guo , Feng Jin , Bo Chen
{"title":"Sentinel lymph node biopsy using dye alone in patients with initially cN1 breast cancer and ycN0 status after neoadjuvant therapy: a multicenter diagnostic trial","authors":"Ang Zheng ,&nbsp;Lei Zhang ,&nbsp;Yu Cao ,&nbsp;Dian-Long Zhang ,&nbsp;Fei Ma ,&nbsp;Jian-Yi Li ,&nbsp;Fan Yao ,&nbsp;Li Ma ,&nbsp;Pei-Fen Fu ,&nbsp;Jia Wang ,&nbsp;Jian-Yun Nie ,&nbsp;Ying-Ying Xu ,&nbsp;Bao-Liang Guo ,&nbsp;Feng Jin ,&nbsp;Bo Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Given the known complications associated with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and the limited application of radiolabeled colloid tracking in China, dye-only sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is proposed as a feasible and alternative surgical treatment strategy for patients with initially clinically node-positive (cN1) breast cancer to a clinically node-negative (ycN0) status after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). However, the clinical diagnostic performance of dye-only SLNB needs further verification.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a multicenter diagnostic clinical trial from July 2019 to September 2023 by recruiting 230 patients from 12 participating centers across six provinces in China. Adult women with clinical stage T1-4N1M0 breast cancer and ycN0 status after NAT were eligible. SLNB and ALND were performed sequentially for patients, while a single dye was used to guide sentinel lymph nodes during the operation. The primary endpoint was the false-negative rate (FNR) of SLNB after NAT in women with ycN0 disease. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were conducted by age, body mass index (BMI), the number of SLNs removed and tumor subtype. The trial is registered on <span><span>www.chictr.org.cn</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (identifier: ChiCTR1900026929) and <span><span>www.isrctn.com</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (identifier: ISRCTN31364289).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The detection rate of single-dye was 95.22% (219/230). Pathological examinations showed positive lymph node findings in 117 of 230 patients. SLNB was successful in 212 out of the 219 patients (96.80%). The FNR of dye-alone SLNB was 5.98% (7/117; 95% CI, 2.44%-11.94%). Furthermore, the FNR was lower in women under 60 years of age (2.33% vs. 16.13% older than 60 years, <em>P</em>=0.0139), with body mass index under 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (2.60% vs. 12.5%, <em>P</em>=0.0452), and with four or more SLNs (2.53% vs. 13.16% with fewer than four SLNs, <em>P</em>=0.0358). For HR negative/HER-2 positive cases, the FNR was 0%.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>SLNB with dye alone in patients with initially cN1 breast cancer and ycN0 after neoadjuvant therapy resulted in clinically acceptable rate of FNR. When four or more SLNs are detected, patients with age ≤ 60 years, BMI&lt;25km/m<sup>2</sup> and Her2-positive would derive additional benefit from dye-alone SLNB.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>This trial was funded by Tackling Key Problems and Serving Local Projects of Liaoning Province (ZF20190006, to BC), <span>National Natural Science Foundation of China</span> (82073282 and 82203873, to AZ) and Joint Fund Project of the Science and Technology Program of Liaoning Province (2023012141-JH3/4600, to AZ).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101315"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524003092","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Given the known complications associated with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and the limited application of radiolabeled colloid tracking in China, dye-only sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is proposed as a feasible and alternative surgical treatment strategy for patients with initially clinically node-positive (cN1) breast cancer to a clinically node-negative (ycN0) status after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). However, the clinical diagnostic performance of dye-only SLNB needs further verification.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter diagnostic clinical trial from July 2019 to September 2023 by recruiting 230 patients from 12 participating centers across six provinces in China. Adult women with clinical stage T1-4N1M0 breast cancer and ycN0 status after NAT were eligible. SLNB and ALND were performed sequentially for patients, while a single dye was used to guide sentinel lymph nodes during the operation. The primary endpoint was the false-negative rate (FNR) of SLNB after NAT in women with ycN0 disease. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were conducted by age, body mass index (BMI), the number of SLNs removed and tumor subtype. The trial is registered on www.chictr.org.cn (identifier: ChiCTR1900026929) and www.isrctn.com (identifier: ISRCTN31364289).

Findings

The detection rate of single-dye was 95.22% (219/230). Pathological examinations showed positive lymph node findings in 117 of 230 patients. SLNB was successful in 212 out of the 219 patients (96.80%). The FNR of dye-alone SLNB was 5.98% (7/117; 95% CI, 2.44%-11.94%). Furthermore, the FNR was lower in women under 60 years of age (2.33% vs. 16.13% older than 60 years, P=0.0139), with body mass index under 25 kg/m2 (2.60% vs. 12.5%, P=0.0452), and with four or more SLNs (2.53% vs. 13.16% with fewer than four SLNs, P=0.0358). For HR negative/HER-2 positive cases, the FNR was 0%.

Interpretation

SLNB with dye alone in patients with initially cN1 breast cancer and ycN0 after neoadjuvant therapy resulted in clinically acceptable rate of FNR. When four or more SLNs are detected, patients with age ≤ 60 years, BMI<25km/m2 and Her2-positive would derive additional benefit from dye-alone SLNB.

Funding

This trial was funded by Tackling Key Problems and Serving Local Projects of Liaoning Province (ZF20190006, to BC), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82073282 and 82203873, to AZ) and Joint Fund Project of the Science and Technology Program of Liaoning Province (2023012141-JH3/4600, to AZ).
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信