Vertical and horizontal space-valence associations: A meta-analysis

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Jan Pohl , Alex Miklashevsky
{"title":"Vertical and horizontal space-valence associations: A meta-analysis","authors":"Jan Pohl ,&nbsp;Alex Miklashevsky","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research found associations between lower vs. upper space and negative vs. positive stimuli correspondingly (vertical Space-Valence Associations, SVAs) and between the left vs. right side and negative vs. positive stimuli correspondingly (horizontal SVAs). We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of SVAs for both dimensions in behavioral studies. We tested the robustness of SVAs and examined factors potentially modulating them: participants’ culture, handedness, gender, age, the exact valence domain under study, the experimental task, type of stimuli, publication year, and statistics used. Articles were extracted from Web of Science, PubMed, and ScienceDirect in February 2021. Overall, 91 articles with 199 experiments and 21,951 participants were included in the final analysis.</div><div>We found robust evidence of SVAs in vertical (<em>r</em> = .440, <em>k</em> = 111 experiments) and horizontal dimensions (<em>r</em> = .310; <em>k</em> = 88 experiments), with little evidence for literature biases. The distribution of effect sizes was highly heterogeneous, even after subgroup analyses, which indicates unidentified factors varying across studies. Experiments on vertical SVAs explicitly asking participants to evaluate valence showed larger effect sizes than experiments where valence remained task-irrelevant. There was a robust effect of handedness on horizontal SVAs: Participants associated positive stimuli with the side of their dominant hand. There was also some evidence of cultural influences on the horizontal SVAs.</div><div>Overall, our meta-analysis revealed a hierarchy of factors modulating activation of SVAs, which includes both situated and embodied factors. It is, therefore, essential to focus on specific concept categories and contexts rather than consider abstract concepts in general.</div></div><div><h3>Public significance statement</h3><div>This meta-analysis revealed medium effects of space-valence associations: Upper/right space is associated with positive and lower/right space with negative concepts. On the vertical dimension, this effect is modulated by valence being task-relevant, e.g., directly asking people about valence results in stronger associations. For the horizontal dimension, left-handers robustly showed a reversed effect (i.e., left is good); horizontal space-valence associations might be even stronger in non-Western countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 106054"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425000545","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research found associations between lower vs. upper space and negative vs. positive stimuli correspondingly (vertical Space-Valence Associations, SVAs) and between the left vs. right side and negative vs. positive stimuli correspondingly (horizontal SVAs). We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of SVAs for both dimensions in behavioral studies. We tested the robustness of SVAs and examined factors potentially modulating them: participants’ culture, handedness, gender, age, the exact valence domain under study, the experimental task, type of stimuli, publication year, and statistics used. Articles were extracted from Web of Science, PubMed, and ScienceDirect in February 2021. Overall, 91 articles with 199 experiments and 21,951 participants were included in the final analysis.
We found robust evidence of SVAs in vertical (r = .440, k = 111 experiments) and horizontal dimensions (r = .310; k = 88 experiments), with little evidence for literature biases. The distribution of effect sizes was highly heterogeneous, even after subgroup analyses, which indicates unidentified factors varying across studies. Experiments on vertical SVAs explicitly asking participants to evaluate valence showed larger effect sizes than experiments where valence remained task-irrelevant. There was a robust effect of handedness on horizontal SVAs: Participants associated positive stimuli with the side of their dominant hand. There was also some evidence of cultural influences on the horizontal SVAs.
Overall, our meta-analysis revealed a hierarchy of factors modulating activation of SVAs, which includes both situated and embodied factors. It is, therefore, essential to focus on specific concept categories and contexts rather than consider abstract concepts in general.

Public significance statement

This meta-analysis revealed medium effects of space-valence associations: Upper/right space is associated with positive and lower/right space with negative concepts. On the vertical dimension, this effect is modulated by valence being task-relevant, e.g., directly asking people about valence results in stronger associations. For the horizontal dimension, left-handers robustly showed a reversed effect (i.e., left is good); horizontal space-valence associations might be even stronger in non-Western countries.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信