Impact of botulinum toxin type A on ocular pain with neuropathic features

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Elyana V.T. Locatelli , Jaxon J. Huang , Jason D. Betz , Jordan J. Huang , Nicole B. Kantor , Nicholas Reyes , Elizabeth R. Felix , Wendy W. Lee , Anat Galor
{"title":"Impact of botulinum toxin type A on ocular pain with neuropathic features","authors":"Elyana V.T. Locatelli ,&nbsp;Jaxon J. Huang ,&nbsp;Jason D. Betz ,&nbsp;Jordan J. Huang ,&nbsp;Nicole B. Kantor ,&nbsp;Nicholas Reyes ,&nbsp;Elizabeth R. Felix ,&nbsp;Wendy W. Lee ,&nbsp;Anat Galor","doi":"10.1016/j.jtos.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate the impact of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) on neuropathic/nociplastic ocular pain (NOP) and identify predictors of patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study of individuals with NOP symptoms (light sensitivity, wind/air sensitivity, persistent pain despite dry eye treatment) who received ≥1 BoNT-A injection. Primary outcome measures included if (responders vs. non-responders) and to what degree (none vs. mild vs. moderate vs. marked) individuals experienced pain improvement 4–6 weeks post-injection. Demographics and clinical exam information was compared between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>27 individuals received BoNT-A for NOP symptoms. 74 % (n = 20) reported an improvement in pain and were classified as responders. Among responders, the degree of benefit varied, with 25 % reporting mild, 45 % moderate, and 30 % marked pain improvement. Improvements in light sensitivity (37 %), wind/air sensitivity (33 %), and quality of life (QoL) (59 %) were reported by fewer individuals. 80 % of responders and 0 % of non-responders reported QoL improvements afer BoNT-A. In a multivariable model that examined predictors of response (none to marked, 0–3), the presence of fibromyalgia (FM) (β = 0.50; p = 0.004) portended a better response, while shooting pain (β = −0.47; p = 0.007) portended a worse response to BoNT-A, (full model r<sup>2</sup> = 0.53; p &lt; 0.001). Degree of pain improvement significantly correlated with improvements in light sensitivity, wind/air sensitivity, and QoL (ρ range: 0.42–0.63; p &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>After BoNT-A, most individuals reported improved ocular pain and QoL, while fewer noted improved light and wind/air sensitivity. Some systemic and ocular factors predicted treatment response and may thus guide treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54691,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Surface","volume":"37 ","pages":"Pages 24-32"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Surface","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542012425000308","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the impact of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) on neuropathic/nociplastic ocular pain (NOP) and identify predictors of patient outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective study of individuals with NOP symptoms (light sensitivity, wind/air sensitivity, persistent pain despite dry eye treatment) who received ≥1 BoNT-A injection. Primary outcome measures included if (responders vs. non-responders) and to what degree (none vs. mild vs. moderate vs. marked) individuals experienced pain improvement 4–6 weeks post-injection. Demographics and clinical exam information was compared between the groups.

Results

27 individuals received BoNT-A for NOP symptoms. 74 % (n = 20) reported an improvement in pain and were classified as responders. Among responders, the degree of benefit varied, with 25 % reporting mild, 45 % moderate, and 30 % marked pain improvement. Improvements in light sensitivity (37 %), wind/air sensitivity (33 %), and quality of life (QoL) (59 %) were reported by fewer individuals. 80 % of responders and 0 % of non-responders reported QoL improvements afer BoNT-A. In a multivariable model that examined predictors of response (none to marked, 0–3), the presence of fibromyalgia (FM) (β = 0.50; p = 0.004) portended a better response, while shooting pain (β = −0.47; p = 0.007) portended a worse response to BoNT-A, (full model r2 = 0.53; p < 0.001). Degree of pain improvement significantly correlated with improvements in light sensitivity, wind/air sensitivity, and QoL (ρ range: 0.42–0.63; p < 0.05).

Conclusion

After BoNT-A, most individuals reported improved ocular pain and QoL, while fewer noted improved light and wind/air sensitivity. Some systemic and ocular factors predicted treatment response and may thus guide treatment.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ocular Surface
Ocular Surface 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
14.10%
发文量
97
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Ocular Surface, a quarterly, a peer-reviewed journal, is an authoritative resource that integrates and interprets major findings in diverse fields related to the ocular surface, including ophthalmology, optometry, genetics, molecular biology, pharmacology, immunology, infectious disease, and epidemiology. Its critical review articles cover the most current knowledge on medical and surgical management of ocular surface pathology, new understandings of ocular surface physiology, the meaning of recent discoveries on how the ocular surface responds to injury and disease, and updates on drug and device development. The journal also publishes select original research reports and articles describing cutting-edge techniques and technology in the field. Benefits to authors We also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services. Please see our Guide for Authors for information on article submission. If you require any further information or help, please visit our Support Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信