Is cardiopulmonary transit time (CPTT) measured by using dynamic rubidium cardiac PET/CT a predictor for cardiac function?

Lena C Seige, Boya Zhang, Jakob Heimer, Noel Spielhofer, Cristina Popescu, Karsten Murray, Christian La Fougère, Irene A Burger, Alexander W Sauter
{"title":"Is cardiopulmonary transit time (CPTT) measured by using dynamic rubidium cardiac PET/CT a predictor for cardiac function?","authors":"Lena C Seige, Boya Zhang, Jakob Heimer, Noel Spielhofer, Cristina Popescu, Karsten Murray, Christian La Fougère, Irene A Burger, Alexander W Sauter","doi":"10.1007/s10554-025-03346-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiopulmonary transit time (CPTT) represents the time needed for the circulation of blood from the right to the left ventricle. This parameter can be measured during dynamic acquisition of rubidium ([<sup>82</sup>Rb]) cardiac PET/CT. To further characterize this marker, we wanted to assess the association between CPTT and parameters of cardiac function derived from echocardiography. Retrospective single center analysis of patients referred to [<sup>82</sup>Rb]RbCl-PET/CT with rest/stress protocol on an integrated hybrid PET/CT system (Biograph mCT, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) and echocardiography within 100 days. After intravenous injection of 7.5 MBq/kg [<sup>82</sup>Rb]RbCl dynamic scans with initially 12 × 10 s frames were started. For data analysis a volume of interest (VOI) was drawn in the left and right ventricle using dedicated software. The difference between the peak time for the two time activity curves (TAC) was extracted as CPTT and normalized for heart rate (NCPTT). Associations between NCPTT and echo parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction (EF<sub>Echo</sub>) were analyzed using linear regression models. 44 patients (sex: 28 male, 16 female) were enrolled with a time difference between PET and echocardiography of 19.65 ± 23.3 days. 9 patients had a rest CPTT of 0 s, 32 patients 10 s and 3 patients 20 s. The association between EF<sub>Echo</sub> and NCPTT revealed a significant negative correlation (beta = -0.77; CI: -1.32, -0.22; p = 0.007). Given this association, univariate predictive models for EF<sub>Echo</sub> were applied. Root mean square error was 6.83% for the EF<sub>PET</sub>, and 6.0% for NCPTT, which indicates a slightly higher predictive performance for the NCPTT model with a lower error. Pulmonary transit time can be estimated with [<sup>82</sup>Rb]RbCl-PET/CT, with a high positive association to rest EF<sub>Echo</sub>. However, smaller time frames than 10 s are needed, for more accurate estimation of cardiac function.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":"569-577"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11880084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03346-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary transit time (CPTT) represents the time needed for the circulation of blood from the right to the left ventricle. This parameter can be measured during dynamic acquisition of rubidium ([82Rb]) cardiac PET/CT. To further characterize this marker, we wanted to assess the association between CPTT and parameters of cardiac function derived from echocardiography. Retrospective single center analysis of patients referred to [82Rb]RbCl-PET/CT with rest/stress protocol on an integrated hybrid PET/CT system (Biograph mCT, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) and echocardiography within 100 days. After intravenous injection of 7.5 MBq/kg [82Rb]RbCl dynamic scans with initially 12 × 10 s frames were started. For data analysis a volume of interest (VOI) was drawn in the left and right ventricle using dedicated software. The difference between the peak time for the two time activity curves (TAC) was extracted as CPTT and normalized for heart rate (NCPTT). Associations between NCPTT and echo parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction (EFEcho) were analyzed using linear regression models. 44 patients (sex: 28 male, 16 female) were enrolled with a time difference between PET and echocardiography of 19.65 ± 23.3 days. 9 patients had a rest CPTT of 0 s, 32 patients 10 s and 3 patients 20 s. The association between EFEcho and NCPTT revealed a significant negative correlation (beta = -0.77; CI: -1.32, -0.22; p = 0.007). Given this association, univariate predictive models for EFEcho were applied. Root mean square error was 6.83% for the EFPET, and 6.0% for NCPTT, which indicates a slightly higher predictive performance for the NCPTT model with a lower error. Pulmonary transit time can be estimated with [82Rb]RbCl-PET/CT, with a high positive association to rest EFEcho. However, smaller time frames than 10 s are needed, for more accurate estimation of cardiac function.

使用动态铷心脏PET/CT测量的心肺传递时间(CPTT)是心功能的预测指标吗?
心肺传递时间(CPTT)表示血液从右心室到左心室循环所需的时间。该参数可在动态获取铷([82Rb])心脏PET/CT时测量。为了进一步表征这一标志物,我们想评估CPTT与超声心动图得出的心功能参数之间的关系。回顾性单中心分析[82Rb]在综合混合PET/CT系统(Biograph mCT, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany)和超声心动图上进行RbCl-PET/CT休息/应激方案的100天内患者。静脉注射7.5 MBq/kg [82Rb]RbCl后,开始初始12 × 10 s帧动态扫描。为了进行数据分析,使用专用软件在左心室和右心室绘制兴趣体积(VOI)。将两种时间活动曲线(TAC)的峰值时间之差提取为CPTT,并归一化为心率(NCPTT)。采用线性回归模型分析NCPTT与左心室射血分数(EFEcho)等回声参数之间的关系。44例患者(性别:男28例,女16例),PET与超声心动图时差19.65±23.3天。休息CPTT 0 s 9例,10 s 32例,20 s 3例。EFEcho与NCPTT呈显著负相关(β = -0.77;Ci: -1.32, -0.22;p = 0.007)。考虑到这种关联,应用了EFEcho的单变量预测模型。EFPET的均方根误差为6.83%,NCPTT的均方根误差为6.0%,这表明NCPTT模型的预测性能略高,误差较小。[82Rb]RbCl-PET/CT可估计肺传递时间,与静止EFEcho高度正相关。然而,为了更准确地估计心功能,需要比10秒更短的时间框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信