Clinical Predictors of the Forgotten Joint Score 12 in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Weston Carpenter, Sara Strecker, Matthew Solomito, Robert James Carangelo, Daniel Witmer
{"title":"Clinical Predictors of the Forgotten Joint Score 12 in Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Weston Carpenter, Sara Strecker, Matthew Solomito, Robert James Carangelo, Daniel Witmer","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) have become a key criterion for determining patient satisfaction following orthopaedic procedures like total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The Forgotten Joint Score 12 (FJS-12) is designed to evaluate if a patient is aware of their replaced joint. Little literature exists surrounding the predictive power of other metrics on the FJS-12. In this paper, differences in these clinical metrics were assessed between groups of patients who scored above the FJS-12 cutoff and those who did not after TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent primary elective TKA and answered all required PROs during the designated study period were included. Using an established cutoff of 33.3, patients were put in a \"Forgotten Joint Group\" or a \"Remembered Joint Group.\" This study included 672 patients who fit the criteria. Of these, 508 (76%) forgot their joints and 164 (24%) remembered their joints at twelve months. Differences in clinical metrics between the two groups were assessed for significance using univariate analyses (t-test, Chi-square, Fisher's Exact). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was then used to determine the predictive value of metrics that showed these significant differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Early results from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and Numeric Pain Scale (NPS) were strongly correlative of the twelve-month FJS-12 score, rather than patient demographics. Patients who scored above 65.1 or 72.1 on the KOOS-JR three and six months after surgery, respectively, or below a 3 on the NPS three and/or six months after surgery were also favored to forget their replaced joint at twelve months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying predictors of the FJS-12 allows for the recognition of at-risk patients before the twelve-month time point, facilitating earlier intervention and improving care after surgery. The scope of this analysis may be broadened in the future to include other arthroplasty procedures, such as for the hip and shoulder.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.02.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) have become a key criterion for determining patient satisfaction following orthopaedic procedures like total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The Forgotten Joint Score 12 (FJS-12) is designed to evaluate if a patient is aware of their replaced joint. Little literature exists surrounding the predictive power of other metrics on the FJS-12. In this paper, differences in these clinical metrics were assessed between groups of patients who scored above the FJS-12 cutoff and those who did not after TKA.

Methods: Patients who underwent primary elective TKA and answered all required PROs during the designated study period were included. Using an established cutoff of 33.3, patients were put in a "Forgotten Joint Group" or a "Remembered Joint Group." This study included 672 patients who fit the criteria. Of these, 508 (76%) forgot their joints and 164 (24%) remembered their joints at twelve months. Differences in clinical metrics between the two groups were assessed for significance using univariate analyses (t-test, Chi-square, Fisher's Exact). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was then used to determine the predictive value of metrics that showed these significant differences.

Results: Early results from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and Numeric Pain Scale (NPS) were strongly correlative of the twelve-month FJS-12 score, rather than patient demographics. Patients who scored above 65.1 or 72.1 on the KOOS-JR three and six months after surgery, respectively, or below a 3 on the NPS three and/or six months after surgery were also favored to forget their replaced joint at twelve months.

Conclusion: Identifying predictors of the FJS-12 allows for the recognition of at-risk patients before the twelve-month time point, facilitating earlier intervention and improving care after surgery. The scope of this analysis may be broadened in the future to include other arthroplasty procedures, such as for the hip and shoulder.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信