Patient Frailty in Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Implementation of a Frailty Score Using an Electronic Medical Record.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Casey M O'Connor, Ameer Tabbaa, Luba Ayzenshtat, James E Feng, Afshin A Anoushiravani, Steven T Lyons, Thomas Bernasek
{"title":"Patient Frailty in Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Implementation of a Frailty Score Using an Electronic Medical Record.","authors":"Casey M O'Connor, Ameer Tabbaa, Luba Ayzenshtat, James E Feng, Afshin A Anoushiravani, Steven T Lyons, Thomas Bernasek","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.01.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Frailty has been associated with poor outcomes and higher costs after primary total knee arthroplasty. However, the implementation of a frailty score at a level one tertiary care facility to evaluate patient outcomes has not been well described. This study examined the retrospective implementation of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) and the relationship of the HFRS score with 90-day readmission, revision at any time point, and length of initial hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using our relational database from our hospitals' electronic medical record system, we identified patients who were discharged following primary TKA from 2015 to 2023. The HFRS was calculated for each patient to determine frailty. Frail patients were defined as those who had an HFRS ≥ 5 and non-frail patients had an HFRS < 5. We used regression analyses to adjust for demographic confounders to evaluate the association of patient frailty (as defined by an HFRS ≥ 5) following primary TKA and patient outcomes, including 90-day readmissions, revision TKA, and length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Frail patients had significantly higher rates of 90-day readmission (79 versus 14), revision (30 versus 11), and length of initial hospitalization (3.5 ± 3.5 versus 2.8 ± 2.3 days) (P < 0.0001). Frail patients were at increased risk of revision TKA for mechanical loosening (0.35 versus 0.045%, P < 0.05). Also, frail patients were at significantly higher risk for readmission and revision for infection compared to the non-frail cohort (1.4 versus 0.17%, P < 0.0001; 0.81 versus 0.25%, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty, measured using HFRS, is associated with increased 90-day readmission, revision, and inpatient length of stay following primary TKA. Frail patients are at significantly increased risk of infectious complications following primary TKA. This study demonstrates that the HFRS can be implemented using a common electronic medical record (EMR) and may help multidisciplinary care teams better focus preoperative optimization interventions on this high-risk cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.01.051","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Frailty has been associated with poor outcomes and higher costs after primary total knee arthroplasty. However, the implementation of a frailty score at a level one tertiary care facility to evaluate patient outcomes has not been well described. This study examined the retrospective implementation of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) and the relationship of the HFRS score with 90-day readmission, revision at any time point, and length of initial hospitalization.

Methods: Using our relational database from our hospitals' electronic medical record system, we identified patients who were discharged following primary TKA from 2015 to 2023. The HFRS was calculated for each patient to determine frailty. Frail patients were defined as those who had an HFRS ≥ 5 and non-frail patients had an HFRS < 5. We used regression analyses to adjust for demographic confounders to evaluate the association of patient frailty (as defined by an HFRS ≥ 5) following primary TKA and patient outcomes, including 90-day readmissions, revision TKA, and length of hospital stay.

Results: Frail patients had significantly higher rates of 90-day readmission (79 versus 14), revision (30 versus 11), and length of initial hospitalization (3.5 ± 3.5 versus 2.8 ± 2.3 days) (P < 0.0001). Frail patients were at increased risk of revision TKA for mechanical loosening (0.35 versus 0.045%, P < 0.05). Also, frail patients were at significantly higher risk for readmission and revision for infection compared to the non-frail cohort (1.4 versus 0.17%, P < 0.0001; 0.81 versus 0.25%, P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Frailty, measured using HFRS, is associated with increased 90-day readmission, revision, and inpatient length of stay following primary TKA. Frail patients are at significantly increased risk of infectious complications following primary TKA. This study demonstrates that the HFRS can be implemented using a common electronic medical record (EMR) and may help multidisciplinary care teams better focus preoperative optimization interventions on this high-risk cohort.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信