Risk of suicide among oncologists in Serbia.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Nevena D Randjelovic, Dragana I Ignjatovic-Ristic, Marina V Petronijevic, Kristina Z Dugalic
{"title":"Risk of suicide among oncologists in Serbia.","authors":"Nevena D Randjelovic, Dragana I Ignjatovic-Ristic, Marina V Petronijevic, Kristina Z Dugalic","doi":"10.1177/00912174251320720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is only limited research on suicidal thoughts and behaviors of oncologists. This study examined the prevalence and correlates of suicidal thoughts among oncologists in Serbia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in January 2024 involving 159 oncologists from Serbia and the Republic of Srpska. Respondents completed an online questionnaire which assessed socio-demographic and work characteristics and included the Risk Assessment Suicidality Scale, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21, Maslach Burnout Inventory, and Brief Resilience Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that 21.4% of oncologists reported elevated suicidality scores. Medical oncologists had the highest average suicidality scores compared to surgical and radiation oncologists, although these differences were not statistically significant. Key associated factors with suicidality included seeing a psychiatrist, undergoing psychiatric therapy, having family history of depression, and family history of suicide attempts and/or suicide. Resilience and sense of personal accomplishment were inversely associated with suicidality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The finding that 1 out of 5 oncologists had elevated suicidality scores underscores the urgent need for mental health support for members of this profession, particularly those showing signs of distress. Interventions should promote resilience, enhance personal accomplishment, and ensure easy access to psychiatric care. While these results contribute to the limited data on suicidality among oncologists, they also identify gaps that future studies should address, such as the need for larger sample sizes and the exploration of other potential risk factors. Addressing oncologists' mental health challenges is critical to reducing suicide risk and fostering well-being in this high-risk profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":50294,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"912174251320720"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00912174251320720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is only limited research on suicidal thoughts and behaviors of oncologists. This study examined the prevalence and correlates of suicidal thoughts among oncologists in Serbia.

Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted in January 2024 involving 159 oncologists from Serbia and the Republic of Srpska. Respondents completed an online questionnaire which assessed socio-demographic and work characteristics and included the Risk Assessment Suicidality Scale, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21, Maslach Burnout Inventory, and Brief Resilience Scale.

Results: Results indicated that 21.4% of oncologists reported elevated suicidality scores. Medical oncologists had the highest average suicidality scores compared to surgical and radiation oncologists, although these differences were not statistically significant. Key associated factors with suicidality included seeing a psychiatrist, undergoing psychiatric therapy, having family history of depression, and family history of suicide attempts and/or suicide. Resilience and sense of personal accomplishment were inversely associated with suicidality.

Conclusions: The finding that 1 out of 5 oncologists had elevated suicidality scores underscores the urgent need for mental health support for members of this profession, particularly those showing signs of distress. Interventions should promote resilience, enhance personal accomplishment, and ensure easy access to psychiatric care. While these results contribute to the limited data on suicidality among oncologists, they also identify gaps that future studies should address, such as the need for larger sample sizes and the exploration of other potential risk factors. Addressing oncologists' mental health challenges is critical to reducing suicide risk and fostering well-being in this high-risk profession.

塞尔维亚肿瘤医生的自杀风险。
目的:目前对肿瘤医生自杀念头和行为的研究还很有限。本研究调查了塞尔维亚肿瘤学家自杀念头的流行程度及其相关因素。方法:于2024年1月进行横断面研究,涉及来自塞尔维亚和塞族共和国的159名肿瘤学家。被调查者完成了一份评估社会人口学和工作特征的在线调查问卷,包括自杀风险评估量表、抑郁焦虑压力量表-21、Maslach倦怠量表和简短恢复力量表。结果:21.4%的肿瘤科医生报告自杀得分升高。与外科和放射肿瘤学家相比,内科肿瘤学家的平均自杀得分最高,尽管这些差异没有统计学意义。与自杀相关的关键因素包括看精神病医生、接受精神治疗、有抑郁症家族史、有自杀企图和/或自杀家族史。适应力和个人成就感与自杀倾向呈负相关。结论:五分之一的肿瘤学家的自杀倾向得分较高,这一发现强调了这一职业的成员,特别是那些表现出痛苦迹象的人,迫切需要心理健康支持。干预措施应促进恢复力,提高个人素养,并确保容易获得精神科护理。虽然这些结果对肿瘤学家自杀的有限数据有所贡献,但它们也确定了未来研究应该解决的差距,例如需要更大的样本量和探索其他潜在的风险因素。解决肿瘤学家的心理健康挑战对于降低自杀风险和促进这个高风险职业的福祉至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine (IJPM) bridges the gap between clinical psychiatry research and primary care clinical research. Providing a forum for addressing: The relevance of psychobiological, psychological, social, familial, religious, and cultural factors in the development and treatment of illness; the relationship of biomarkers to psychiatric symptoms and syndromes in primary care...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信