Dry needling of the gluteus-medius muscle, combined with standard care, for chronic low back pain - a pilot randomized sham-controlled trial.

IF 1.6 Q2 REHABILITATION
Gali Dar, Alon Goldberg
{"title":"Dry needling of the gluteus-medius muscle, combined with standard care, for chronic low back pain - a pilot randomized sham-controlled trial.","authors":"Gali Dar, Alon Goldberg","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2025.2465726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with low back pain (LBP) often exhibit weakness and the presence of trigger points in their Gluteus Medius (GMe) muscle.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the effectiveness of adding dry needling (DN) for the GMe to standard care of active physical therapy in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, prospective, sham-controlled trial was conducted. Participants with chronic nonspecific LBP (<i>N</i> = 22, age range: 31-55 years) were randomly divided into intervention and control groups. Both groups received active physical therapy including exercises for 6 treatments. In addition, at each session, the intervention group received deep DN to their GMe muscle, and the control group received sham needling. Outcome measures included level of pain (using VAS scale), function (Oswestry disability index ODI), low back range of motion (ROM) (forward flexion and schober tests), and global rating of change. The research group was further divided into moderate and minimal disability according to the ODI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The research group showed greater improvement in pain level compared with control (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The change in ODI was higher in the moderate LBP group compared with the control group (B = 5.25, <i>p</i> < 0.05). The change in forward flexion distance test was higher in the moderate disability LBP group compared with the control group (B = 6.31, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Simple mean analysis also revealed a significant difference between the moderate and minimal disability groups (B = 6.16, <i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incorporating DN into physical therapy treatments for chronic nonspecific low back pain, can improve pain level and function.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration no: </strong>NCT04498572 (clinicaltrial.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2025.2465726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with low back pain (LBP) often exhibit weakness and the presence of trigger points in their Gluteus Medius (GMe) muscle.

Objectives: To examine the effectiveness of adding dry needling (DN) for the GMe to standard care of active physical therapy in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP.

Methods: A randomized, prospective, sham-controlled trial was conducted. Participants with chronic nonspecific LBP (N = 22, age range: 31-55 years) were randomly divided into intervention and control groups. Both groups received active physical therapy including exercises for 6 treatments. In addition, at each session, the intervention group received deep DN to their GMe muscle, and the control group received sham needling. Outcome measures included level of pain (using VAS scale), function (Oswestry disability index ODI), low back range of motion (ROM) (forward flexion and schober tests), and global rating of change. The research group was further divided into moderate and minimal disability according to the ODI.

Results: The research group showed greater improvement in pain level compared with control (p = 0.01). The change in ODI was higher in the moderate LBP group compared with the control group (B = 5.25, p < 0.05). The change in forward flexion distance test was higher in the moderate disability LBP group compared with the control group (B = 6.31, p < 0.01). Simple mean analysis also revealed a significant difference between the moderate and minimal disability groups (B = 6.16, p = 0.01).

Conclusions: Incorporating DN into physical therapy treatments for chronic nonspecific low back pain, can improve pain level and function.

Clinical trials registration no: NCT04498572 (clinicaltrial.gov).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信