Association of cancers with the occurrence and 28-day mortality of sepsis: a mendelian randomization and mediator analysis.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Dengwei Cheng, Shangwen Pan, Xiangzhi Fang, Su Wang, Xiaojing Zou, Huaqing Shu, Xiaobo Yang, Jiqian Xu, You Shang
{"title":"Association of cancers with the occurrence and 28-day mortality of sepsis: a mendelian randomization and mediator analysis.","authors":"Dengwei Cheng, Shangwen Pan, Xiangzhi Fang, Su Wang, Xiaojing Zou, Huaqing Shu, Xiaobo Yang, Jiqian Xu, You Shang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-89354-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Observational studies have indicated an association between cancer and the occurrence of sepsis, with an increased risk of mortality in cancer-related sepsis. However, whether a causal relationship exists between the two remains unknown. Summary statistics of thirteen cancers from the largest available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of GWAS catalog and FinnGen biobank were extracted for the MR analysis. GWAS data for sepsis and its 28-day mortality were obtained from MRC-IEU. Univariable, multivariable, and reverse MR analyses were employed to explore potential associations between cancers and sepsis and its 28-day mortality. Moreover, a two-step mediation MR analysis was performed to investigate independent positive causal relationships between cancers and sepsis and its 28-day mortality. In univariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, significant causal relationships were found between genetically predicted lung cancer (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.08-1.26, adjusted p = 0.001), squamous cell lung carcinoma (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.02-1.18, adjusted p = 0.042), lung adenocarcinoma (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.03-1.21, adjusted p = 0.032), small cell lung carcinoma (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02-1.12, adjusted p = 0.031), and sepsis. Subsequent multivariable MR analysis revealed that these three types of lung cancer were independently associated with the risk of sepsis. Additionally, a causal relationship was found between lung cancer and 28-day mortality from sepsis, while no causal link was observed between non-solid tumors and the onset or death of sepsis. Reverse MR analysis did not indicate a potential for sepsis to trigger the onset of cancers. Furthermore, TRAIL was found to have promotive effects on the occurrence and mortality of sepsis. Lung cancer causally correlates with increased sepsis occurrence and 28-day mortality, as evidenced by Mendelian Randomization analysis. Genetic predispositions enhance this risk, underscoring the potential of genetic profiling to guide early, precise sepsis interventions in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"5600"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89354-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Observational studies have indicated an association between cancer and the occurrence of sepsis, with an increased risk of mortality in cancer-related sepsis. However, whether a causal relationship exists between the two remains unknown. Summary statistics of thirteen cancers from the largest available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of GWAS catalog and FinnGen biobank were extracted for the MR analysis. GWAS data for sepsis and its 28-day mortality were obtained from MRC-IEU. Univariable, multivariable, and reverse MR analyses were employed to explore potential associations between cancers and sepsis and its 28-day mortality. Moreover, a two-step mediation MR analysis was performed to investigate independent positive causal relationships between cancers and sepsis and its 28-day mortality. In univariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, significant causal relationships were found between genetically predicted lung cancer (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.08-1.26, adjusted p = 0.001), squamous cell lung carcinoma (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.02-1.18, adjusted p = 0.042), lung adenocarcinoma (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.03-1.21, adjusted p = 0.032), small cell lung carcinoma (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02-1.12, adjusted p = 0.031), and sepsis. Subsequent multivariable MR analysis revealed that these three types of lung cancer were independently associated with the risk of sepsis. Additionally, a causal relationship was found between lung cancer and 28-day mortality from sepsis, while no causal link was observed between non-solid tumors and the onset or death of sepsis. Reverse MR analysis did not indicate a potential for sepsis to trigger the onset of cancers. Furthermore, TRAIL was found to have promotive effects on the occurrence and mortality of sepsis. Lung cancer causally correlates with increased sepsis occurrence and 28-day mortality, as evidenced by Mendelian Randomization analysis. Genetic predispositions enhance this risk, underscoring the potential of genetic profiling to guide early, precise sepsis interventions in these patients.

癌症与脓毒症的发生和28天死亡率的关系:孟德尔随机化和中介分析。
观察性研究表明,癌症与败血症的发生之间存在关联,癌症相关败血症的死亡风险增加。然而,两者之间是否存在因果关系尚不清楚。从GWAS目录和FinnGen生物银行中最大的可用全基因组关联研究(GWAS)中提取13种癌症的汇总统计数据用于MR分析。脓毒症的GWAS数据及其28天死亡率由MRC-IEU获得。采用单变量、多变量和反向MR分析来探索癌症与败血症及其28天死亡率之间的潜在关联。此外,进行了两步调解MR分析,以调查癌症与败血症及其28天死亡率之间的独立正因果关系。在单变量孟德尔随机化(MR)分析中,发现基因预测肺癌(OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.08-1.26,校正p = 0.001)、鳞状细胞肺癌(OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.02-1.18,校正p = 0.042)、肺腺癌(OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.03-1.21,校正p = 0.032)、小细胞肺癌(OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02-1.12,校正p = 0.031)和脓毒症之间存在显著的因果关系。随后的多变量磁共振分析显示,这三种类型的肺癌与败血症的风险独立相关。此外,发现肺癌与败血症28天死亡率之间存在因果关系,而非实体肿瘤与败血症的发病或死亡之间没有因果关系。反向磁共振分析没有显示脓毒症可能引发癌症的发生。此外,TRAIL还被发现对脓毒症的发生和死亡率有促进作用。孟德尔随机化分析证实,肺癌与脓毒症发生率和28天死亡率增加有因果关系。遗传易感性增加了这种风险,强调了遗传谱在指导这些患者早期、精确的败血症干预方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信