Pharmacological Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Ana Carolina de Jesus Palma, César Romero Antunes Júnior, Eduardo Silva Reis Barreto, Vinicius Borges Alencar, Anna Karla do Nascimento Souza, Clarissa Maria de Cerqueira Mathias, Liliane Elze Falcão Lins-Kusterer, Liana Maria Torres de Araujo Azi, Durval Campos Kraychete
{"title":"Pharmacological Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Ana Carolina de Jesus Palma, César Romero Antunes Júnior, Eduardo Silva Reis Barreto, Vinicius Borges Alencar, Anna Karla do Nascimento Souza, Clarissa Maria de Cerqueira Mathias, Liliane Elze Falcão Lins-Kusterer, Liana Maria Torres de Araujo Azi, Durval Campos Kraychete","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2025.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) affects up to 80% of patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy. This painful condition significantly impairs quality of life and often necessitates dose reduction or discontinuation of chemotherapy, negatively impacting overall survival. Currently, duloxetine is the only pharmacological treatment recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of various pharmacological interventions in CIPN treatment, providing substantial evidence for clinical practice and future research.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to assess the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for CIPN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Herbal and phytotherapeutic treatments were excluded. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, with a third reviewer resolving disagreements. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the COCHRANE's RoB 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 860 screened articles, 17 RCTs met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 15 different pharmacological agents. Duloxetine, pregabalin, and amitriptyline were the most studied. Thirteen studies utilized a placebo as a control. Investigated medications exhibited varied outcomes, with some showing significant benefits in reducing neuropathic pain while others did not demonstrate statistically significant efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Duloxetine is an effective and well-tolerated option, while pregabalin shows promising results but requires further investigation. Other agents, such as venlafaxine and tapentadol, lack strong supporting evidence. Treatments like acetyl-l-carnitine, monosialotetrahexo-sylganglioside 1, and tetrodoxine yield inconsistent results, highlighting the need for additional research. Larger RCTs are recommended for comprehensive evaluation. Nurses are essential in CIPN care by monitoring symptoms, educating patients, and collaborating with the team.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2025.01.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) affects up to 80% of patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy. This painful condition significantly impairs quality of life and often necessitates dose reduction or discontinuation of chemotherapy, negatively impacting overall survival. Currently, duloxetine is the only pharmacological treatment recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of various pharmacological interventions in CIPN treatment, providing substantial evidence for clinical practice and future research.

Design: This systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to assess the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for CIPN.

Methods: Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Herbal and phytotherapeutic treatments were excluded. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, with a third reviewer resolving disagreements. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the COCHRANE's RoB 2 tool.

Results: Out of 860 screened articles, 17 RCTs met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 15 different pharmacological agents. Duloxetine, pregabalin, and amitriptyline were the most studied. Thirteen studies utilized a placebo as a control. Investigated medications exhibited varied outcomes, with some showing significant benefits in reducing neuropathic pain while others did not demonstrate statistically significant efficacy.

Conclusion: Duloxetine is an effective and well-tolerated option, while pregabalin shows promising results but requires further investigation. Other agents, such as venlafaxine and tapentadol, lack strong supporting evidence. Treatments like acetyl-l-carnitine, monosialotetrahexo-sylganglioside 1, and tetrodoxine yield inconsistent results, highlighting the need for additional research. Larger RCTs are recommended for comprehensive evaluation. Nurses are essential in CIPN care by monitoring symptoms, educating patients, and collaborating with the team.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信