Use of Clinically Informed Strategies and Diagnostic Yields of Genetic Testing for Fetal Structural Anomalies Following a Non-Diagnostic Microarray Result: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1002/pd.6759
Victoria M Allen, Erica Schollenberg, Erika Aberg, Jo-Ann K Brock
{"title":"Use of Clinically Informed Strategies and Diagnostic Yields of Genetic Testing for Fetal Structural Anomalies Following a Non-Diagnostic Microarray Result: A Population-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Victoria M Allen, Erica Schollenberg, Erika Aberg, Jo-Ann K Brock","doi":"10.1002/pd.6759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the performance of targeted gene sequencing, expanded gene panels, and selected exomes for prenatally identified fetal anomalies, after non-diagnostic microarray results.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>All fetal samples received for genetic testing for fetal structural anomalies in the Canadian Maritime Provinces (2014-2022) were identified. Utilization and results of NGS sequencing strategies after a non-diagnostic microarray were correlated with ultrasound findings and autopsy results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and ninety-three cases of fetal anomalies with non-diagnostic RAD results were identified, including 319 (54%) with isolated anomalies. Diagnostic yield from the microarray was 7.5%. Sequence-based testing for 131 cases gave an overall diagnostic yield of 38% (8.4% of initial cohort). For isolated anomalies, diagnostic yield was highest in the intracranial, renal, and musculoskeletal systems (44%, 60%, 64% respectively). Appropriate targeted gene sequencing provided a diagnostic yield of 40%. With clinically indicated criteria for exome analysis, diagnostic yields were higher than when clinical information prompted use of a selected gene panel (73% vs. 27%). Expanding to an exome after a non-diagnostic gene panel had an additional diagnostic yield of 13%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multidisciplinary review and comprehensive clinical information can inform the selection of strategies for expanded genetic testing after non-diagnostic microarray for fetal anomalies within a publicly funded health care system.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"318-325"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6759","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the performance of targeted gene sequencing, expanded gene panels, and selected exomes for prenatally identified fetal anomalies, after non-diagnostic microarray results.

Method: All fetal samples received for genetic testing for fetal structural anomalies in the Canadian Maritime Provinces (2014-2022) were identified. Utilization and results of NGS sequencing strategies after a non-diagnostic microarray were correlated with ultrasound findings and autopsy results.

Results: Five hundred and ninety-three cases of fetal anomalies with non-diagnostic RAD results were identified, including 319 (54%) with isolated anomalies. Diagnostic yield from the microarray was 7.5%. Sequence-based testing for 131 cases gave an overall diagnostic yield of 38% (8.4% of initial cohort). For isolated anomalies, diagnostic yield was highest in the intracranial, renal, and musculoskeletal systems (44%, 60%, 64% respectively). Appropriate targeted gene sequencing provided a diagnostic yield of 40%. With clinically indicated criteria for exome analysis, diagnostic yields were higher than when clinical information prompted use of a selected gene panel (73% vs. 27%). Expanding to an exome after a non-diagnostic gene panel had an additional diagnostic yield of 13%.

Conclusion: Multidisciplinary review and comprehensive clinical information can inform the selection of strategies for expanded genetic testing after non-diagnostic microarray for fetal anomalies within a publicly funded health care system.

非诊断性微阵列结果后胎儿结构异常基因检测的临床知情策略和诊断率:一项基于人群的队列研究。
目的:探讨在非诊断性微阵列结果后,靶向基因测序、扩展基因面板和选择外显子组用于产前鉴定的胎儿异常的性能。方法:对加拿大沿海省份(2014-2022年)所有接受胎儿结构异常基因检测的胎儿样本进行鉴定。非诊断性微阵列后NGS测序策略的使用和结果与超声检查结果和尸检结果相关。结果:共发现非诊断性RAD胎儿异常593例,其中孤立性异常319例(54%)。芯片的诊断产率为7.5%。对131例病例进行基于序列的检测,总体诊断率为38%(占初始队列的8.4%)。对于孤立的异常,颅内、肾脏和肌肉骨骼系统的诊断率最高(分别为44%、60%和64%)。适当的靶向基因测序提供了40%的诊断率。使用临床指示的外显子组分析标准,诊断率高于临床信息提示使用选定基因面板时的诊断率(73%对27%)。在非诊断基因面板扩展到外显子组后,额外的诊断率为13%。结论:多学科综述和全面的临床信息可以为在公共资助的卫生保健系统中对胎儿异常进行非诊断性微阵列后扩大基因检测的策略选择提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信