Trends in Medicare Part D Spending on Topical Steroids from 2012 to 2021 Increasing Costs of Generic Topical Steroids and Potential Savings.

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Sophia Ly, Priya Manjaly, Kanika Kamal, Arash Mostaghimi
{"title":"Trends in Medicare Part D Spending on Topical Steroids from 2012 to 2021 Increasing Costs of Generic Topical Steroids and Potential Savings.","authors":"Sophia Ly, Priya Manjaly, Kanika Kamal, Arash Mostaghimi","doi":"10.1016/j.jaad.2025.02.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing prescription drugs costs are a major concern in healthcare. The literature lacks an up-to-date assessment of U.S. expenditures on topical steroids, one of the most prescribed medications in dermatology.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize trends in Medicare spending and costs per unit of topical steroids, and to model potential savings from substitution of the cheapest steroid within each potency class.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of Medicare Part D Public Use Files, which provides prescription drug expenditure data between 2012 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2012 and 2021, Medicare Part D spent $5.7 billion on topical steroids, with generics accounting for 98.3%. While there has been a steady decline since 2015, total annual spending has overall increased by 35.6%, from $322.2 million in 2012 to $437 million in 2021. Inflation-adjusted costs per unit increased for most generic topical steroids, while the rate of change declined with increasing market competition. Medicare had potential savings of $2.4 billion if prescriptions were substituted for the cheapest steroid within each potency class.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The dataset represented only 70-77% of beneficiaries with Part D plans, excluded manufacturer rebates, and aggregated all drug strengths. We also excluded drugs with proprietary vehicles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medicare expenditures on topical steroids have increased in the past decade, primarily driven by rising generic drug costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2025.02.025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing prescription drugs costs are a major concern in healthcare. The literature lacks an up-to-date assessment of U.S. expenditures on topical steroids, one of the most prescribed medications in dermatology.

Objective: To characterize trends in Medicare spending and costs per unit of topical steroids, and to model potential savings from substitution of the cheapest steroid within each potency class.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of Medicare Part D Public Use Files, which provides prescription drug expenditure data between 2012 and 2021.

Results: Between 2012 and 2021, Medicare Part D spent $5.7 billion on topical steroids, with generics accounting for 98.3%. While there has been a steady decline since 2015, total annual spending has overall increased by 35.6%, from $322.2 million in 2012 to $437 million in 2021. Inflation-adjusted costs per unit increased for most generic topical steroids, while the rate of change declined with increasing market competition. Medicare had potential savings of $2.4 billion if prescriptions were substituted for the cheapest steroid within each potency class.

Limitations: The dataset represented only 70-77% of beneficiaries with Part D plans, excluded manufacturer rebates, and aggregated all drug strengths. We also excluded drugs with proprietary vehicles.

Conclusion: Medicare expenditures on topical steroids have increased in the past decade, primarily driven by rising generic drug costs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
2023
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (JAAD) is the official scientific publication of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). Its primary goal is to cater to the educational requirements of the dermatology community. Being the top journal in the field, JAAD publishes original articles that have undergone peer review. These articles primarily focus on clinical, investigative, and population-based studies related to dermatology. Another key area of emphasis is research on healthcare delivery and quality of care. JAAD also highlights high-quality, cost-effective, and innovative treatments within the field. In addition to this, the journal covers new diagnostic techniques and various other topics relevant to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of skin, hair, and nail disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信