The STRIPED Dietary Supplement Label Explorer: A Tool to Identify Supplements Sold with Weight-Loss, Muscle-Building, and Cleanse/Detox Claims.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Julia A Vitagliano, Jill R Kavanaugh, Boone Gorges, Xiaokang Fu, Kieran Todd, Carly E Milliren, Amanda Raffoul, S Bryn Austin
{"title":"The STRIPED Dietary Supplement Label Explorer: A Tool to Identify Supplements Sold with Weight-Loss, Muscle-Building, and Cleanse/Detox Claims.","authors":"Julia A Vitagliano, Jill R Kavanaugh, Boone Gorges, Xiaokang Fu, Kieran Todd, Carly E Milliren, Amanda Raffoul, S Bryn Austin","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited federal premarket oversight over United States-sold dietary supplements impedes consumer safety and product efficacy. The Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD) was created to increase publicly available information on United States-sold dietary supplements. Building on what the DSLD was designed to provide, we aimed to create a comprehensive database that can facilitate searches on supplements sold with weight loss, muscle building, and cleanse/detox claims, supplement categories previously flagged for misleading claims and containing toxic ingredients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to leverage publicly available DSLD Application Programming Interface (API) to develop an easy-to-use tool to classify DSLD supplement labels with weight loss, muscle building and cleanse/detox claims.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 4-step categorization methodology was used to develop the tool: 1) create reference standard database by deductively coding claims (weight loss, muscle building, and cleanse/detox) on 5000 DSLD labels; 2) develop 3 systematic heuristics (1 per claim) and refine heuristics as assessed by recall, specificity, precision, negative predictive value, F1 Score, and accuracy; 3) develop multimodal deep learning model as an additional method to identify the 3 claims; and 4) compare models' performance using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and efficiency analyses (i.e. hours of human labor taken to develop each model).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 4745 DSLD labels included in the reference standard database, 4.2% were defined using the criteria as weight loss, 6.3% muscle building, and 3.0% cleanse/detox. Three systematic heuristics for each claim were refined 4 times, with pass 4 exceeding prior passes' performances. ROC curve analyses indicated that systematic heuristic performed significantly better (P < 0.05) than the multimodal deep learning model at classifying cleanse/detox labels, yet efficiency analyses found systematic heuristics less efficient (110 compared with 30 h).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings illustrate the feasibility of using the DSLD API to create a tool that classifies weight loss, muscle building, and cleanse/detox labels using our supplement label categorization methodology. This publicly available tool, STRIPED Dietary Supplement Label Explorer, may be used to support future research and the monitoring of claims on dietary supplement labels.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.02.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limited federal premarket oversight over United States-sold dietary supplements impedes consumer safety and product efficacy. The Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD) was created to increase publicly available information on United States-sold dietary supplements. Building on what the DSLD was designed to provide, we aimed to create a comprehensive database that can facilitate searches on supplements sold with weight loss, muscle building, and cleanse/detox claims, supplement categories previously flagged for misleading claims and containing toxic ingredients.

Objectives: This study aims to leverage publicly available DSLD Application Programming Interface (API) to develop an easy-to-use tool to classify DSLD supplement labels with weight loss, muscle building and cleanse/detox claims.

Methods: A 4-step categorization methodology was used to develop the tool: 1) create reference standard database by deductively coding claims (weight loss, muscle building, and cleanse/detox) on 5000 DSLD labels; 2) develop 3 systematic heuristics (1 per claim) and refine heuristics as assessed by recall, specificity, precision, negative predictive value, F1 Score, and accuracy; 3) develop multimodal deep learning model as an additional method to identify the 3 claims; and 4) compare models' performance using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and efficiency analyses (i.e. hours of human labor taken to develop each model).

Results: Of the 4745 DSLD labels included in the reference standard database, 4.2% were defined using the criteria as weight loss, 6.3% muscle building, and 3.0% cleanse/detox. Three systematic heuristics for each claim were refined 4 times, with pass 4 exceeding prior passes' performances. ROC curve analyses indicated that systematic heuristic performed significantly better (P < 0.05) than the multimodal deep learning model at classifying cleanse/detox labels, yet efficiency analyses found systematic heuristics less efficient (110 compared with 30 h).

Conclusions: Our findings illustrate the feasibility of using the DSLD API to create a tool that classifies weight loss, muscle building, and cleanse/detox labels using our supplement label categorization methodology. This publicly available tool, STRIPED Dietary Supplement Label Explorer, may be used to support future research and the monitoring of claims on dietary supplement labels.

背景:联邦对在美国销售的膳食补充剂的上市前监督有限,妨碍了消费者的安全和产品的功效。膳食补充剂标签数据库(DSLD)的建立旨在增加美国销售的膳食补充剂的公开信息。在 DSLD 的基础上,我们的目标是创建一个综合数据库,以便于搜索以减肥、增肌和清洁/排毒等声称销售的补充剂,这些补充剂类别以前曾因误导性声称和含有有毒成分而被标记:利用公开可用的 DSLD API 开发一种易于使用的工具,对带有减肥、增肌和清洁/排毒声称的 DSLD 补充剂标签进行分类:方法:采用四步分类法开发该工具:(1)通过对 5000 个 DSLD 标签上的声称(减肥、增肌、清洁/排毒)进行演绎编码,创建参考标准数据库。(2) 开发三个系统启发式方法(每个索赔一个),并根据召回率、特异性、精确度、阴性预测值、F1 分数和准确性对启发式方法进行评估。(3) 开发多模态深度学习模型,作为识别三种主张的附加方法。(4) 利用 ROC 曲线和效率分析(即开发每个模型所耗费的人力时数)比较模型的性能:结果:在参考标准数据库收录的 4745 个 DSLD 标签中,4.2% 被定义为减肥,6.3% 为增肌,3.0% 为清洁/排毒。对每种声称的三种系统启发式方法进行了四次改进,第四次改进的结果超过了前几次改进的结果。ROC 曲线分析表明,系统启发式的表现要好得多(PC 结论:我们的研究结果表明,在对所有声称进行分析时,系统启发式的表现要好得多:我们的研究结果表明了使用 DSLD API 创建一个工具的可行性,该工具可使用我们的补充剂标签分类方法对减肥、增肌和清洁/排毒标签进行分类。这个名为 STRIPED 膳食补充剂标签资源管理器的公开工具可用于支持未来的研究和监测膳食补充剂标签上的声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition
Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
260
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信