Genetic association of MIR-449B, GCLC, eNOS, SORD, and ENPP1 with diabetic retinopathy

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Huijuan Xu , Lin Fan , Huaichao Luo , Xueming Ju , Huan Li , Shisong Rong , Ye Yuan , Jialing Xiao , Ruifan Zhang , Kaifang Wang , Rong Zou , Fang Hao , Yi Shi , Yu Zhou , Zhenglin Yang , Yijun Liu , Bo Gong
{"title":"Genetic association of MIR-449B, GCLC, eNOS, SORD, and ENPP1 with diabetic retinopathy","authors":"Huijuan Xu ,&nbsp;Lin Fan ,&nbsp;Huaichao Luo ,&nbsp;Xueming Ju ,&nbsp;Huan Li ,&nbsp;Shisong Rong ,&nbsp;Ye Yuan ,&nbsp;Jialing Xiao ,&nbsp;Ruifan Zhang ,&nbsp;Kaifang Wang ,&nbsp;Rong Zou ,&nbsp;Fang Hao ,&nbsp;Yi Shi ,&nbsp;Yu Zhou ,&nbsp;Zhenglin Yang ,&nbsp;Yijun Liu ,&nbsp;Bo Gong","doi":"10.1016/j.exer.2025.110287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Identifying the genetic risk factors of diabetic retinopathy (DR) is essential for discovering the potential pathogenesis of DR. This study determined the association of DR with five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) specifically in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, including rs10061133(<em>MIR-449B)</em>, rs17883901(<em>GCLC)</em>, rs2070744(<em>eNOS</em>), rs3759890 (<em>SORD)</em> and rs7754561 (<em>ENPP1).</em> A total of 1433 individuals were enrolled in this study, comprising healthy controls (ctrls = 480), individuals with diabetes mellitus without retinopathy (DNR = 480), non-proliferative DR(NPDR = 378), and proliferative DR(PDR = 95). The five SNPs were genotyped utilizing Mass ARRAY MALDI-TOF technology. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for the risk of genotype and allele. We performed a literature search in PubMed published before July 16, 2023. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the overall quality of the case-control studies. <strong>Consequently,</strong> we found that there were statistically significant differences between PDR cases and healthy controls for rs10061133 (P = 0.007, OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.32–2.23) and rs17883901 (P = 0.020, OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.08–2.57), rs17883901 was significantly associated with NPDR (P = 0.023, OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.05–1.85), there was a significant association between DR cases and healthy controls (P = 0.048, OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.00–1.48) for rs3759890 in the allelic model. DR show no relationships with the other two SNPs compared to healthy controls. In multivariate analyses comparing the DR and DNR groups, rs7754561(A), rs10061133(G), and rs17883901(A) were identified as risk loci for DR in individuals with a duration of diabetes of ≥5 years (P = 0.0023, P = 0.0037, and P = 0.0376, respectively). Furthermore, individuals carrying rs10061133(G) exhibited a higher risk of DR in the hyperglycemic group (glucose ≥8 mmol/L). Secondly, we showed that one polymorphism in <em>eNOS</em> (rs2070744, T &gt; C) showed a suggestive association with DR in the meta-analysis (allelic model:P &lt; 0.05, OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.07–1.30, Z = 3.46, I<sup>2</sup> = 34%). Subsequently, including studies that used either healthy subjects or diabetic subjects without DR as controls, the association of <em>eNOS</em> rs2070744 with DR was consistently significant (P = 0.002) and exhibited intermediate heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 48%). Furthermore, polymorphisms in <em>GCLC</em> (rs17883901) and <em>SORD</em> (rs3759890) were also associated with DR, with P-values of 0.004 (I<sup>2</sup> = 93%) and 0.03 (I<sup>2</sup> = 3%), respectively, suggesting their potential involvement in the disease. <strong>In conclusion,</strong> this study documented that rs10061133(G), rs17883901(A), and rs3759890(G) could be the independent risk factors fo<u>r</u> retinopathy in Chinese patients with T2DM, offering a foundation for genetic risk assessment in clinical practice. Furthermore, our meta-analysis reveals a significant association between rs2070744 and DR, implying the potential involvement of the <em>MIR-449B</em>, <em>GCLC</em>, <em>SORD,</em> and <em>eNOS</em> variants in the development of DR, which could be a promising direction for developing new treatments aimed at mitigating the risk of DR in susceptible populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12177,"journal":{"name":"Experimental eye research","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 110287"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental eye research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014483525000582","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying the genetic risk factors of diabetic retinopathy (DR) is essential for discovering the potential pathogenesis of DR. This study determined the association of DR with five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) specifically in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, including rs10061133(MIR-449B), rs17883901(GCLC), rs2070744(eNOS), rs3759890 (SORD) and rs7754561 (ENPP1). A total of 1433 individuals were enrolled in this study, comprising healthy controls (ctrls = 480), individuals with diabetes mellitus without retinopathy (DNR = 480), non-proliferative DR(NPDR = 378), and proliferative DR(PDR = 95). The five SNPs were genotyped utilizing Mass ARRAY MALDI-TOF technology. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for the risk of genotype and allele. We performed a literature search in PubMed published before July 16, 2023. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the overall quality of the case-control studies. Consequently, we found that there were statistically significant differences between PDR cases and healthy controls for rs10061133 (P = 0.007, OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.32–2.23) and rs17883901 (P = 0.020, OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.08–2.57), rs17883901 was significantly associated with NPDR (P = 0.023, OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.05–1.85), there was a significant association between DR cases and healthy controls (P = 0.048, OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.00–1.48) for rs3759890 in the allelic model. DR show no relationships with the other two SNPs compared to healthy controls. In multivariate analyses comparing the DR and DNR groups, rs7754561(A), rs10061133(G), and rs17883901(A) were identified as risk loci for DR in individuals with a duration of diabetes of ≥5 years (P = 0.0023, P = 0.0037, and P = 0.0376, respectively). Furthermore, individuals carrying rs10061133(G) exhibited a higher risk of DR in the hyperglycemic group (glucose ≥8 mmol/L). Secondly, we showed that one polymorphism in eNOS (rs2070744, T > C) showed a suggestive association with DR in the meta-analysis (allelic model:P < 0.05, OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.07–1.30, Z = 3.46, I2 = 34%). Subsequently, including studies that used either healthy subjects or diabetic subjects without DR as controls, the association of eNOS rs2070744 with DR was consistently significant (P = 0.002) and exhibited intermediate heterogeneity (I2 = 48%). Furthermore, polymorphisms in GCLC (rs17883901) and SORD (rs3759890) were also associated with DR, with P-values of 0.004 (I2 = 93%) and 0.03 (I2 = 3%), respectively, suggesting their potential involvement in the disease. In conclusion, this study documented that rs10061133(G), rs17883901(A), and rs3759890(G) could be the independent risk factors for retinopathy in Chinese patients with T2DM, offering a foundation for genetic risk assessment in clinical practice. Furthermore, our meta-analysis reveals a significant association between rs2070744 and DR, implying the potential involvement of the MIR-449B, GCLC, SORD, and eNOS variants in the development of DR, which could be a promising direction for developing new treatments aimed at mitigating the risk of DR in susceptible populations.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental eye research
Experimental eye research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
323
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The primary goal of Experimental Eye Research is to publish original research papers on all aspects of experimental biology of the eye and ocular tissues that seek to define the mechanisms of normal function and/or disease. Studies of ocular tissues that encompass the disciplines of cell biology, developmental biology, genetics, molecular biology, physiology, biochemistry, biophysics, immunology or microbiology are most welcomed. Manuscripts that are purely clinical or in a surgical area of ophthalmology are not appropriate for submission to Experimental Eye Research and if received will be returned without review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信