Efficacy of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics in hypertensive patients with diabetes: subgroup analysis based on albuminuria in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Daisuke Ichikawa, Wakako Kawarazaki, Sanae Saka, Tomohiko Kanaoka, Hirofumi Ohnishi, Hisatomi Arima, Shigeru Shibata
{"title":"Efficacy of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics in hypertensive patients with diabetes: subgroup analysis based on albuminuria in a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Daisuke Ichikawa, Wakako Kawarazaki, Sanae Saka, Tomohiko Kanaoka, Hirofumi Ohnishi, Hisatomi Arima, Shigeru Shibata","doi":"10.1038/s41440-025-02146-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In hypertensive patients with diabetes, the effectiveness of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in improving mortality, cardiovascular events, and renal outcomes, compared to other antihypertensive drugs such as calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and diuretics, remains uncertain, particularly in the context of albuminuria. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Japan Medical Abstracts Society databases up to October 2024. A meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials, including 14,163 patients, was performed. RAS inhibitors showed no significant advantage over CCBs or diuretics for all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR]: 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-1.08, p = 0.98), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.32-1.31, p = 0.22), stroke (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.00-1.31, p = 0.05), composite cardiovascular events (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.81-1.07, p = 0.45), or end-stage renal disease (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.72-1.08, p = 0.21). Subgroup analyses stratified by albuminuria status revealed no significant benefits of RAS inhibitors, regardless of albuminuria presence. The findings emphasize the need for cautious interpretation due to limited sample sizes, wide confidence intervals, and low precision. These results highlight the importance of considering not only RAS inhibitors but also other antihypertensive drugs as the first-line choice for blood pressure control in diabetic patients, with careful attention to side effects and other relevant factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":13029,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-025-02146-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In hypertensive patients with diabetes, the effectiveness of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in improving mortality, cardiovascular events, and renal outcomes, compared to other antihypertensive drugs such as calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and diuretics, remains uncertain, particularly in the context of albuminuria. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Japan Medical Abstracts Society databases up to October 2024. A meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials, including 14,163 patients, was performed. RAS inhibitors showed no significant advantage over CCBs or diuretics for all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR]: 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-1.08, p = 0.98), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.32-1.31, p = 0.22), stroke (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.00-1.31, p = 0.05), composite cardiovascular events (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.81-1.07, p = 0.45), or end-stage renal disease (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.72-1.08, p = 0.21). Subgroup analyses stratified by albuminuria status revealed no significant benefits of RAS inhibitors, regardless of albuminuria presence. The findings emphasize the need for cautious interpretation due to limited sample sizes, wide confidence intervals, and low precision. These results highlight the importance of considering not only RAS inhibitors but also other antihypertensive drugs as the first-line choice for blood pressure control in diabetic patients, with careful attention to side effects and other relevant factors.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hypertension Research
Hypertension Research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hypertension Research is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. The journal publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular diseases. The journal publishes Review Articles, Articles, Correspondence and Comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信