Global practice patterns of sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: a survey from the European Network of Young Gynecologic Oncologists (ENYGO).

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Enrique Chacon, Houssein El Hajj, Heng-Cheng Hsu, Nicolò Bizzarri, Irina Tsibulak, Anna Collins, Andrej Cokan, Tibor A Zwimpfer, Aleksandra N Strojna, Martina Aida Angeles, Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik, Ilker Kahramanoglu, José Ángel Mínguez, Luis Chiva, Pedro T Ramirez
{"title":"Global practice patterns of sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: a survey from the European Network of Young Gynecologic Oncologists (ENYGO).","authors":"Enrique Chacon, Houssein El Hajj, Heng-Cheng Hsu, Nicolò Bizzarri, Irina Tsibulak, Anna Collins, Andrej Cokan, Tibor A Zwimpfer, Aleksandra N Strojna, Martina Aida Angeles, Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik, Ilker Kahramanoglu, José Ángel Mínguez, Luis Chiva, Pedro T Ramirez","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This survey aimed to evaluate trends in sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for endometrial cancer among members of the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO) and the International Gynecologic Cancer Society (IGCS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online cross-sectional survey among gynecologic oncologists over 40 years of age consisting of 30 questions. It was distributed to ESGO and IGCS members via Survey Monkey and Qualtrics between September and December 2022. Surveys were excluded in the analysis if >50% of questions were incomplete. Statistical analysis, performed with SPSS version 27.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 302 (70.2%) of 430 participants completed the survey, with 159 (52.6%) affiliated with ESGO and 143 (47.4%) with IGCS. The majority were male 206 (68.2%), and 170 (56.3%) were based in Europe. Most respondents (n = 261, 86.4%) were certified gynecologic oncologists. Indocyanine green was the most common tracer used (n = 234, 77.5%), with higher rates of blue dye injections among IGCS respondents (p = .002). The predominant injection volume was 4 cm<sup>3</sup> (51%, n = 154). Most respondents (n = 232, 76.8%) used a combined superficial and deep ectocervical injection technique, with a higher proportion of superficial injections alone in the IGCS respondents (25.9% vs 11.9%, p = .003). Nearly half of the respondents (44.4%, n = 134) started SLN mapping at the uterine artery and continued dissecting laterally. In cases of mapping failure, 77.5% (n = 234) opted for side-specific lymphadenectomy. The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center algorithm was followed by 69.5% (n = 210), with 45.7% (n = 138) routinely using ex-vivo green fluorescence or gamma counter measurements. Finally, there was a higher adoption of immunohistochemistry for SLN ultra-staging in ESGO (n = 116, 73%) compared to the IGCS respondents (n = 94, 65.7%), (p = .047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed significant variations in SLN biopsy practices for endometrial cancer, underscoring the need for global standardization through harmonized guidelines, consistent training, and international collaboration to improve staging accuracy and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"100068"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This survey aimed to evaluate trends in sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for endometrial cancer among members of the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO) and the International Gynecologic Cancer Society (IGCS).

Methods: We conducted an online cross-sectional survey among gynecologic oncologists over 40 years of age consisting of 30 questions. It was distributed to ESGO and IGCS members via Survey Monkey and Qualtrics between September and December 2022. Surveys were excluded in the analysis if >50% of questions were incomplete. Statistical analysis, performed with SPSS version 27.0.

Results: A total of 302 (70.2%) of 430 participants completed the survey, with 159 (52.6%) affiliated with ESGO and 143 (47.4%) with IGCS. The majority were male 206 (68.2%), and 170 (56.3%) were based in Europe. Most respondents (n = 261, 86.4%) were certified gynecologic oncologists. Indocyanine green was the most common tracer used (n = 234, 77.5%), with higher rates of blue dye injections among IGCS respondents (p = .002). The predominant injection volume was 4 cm3 (51%, n = 154). Most respondents (n = 232, 76.8%) used a combined superficial and deep ectocervical injection technique, with a higher proportion of superficial injections alone in the IGCS respondents (25.9% vs 11.9%, p = .003). Nearly half of the respondents (44.4%, n = 134) started SLN mapping at the uterine artery and continued dissecting laterally. In cases of mapping failure, 77.5% (n = 234) opted for side-specific lymphadenectomy. The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center algorithm was followed by 69.5% (n = 210), with 45.7% (n = 138) routinely using ex-vivo green fluorescence or gamma counter measurements. Finally, there was a higher adoption of immunohistochemistry for SLN ultra-staging in ESGO (n = 116, 73%) compared to the IGCS respondents (n = 94, 65.7%), (p = .047).

Conclusions: This study showed significant variations in SLN biopsy practices for endometrial cancer, underscoring the need for global standardization through harmonized guidelines, consistent training, and international collaboration to improve staging accuracy and patient outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信