Investigation of powder properties and application aspects impacting nasal deposition of spray-dried powders in a nasal cast

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Angelika Jüptner , Regina Scherließ
{"title":"Investigation of powder properties and application aspects impacting nasal deposition of spray-dried powders in a nasal cast","authors":"Angelika Jüptner ,&nbsp;Regina Scherließ","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpb.2025.114666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, spray-dried formulations differing in morphology (spherical and wrinkled), surface polarity (hydrophilic and hydrophobic), and size (20–30 µm and 3 <!--> <!-->µm) were evaluated in a nasal cast to assess their deposition profiles. The objective was to identify how formulation properties and application aspects influence the deposition profile. For this purpose, the formulations were administered at different application angles (45° and 60°), fill weights (20 <!--> <!-->mg and 40 <!--> <!-->mg), and airflow rates (0 <!--> <!-->L/min and 15 <!--> <!-->L/min) in conjunction with a UDS powder device. The results indicate a more posterior deposition profile for 45° compared to 60° due to increased deposition in the turbinate region; conversely, deposition profiles between fill weights were comparable. Application with simultaneous airflow should be avoided because of an increasing postnasal fraction. No influence of morphology could be observed, but for the surface polarity an influence was apparent, if the powder was applied with a simulated inspiration. In these cases, a hydrophobic formulation was better dispersible than a hydrophilic formulation, which led to an increased postnasal fraction. A particle size for pulmonary application demonstrated comparable results to nasal formulations with respect to the turbinate deposition but exhibited a high postnasal fraction for hydrophobic formulations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12024,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 114666"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939641125000426","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, spray-dried formulations differing in morphology (spherical and wrinkled), surface polarity (hydrophilic and hydrophobic), and size (20–30 µm and 3  µm) were evaluated in a nasal cast to assess their deposition profiles. The objective was to identify how formulation properties and application aspects influence the deposition profile. For this purpose, the formulations were administered at different application angles (45° and 60°), fill weights (20  mg and 40  mg), and airflow rates (0  L/min and 15  L/min) in conjunction with a UDS powder device. The results indicate a more posterior deposition profile for 45° compared to 60° due to increased deposition in the turbinate region; conversely, deposition profiles between fill weights were comparable. Application with simultaneous airflow should be avoided because of an increasing postnasal fraction. No influence of morphology could be observed, but for the surface polarity an influence was apparent, if the powder was applied with a simulated inspiration. In these cases, a hydrophobic formulation was better dispersible than a hydrophilic formulation, which led to an increased postnasal fraction. A particle size for pulmonary application demonstrated comparable results to nasal formulations with respect to the turbinate deposition but exhibited a high postnasal fraction for hydrophobic formulations.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.10%
发文量
211
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics provides a medium for the publication of novel, innovative and hypothesis-driven research from the areas of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. Topics covered include for example: Design and development of drug delivery systems for pharmaceuticals and biopharmaceuticals (small molecules, proteins, nucleic acids) Aspects of manufacturing process design Biomedical aspects of drug product design Strategies and formulations for controlled drug transport across biological barriers Physicochemical aspects of drug product development Novel excipients for drug product design Drug delivery and controlled release systems for systemic and local applications Nanomaterials for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes Advanced therapy medicinal products Medical devices supporting a distinct pharmacological effect.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信