Current practices in neonatal pain management: a decade after the last Italian survey.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Paola Lago, Elisabetta Garetti, Patrizia Savant Levet, Immacolata Arenga, Anna Pirelli, Anna Chiara Frigo, Daniele Merazzi
{"title":"Current practices in neonatal pain management: a decade after the last Italian survey.","authors":"Paola Lago, Elisabetta Garetti, Patrizia Savant Levet, Immacolata Arenga, Anna Pirelli, Anna Chiara Frigo, Daniele Merazzi","doi":"10.1186/s13052-025-01896-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), as well as maternity nurseries, typically undergo painful invasive procedures during their hospital stay. We aim to report on current bedside analgesia/sedation and pain assessment practices, 10 years after the previous Italian survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a cross-sectional electronic survey. A 21-item questionnaire was distributed to directors of birth centers and NICUs to ascertain the policy for pain assessment and management in their respective units. A separate questionnaire was dispatched to neonatologists and nurses registered with the Italian Society of Neonatology. They reported on the analgesic strategies implemented for various painful bedside procedures. Both non-pharmacological and pharmacological analgesia interventions, as well as pain assessment, were analyzed. A regression model was utilized to identify factors that predict pain management practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data on pain management practices were collected from the directors of 153 NICUs and birth centers. Of these, 88.9% reported pain control following guidelines and 47.7% confirmed the presence of a local pain specialist promoting pain management in their unit. A minority, ranging from 16.3% to 41.8%, reported the use of a pain scale, a finding corroborated by the 200 doctors and 239 nurses who responded. At least one non pharmacological intervention (i.e., pacifier, sweet solution, or sensory saturation) was reported in 97.8% of the heel lances performed in the NICU and 96.5% in the maternity nursery, meanwhile for intramuscular injections in 73.8% and 70.3%, respectively. Additionally, it was reported that 22.9% of laryngoscopies were still performed without analgesia. Observations were made over 297 mechanical ventilation and 277 non-invasive ventilation courses, with non-pharmacological analgesia administered in 56.4% and 86.9% and the use of analgesic or sedative drugs in 81.7% and 17.1% of the cases, respectively. Furthermore, routine pain assessment was only undertaken in 68.0% and 64.9% of the cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a largely common propensity among Italian directors, neonatologists, and nurses to perform analgesic interventions for the most frequently encountered invasive neonatal painful procedures, though the practices are still highly variable. The availability of written guidelines and local pain specialists are confirmed as factors that contribute to the proper management of pain. However, pain assessment is still inadequate and urgently needs to be implemented to allow for tailored pain and stress control and prevention in all infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":14511,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"51 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-025-01896-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), as well as maternity nurseries, typically undergo painful invasive procedures during their hospital stay. We aim to report on current bedside analgesia/sedation and pain assessment practices, 10 years after the previous Italian survey.

Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional electronic survey. A 21-item questionnaire was distributed to directors of birth centers and NICUs to ascertain the policy for pain assessment and management in their respective units. A separate questionnaire was dispatched to neonatologists and nurses registered with the Italian Society of Neonatology. They reported on the analgesic strategies implemented for various painful bedside procedures. Both non-pharmacological and pharmacological analgesia interventions, as well as pain assessment, were analyzed. A regression model was utilized to identify factors that predict pain management practices.

Results: Data on pain management practices were collected from the directors of 153 NICUs and birth centers. Of these, 88.9% reported pain control following guidelines and 47.7% confirmed the presence of a local pain specialist promoting pain management in their unit. A minority, ranging from 16.3% to 41.8%, reported the use of a pain scale, a finding corroborated by the 200 doctors and 239 nurses who responded. At least one non pharmacological intervention (i.e., pacifier, sweet solution, or sensory saturation) was reported in 97.8% of the heel lances performed in the NICU and 96.5% in the maternity nursery, meanwhile for intramuscular injections in 73.8% and 70.3%, respectively. Additionally, it was reported that 22.9% of laryngoscopies were still performed without analgesia. Observations were made over 297 mechanical ventilation and 277 non-invasive ventilation courses, with non-pharmacological analgesia administered in 56.4% and 86.9% and the use of analgesic or sedative drugs in 81.7% and 17.1% of the cases, respectively. Furthermore, routine pain assessment was only undertaken in 68.0% and 64.9% of the cases.

Conclusions: We found a largely common propensity among Italian directors, neonatologists, and nurses to perform analgesic interventions for the most frequently encountered invasive neonatal painful procedures, though the practices are still highly variable. The availability of written guidelines and local pain specialists are confirmed as factors that contribute to the proper management of pain. However, pain assessment is still inadequate and urgently needs to be implemented to allow for tailored pain and stress control and prevention in all infants.

新生儿疼痛管理的现行做法:意大利上次调查十年后。
背景:新生儿入住新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs),以及产科托儿所,通常在住院期间经历痛苦的侵入性手术。我们的目标是报告当前床边镇痛/镇静和疼痛评估实践,10年前的意大利调查。方法:本研究采用横断面电子调查法。本研究向各生育中心主任和新生儿重症监护病房主任发放了一份21项问卷,以确定各自单位的疼痛评估和管理政策。一份单独的调查问卷发给在意大利新生儿科学会注册的新生儿科医生和护士。他们报告了对各种疼痛床边手术实施的镇痛策略。对非药物和药物镇痛干预以及疼痛评估进行了分析。回归模型用于识别预测疼痛管理实践的因素。结果:收集了153家新生儿重症监护病房和分娩中心主任的疼痛管理实践数据。其中,88.9%报告疼痛控制遵循指南,47.7%确认有当地疼痛专家在他们的单位促进疼痛管理。少数人(16.3%至41.8%)报告使用了疼痛量表,这一发现得到了200名医生和239名护士的证实。据报道,在新生儿重症监护室和产科分别有97.8%和96.5%的患儿采用了至少一种非药物干预(即安抚奶嘴、甜味溶液或感官饱和),而肌肉注射的比例分别为73.8%和70.3%。此外,据报道,22.9%的喉镜检查仍然在没有镇痛的情况下进行。共观察297次机械通气和277次无创通气,其中非药物镇痛分别占56.4%和86.9%,使用镇痛或镇静药物分别占81.7%和17.1%。常规疼痛评估仅占68.0%和64.9%。结论:我们发现意大利主任、新生儿医生和护士对最常见的侵入性新生儿疼痛手术进行镇痛干预的倾向很大程度上是共同的,尽管实践仍然是高度可变的。书面指南和当地疼痛专家的可用性被确认为有助于适当管理疼痛的因素。然而,疼痛评估仍然不充分,迫切需要实施,以允许量身定制的疼痛和压力控制和预防所有婴儿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.90%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Italian Journal of Pediatrics is an open access peer-reviewed journal that includes all aspects of pediatric medicine. The journal also covers health service and public health research that addresses primary care issues. The journal provides a high-quality forum for pediatricians and other healthcare professionals to report and discuss up-to-the-minute research and expert reviews in the field of pediatric medicine. The journal will continue to develop the range of articles published to enable this invaluable resource to stay at the forefront of the field. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, which commenced in 1975 as Rivista Italiana di Pediatria, provides a high-quality forum for pediatricians and other healthcare professionals to report and discuss up-to-the-minute research and expert reviews in the field of pediatric medicine. The journal will continue to develop the range of articles published to enable this invaluable resource to stay at the forefront of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信